Under status –> "system logs" ARE all events.

If you compare them and go back in the logs you will find the problem that kicked the event in the header.

Afaik, open a shell and execute /etc/rc.reload_all :)

Done.
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=1592

Scott, what does this mean?

  Jan 15 14:36:03    php: : Not a valid interface action ""   Jan 15 14:36:03    php: : Processing -   Jan 15 14:36:03    php: : Not a valid interface action ""   Jan 15 14:36:03    php: : Processing start -

Or just do an ASCII art diagram ;)

I don't think your arrangement will work as is, if you want a transparent proxy then you need to have the pfSense host as a gateway between 2 different subnets.  If you don't mind it being a "normal" proxy then you'll need to read the threads about using pfSense with a single NIC.

Log into pfsense.  On the main status screen you will see a version.  Alternatively you can cat /etc/version from a shell.

http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7001.0.html

If you want to use packages you need to use the full version –> install to a HD. Alternatively you can use a Microdrive (Harddisk in CF format)

Well, I switched interfaces, making my LAN go to the Nvidia nve0 interface and my WAN go to my Realtek re1 interface and it doesn't crash anymore. It seems like it might have something to do with the dynamic window scaling on my vista box and one of those interfaces.

Thanks for the info. Will do on the secure socket suggestion…

Every inch taken in a step away from Microsoft is a step closer to IT stability...  8) Thanks again...

Cool thanks Ben.  I will see if I can get it up and running on our test network.

Captive Portal has a redirection URL.  If you enable this once a user enters credentials they will be directed to a site of your choosing.

I haven't found any that are that similar. PFSense is far better than any commercial SOHO firewall. In fact it rivals all commercial offerings in my mind. I've seen both WatchGuard and SonicWALL top of the line models crumble under a 20mb load that was a couple years ago. Cisco PIX is stable but far less intuitive than PFSense.

Areas where PFSense excels beyond other commercial firewalls.

Intuitive GUI
Feature Rich
Simple to Upgrade
Best backup and restore
Backup file is intuitive relatively easy to modify manually.
Commercial Support is available and high level.
Developers are generous and will respond to ideas, and questions.
Customizations and new features are in reach even for the modest budget with a bounty.
Leverages the power, security, stability, and maturity of the FreeBSD operating system.

For those that are anxious to use DNS-O-Matic now with PFSense 1.2 RC3 see the following instructions:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7311.msg41445.html#msg41445

Why am I the only person seeing this issue on my pfsense box with heavy torrent traffic? Now i get wireless disconnects after buffer space unavailable…

Jan 7 23:34:15 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: associated
Jan 7 23:34:12 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: deassociated
Jan 7 23:34:12 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due to local deauth request
Jan 7 23:33:09 last message repeated 2 times
Jan 7 23:31:09 last message repeated 2 times
Jan 7 23:29:09 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f WPA: group key handshake completed (RSN)
Jan 7 23:28:09 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f WPA: group key handshake completed (RSN)
Jan 7 23:27:15 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f WPA: pairwise key handshake completed (RSN)
Jan 7 23:27:15 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: associated
Jan 7 23:27:12 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: deassociated
Jan 7 23:27:12 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due to local deauth request
Jan 7 23:26:09 hostapd: ath0: STA 00:0e:8e:15:95:0f WPA: group key handshake completed (RSN)
Jan 7 23:26:33 miniupnpd[67069]: sendto(udp_notify): No buffer space available

A client is attempting to FTP to a server and the server is not available.

I've just commited a new mpd which contains his changes.  Please check the snapshot server in about an hour or two from now.

hi

i volunteer to test it on 4 different servers if any developer willing to work on it

hadi57

Here is the dump, Sorry to be in wrong thread, is it possible to move these posts to the openvpn thread?


I would imagine that its a hard coded limit.  I don't think anyone has gotten anywhere near this number considering that this is the first that I am hearing of such a large deployment consideration.

Really don't know how well this is going to work.  These really are unchartered waters.  And considering that when you make changes to PPTP it disconnects the client(s), I wouldn't see any difference on the PPPoE side as well.  If you are serious about this large of a deployment I would definitely do some type of test before going live.