• Implemented IPV6...Still Feel Left in the Dark!

    40
    2
    0 Votes
    40 Posts
    6k Views
    NollipfSenseN
    I tried and I tried...it's my ISP that's keeping me in the dark,,,their static IPv6 on the Fast5688w doesn't appear to allow pfSense LAN to communicate with WAN so RA cannot give out ULA's...
  • Contribution: Ipv6 via bridge for new users

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    418 Views
    JKnottJ
    @mauropc ???? DHCPv6-PD is the normal way for ISPs to provide IPv6 to home users. You get an IPv6 address for your WAN interface and a prefix with at a minimum 18.4 billion, billion addresses and probably a lot more. Maybe you can describe what you're trying to do and problems you're having.
  • IPv6 tunnel HE broker on PPPeE ??? Howto?

    1
    9
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    311 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    No one has replied
  • Coming back to PFsense but IPv6 doesn't appear to work

    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    3k Views
    F022YF
    @Gertjan Yeah i clicked submit then noticed my screenshot error (took it while testing) and then had a server issue at work so had to stop "playing". Thats really helpful info and gives me something to work on, i'm a simple man of PPPoE so this is a new config type for me so it's all weird and wonderful.
  • Strange intermittent IPv6 problem

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    463 Views
    F
    I occurred to me that I might have some weird config since I was importing config from a chain of older routers so who knows what might have been lurking in that XML. So I did a factory reset on the 6100 and only set the needed things. Same problem. At this point, if someone had a procedure to downgrade the 6100 to 22.5, I would absolutely do that right now.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    228 Views
    No one has replied
  • 2.4.4 ICMPv6 Firewall Rules?

    50
    0 Votes
    50 Posts
    24k Views
    johnpozJ
    @catonic said in 2.4.4 ICMPv6 Firewall Rules?: because ICMPv6 is not an option on the drop-down Sure it is.. What do you think ICMP is when you select IPv6? [image: 1695465961105-icmpv6.jpg] Here created a test rule [23.05.1-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.local.lan]/root: cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep "test icmpv6" pass in quick on $TEST inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to any ridentifier 1695465595 keep state label "USER_RULE: test icmpv6" label "id:1695465595" [23.05.1-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.local.lan]/root This thread is 3 some years old - if you are having a problem, it would be best if you actually give details of what your trying to accomplish, how and what you have done to test it. There are also hidden rules that allow some icmpv6 # Allow only bare essential icmpv6 packets (NS, NA, and RA, echoreq, echorep) pass out quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 icmp6-type {129,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000108 keep state pass out quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 icmp6-type {129,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000109 keep state pass in quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 icmp6-type {128,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000110 keep state pass in quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from ff02::/16 to fe80::/10 icmp6-type {128,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000111 keep state pass in quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 icmp6-type {128,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000112 keep state pass in quick inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16 icmp6-type {128,133,134,135,136} ridentifier 1000000113 keep state Here I created a icmpv6 echo request rule, then sent some ipv6 pings.. [image: 1695466455246-echreq.jpg] And the counter goes up.
  • Tunnel Conexion (Shared Key) to (SSl/TLS ) Problem with IPV6

    1
    6
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    251 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPv6 connectivity from internal subnet

    ipv6 prefix
    4
    10
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    816 Views
    B
    Just to close this out... To avoid any issues at the next upgrade I backed out the two changes in the patch and uninstalled the dhcpleases6 package. Then I added a new gateway on my external router that points to the hyper-v router's ipv6 address on its WAN side (the external router's LAN side), and added a static route to direct the delegated prefix subnet to that gateway. This configuration also works to allow IPv6 to work from the internal hyper-v router's LAN side. These two configuration items will be easy to back out at upgrade, assuming the issue is addressed in the next release.
  • HE Tunnelbroker

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    JKnottJ
    @kiokoman said in HE Tunnelbroker: but the most important thing of all is that they give you a t-shirt if you became a SAGE That's certainly sage advice!
  • DHCPv6 Static Assignments using IAID+DUID

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    I
    So nobody has any clue on how you can achieve individual interface assignment?
  • ipv6 dns opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    johnpozJ
    @netgate_etagten said in ipv6 dns opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED: why dhcp6c needs to reacquire the address. Did you try setting this https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/config/advanced-networking.html#do-not-allow-pd-address-release
  • How to block/allow traffic send FROM one specific IPV6-computer !!??

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    johnpozJ
    @JKnott https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/ethernet-rules.html#ethernet-layer-2-rules pfSense Plus software versions 23.05 and later include support for rule-based pass/block filtering of packets based on Ethernet (Layer 2) header attributes. If you want to play with it, get the FREE + home license.. https://shop.netgate.com/products/pfsense-software-subscription [image: 1694203482358-plus2.jpg]
  • Erratic behaviour regarding updating aliases by hostname

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    420 Views
    Bob.DigB
    @Gertjan Your usecase is "dynamic-DNS". I wish pfSense would let you do what you did but with the DDNS-Clients onboard. My usecase is a host-alias for firewall rules, which can be private IPs for v4. And it has worked in the past, now it only works partially.
  • IPV6 Prefix ID issue after upgrading to 23.05.1

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    4k Views
    A
    Thanks for all your support guys, but nothing seems to work on my Qotom pfsense box with this release. Did a new install with CE2.7 and there it works fine. As soon as I upgrade to 23.05.1 the IPv6 network doesn't get any IP addresses. Therefor will put by Qotom box on the shelf for now and re-use my Dell R320-II for the time being. Looking forward for an improved pfsense release.
  • NDP Table Timeout

    15
    1
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    I
    @johnpoz Yup, that seems to fix it. NDP Table loads up on webUI after setting my current GUA PD as local-zone. So yeah, an option to always set the PD as local-zone would be nice...
  • Does anybody use Bell/FibeTV (in Canada) with pfSense

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    JKnottJ
    @guardian said in Does anybody use Bell/FibeTV (in Canada) with pfSense: My understanding (but am not 100% sure), is that you are not behind NAT Then they will have to provide multiple IPv4 addresses and I doubt they do.
  • How to diagnose IPv6 delegation issues

    9
    3
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    JKnottJ
    @Gertjan said in How to diagnose IPv6 delegation issues: Putting the ISP router in 'bridge' mode isn't possible anymore in France. Do those routers provide DHCPv6-PD to the customer? That's what pfSense requires to provide IPv6 to the LAN. I'm on Rogers, in Canada, and if I had a fibre connection, I could completely eliminate all their equipment, other than the optical terminal, and install my own router. As I'm on cable, I have to put their modem in bridge mode. Maybe you can do a capture of what's happening on the pfSense WAN port and post it here.
  • Missing Link Local on WAN

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    Z
    @johnpoz It has a link local now. I don't know why just reassigning the interfaces in the same exact way changed it, but I'm happy with it as long as its working. bce0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 description: WAN options=800bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE> ether 00:26:b9:8b:fc:4f inet6 fe80::226:b9ff:fe8b:fc4f%bce0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2001:558:6040:52:4d97:8d28:xxxx:xxxx prefixlen 128 inet 73.x.x.x netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,master>) status: active nd6 options=23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.