Sorry like my server is my physical Windows 2003 box which I just use to run Microsoft CRM 3.0.  I have vmware server installed on that, and I run pfsense through vmware versus having separate hardware just for that.  So just confused how my physical windows server 2003 gets a 10.0.0.50 IP when vmware is using both my physical nics?

Unfortunately that's pretty vague in terms of a problem description. I am using PPPoE on a number of 1.2.3-RELEASE routers in the field and they all work fine.

Can you check the system log under Status > System Logs and post the contents here? It should have log entries from mpd, which is the program that handles making PPPoE connections.

If this is really the case (that they banned you), I don't see what alternative there is but to get a new IP and make sure it isn't also banned.

@edokid:

I'm confused, you're referring to the IP addresses assigned from my ISP?  I thought you meant 192.168 as in my local network.  Why would my ISP assign IP's like that those look like local ones, either way I have static IP so both connections have a static dedicated IP.  I'm not really understanding then what you mean by can't have 2 IPs the same?

The addresses I gave were an example of two addresses that would work and two that would not.  Yes, they are non-routable IPs and very unlikely to be given by an ISP (though some service providers, primarily WISPs, do use private addressing for their clients), but the example still stands.

All I am saying is that your two WAN connections cannot be on the same subnet.  If you are still confused then send me a private message with your IPs and subnet masks for each and I'll tell you if they'll be a problem.

i did search, but obviously with the wrong keywords. do a search for "create user", it will return everything with "create" and "user"…

I'm not sure about the hardware, I think the're full blown PCs. The'll be provided by the client. Would be nice to have a demo config of this kind of setup in the book  ;D

I still didn't try to route connection from site1 to site3 as i'm still having some connectivity issues with one direction of one of the tunnels…
Ref: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,23854.0.html

Look at the available packages.
I think bandwidthd should help you.

The Nexgate guys chimed in and helped me figure this out.

There's a backup running at 1pm, and that generates a tremendous amount of traffic between the LAN/DMZ interfaces. It's all 100BaseT equipment, so it must be 100Mbs into one interface, and 100Mbs out of the other.

The biggest problem is DNS – pfSense is running the network's DNS server, and of course when the box is totally loaded, it stops responding.

I changed the backup schedule (to late at night) and enabled network polling on the "advanced" tab... despite the admonitions. DNS is a pretty critical service!

Set the netmask to /30.

Excellent - thanks for the tip!
The "false alarm" could be prevented by recording the first successful confirmed boot so that the process is not triggered again until "armed".
Again - thinking out loud - not coding yet.
My issue is that users on sites are not nessecarily capable or trusted with access to the routers. And a 60 minute drive is a high price to pay for a 2 minute change.

A pipe dream at the moment, but I'll think on it - thanks again!

Works fine. I would use OpenVPN rather than IPsec, it handles flaky network connections a bit better.

You can get the config off the CF just fine with another BSD box.

This doc wiki article has some info about mounting the device.

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Modifying_Embedded

Sounds like something very wrong is going on, possibly a corrupt install.

Have you tried an upgrade to 1.2.3?

Depending on your location there might be other things to consider as well (I can't tell from your profile).
If you're offering internet access publicly in Germany, you must log traffic and store it for 6 months together with the username. Offering it for free is not an option then.

Apart from this, wireless internet throughout a hotel complex might be challenging as well.

Client security might be another concern. May users see each other's computers or do you have to block this? At least you have to talk to your client about this!

@skysurf76:

Just wanted to update you wallaby.

Thanks for the update.

Regarding the wireless issue: Maybe you have some interference on some channels. There are some pieces of software (e.g. kismet at http://www.kismetwireless.net and wavemon at http://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/wavemon) that can give you much more information about our wireless environment and these might help identify why you are seeing what your are seeing. For example, perhaps there is significant interference on one or more channels.

ssh log messages just go into the main system log, in /var/log/system.log - but that is a binary circular log, not a plain text log, so you need to use the 'clog' program at a shell prompt to access it, like so:

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Why_can%27t_I_view_view_log_files_with_cat/grep/etc%3F_%28clog%29