@Mikeyb!:

To caveat this first, this is a bad idea, but it's just for testing on a test network.

Watch out for the vHosts Package.
It works out of the box. Yes it have PHP, but if you really want to get rid of PHP just modify the Package defaults and you have a very light weight Web Server.

@kiekar:

all worked fine even without changing any LAN and WAN settings on the wireless router.

If you do that at the very least you must disable the DHCP server on the wireless router. It may be working fine now but sooner or later a device is going to get an IP address from the wireless router and it will be in the wrong subnet with the wrong gateway.

Going the way you originally had it configured is generally frowned upon because of the double NAT, as Derellict said, but in many situations it will work fine. I'm writing this from behind double NAT and have experienced no issues with day to day stuff. Things get complicated if you have to forward ports though and some things (VoIP) really hate double NAT.  ;)

Steve

The logs show what rule matched, and you want to see the specific source IP, you don't want the alias name there. You can tell from the rule it shows which alias it hit. There is reverse DNS lookup support there as well.

No problem. Easily done.  ;)

Steve

@stephenw10:

Have you tried disabling Squid as a test?
If that works you could exclude the bank site from the proxy.

Steve

YES!!!! This problem was in Squid, when i entered my IP in "Bypass proxy for these source IPs" site wil work fine! Thanks a lot.

P.S. I'm trying to stop squidguard but it is not take effect. Why squid blocking? My rules are allow all traffic.

Are you using extended queries?

You should post a screenshot of your config page.  Blank out anything you might feel is sensitive but do it in a way we can see all the strings.

you can also try and escape the space with \20 and see if that works

so
ou=OU WithSpace
becomes
ou=OU\20WithSpace

Or

might  be %20 as escape for space. so would be ou=OU%20WithSpace

if you need multiple groups to be searched the authentication container string should look similar to this
CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com;OU=DifferentUsers,DC=domain,DC=com

I use extended queries for my vpn access and it looks like this
memberOf=CN=VPNusers,CN=Users,DC=domain,DC=com

Yeah - I have my server side on unlimited fiber internet.  So my VPN is much faster than my connection here in Asia.  I get about 5/5 here but about 60/60 in the USA.
Sorry to hear that.  I will tell you this though.  The USA doesn't have a such thing as a anonymous / private VPN service.  They all comply with requests for info from law/government (or pretty much anyone who asks).  They all keep records.  Not one is "private".

So, don't get too hung up on the ubber private vpn claims.  Its all disinformation, misrepresentation or blatant lies.
I would go so far as to say that VPN providers are probably considered one-stop-shopping for law/government etc.
For sure you would be better off on a VPN server you set up yourself.

Its not that I condone illegal activity.  Its just that I don't think EVERYTHING should be read to make sure its legal…

Note to self, when you think you've checked everything make sure that Snort is not blocking access to your gateway  :o

Has anyone found a solution for this?
It's a real problem, sa sometimes ppp connection will fail, after days of working fine, and pfSense just won't reconnect…

nfsen is my preferred option there. Best open source one I've seen. Scrutinizer is definitely nice, but very costly.

You need to go forward at this point, not backwards. Especially not backwards to a Heartbleed-vulnerable version. Try 2.2, that's vastly safer than 2.1.1 at this point.

@stephenw10:

Just set a firewall rule on the internal interface that the mailserver is on. Specify the source IP as the mail server and the gateway as whichever WAN you want to use.

Steve

It is so easy when you know how it's done. Now I kinda feel stupid.
But thanks anyways :) Appreciate it very much!

with a /29 you would have 192.168.99.192 - 192.168.99.199 available in your subnet.  Try pinging each and every one except the address your WAN is set to.

For the rest-  a great number of small rural ISP's use private space on their networks between their routers and customer WAN.

Yeah - At least one really good person who is always on the clock or like he was saying, ESF professional paid assistance.

If you set the gateways on your DNS servers to the proper ISP, your DNS servers should get /32 routes out that specific gateway which should override the default route out the tunnel.

Note that this leaks your DNS queries to the global internet and they will no longer go out PIA (if your clients are configured to use them) so you're leaking info if you want to stay anonymous.

Otherwise you need to figure out how to use PIAs name servers, or have firewall rules that steer DNS queries to the proper places.

I doubt it.  Your traffic is probably being converted to ATM over the DSL network.  I highly doubt layer 2 info like VLAN tags can survive the trip.  But being a bridge it might.  You really need to talk to your DSL provider.  If nothing else, you will need to get your DSL bridge ports configured from untagged to tagged.  Then you need to determine if your q-in-q tags make it across.

thank you for your answer, ill do as you say… thanks