• HOW TO CONNECT DIFFERENT NETWORKS

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    967 Views
    johnpozJ

    "it would be in bridge mode so the pfsense assumes the ip publica."

    Then it wouldn't be routing now would it..  What what is your question?

  • Installation output stuck on "link state down/up"

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    stephenw10S

    Sounds like you are looking at the wrong console.

    Usually the last thing it will report is ' trying to mount root…' and then you only see system messages such as link status changes. At that point the output switches to the primary console only until bootup completes.

    So if you're looking at a video console check serial is vice versa. Or force the primary console to the one you are looking at:
    https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Boot_Troubleshooting#Booting_with_an_alternate_console

    Steve

  • Cannot get access from external network

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    828 Views
    GertjanG

    The auto created Firewall rule on the WAN interface :

    wan2.PNG
    wan2.PNG_thumb

  • Slow Speeds (1oMbps on a 100Mbps connection)

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    753 Views
    S

    What is the hardware spec you are running Pfsense on?

  • IPSEC tunnel traffic stops working after 1-2 hours after upgrade 2.3.4_p1

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    897 Views
    G

    @rbird:

    We were running 2.2.5 or 2.2.6. Upgraded to 2.3.4_p1.  About one week after the upgrade the ipsec tunnel started acting up.
    It is connected to a pfsense 2.3.1.  After 1-2 hours the vpn status shows as established but I lose ping to the remote server.  A quick disconnect/connect fixes it but I can't have this happening all the time.

    Thanks
    Roger

    I'm having the same exact problem on one of IPSec tunnels. IKEv1 from my pfSense 2.3.4p1 to an OpenBSD on far end. Traffic works perfectly, then at about 2 hours, all phase 2 traffic stops but the tunnel stays up. It's almost like tunnels are not getting torn down and re-built after a re-key/re-auth. If cycle the tunnel, everything comes back, then at 2 hours nothing. (oddly, all of my IKEv2 tunnels don't have this problem, all of those are pfSense > pfSense). This is a site-to-site IPSec, not a VPC.

    I checked for duplicate routes, and there aren't any. I'm not seeing anything logs pointing to any clues as to why this is happening. I thought this might be related to this issue: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=135557.0

    However we're not using OpenBGP (it's not even installed) and we don't have any tunnels to VPC.

    Neither of us are seeing any logs on either side giving us an idea as to why everything would work fine then stop suddenly around the 2 hour mark. Any assist as to how to troubleshoot this would be great. Thank you.

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    826 Views
    D

    @dbstore:

    If I try to download that file from a browser I receive the same error.

    You cannot test this with a browser, there's no A/AAAA record for that.

    dig srv _https._tcp.pkg.pfsense.org ; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> srv _https._tcp.pkg.pfsense.org ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53242 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_https._tcp.pkg.pfsense.org.  IN      SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: _https._tcp.pkg.pfsense.org. 60 IN      SRV    10 10 443 files01.netgate.com. _https._tcp.pkg.pfsense.org. 60 IN      SRV    10 10 443 files00.netgate.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: pfsense.org.            300    IN      NS      ns1.netgate.com. pfsense.org.            300    IN      NS      ns2.netgate.com. ;; Query time: 152 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Sat Sep 23 12:06:26 CEST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 181

    https://files00.netgate.com/pfSense_v2_3_4_amd64-pfSense_v2_3_4/All/pfSense-pkg-openvpn-client-export-1.4.3.txz
    https://files01.netgate.com/pfSense_v2_3_4_amd64-pfSense_v2_3_4/All/pfSense-pkg-openvpn-client-export-1.4.3.txz

    Anyway, the file is just not there.

  • H270N-Wifi install: 2nd nic not showing up

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    946 Views
    F

    Mmmm….. Interesting. I wonder WTF I did then, I'm sure I didn't hallucinate ! I wish I still had the board to try it again

  • NEW INSTALL SUCCESSFUL - BROWSING SLOW

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S

    I see dpinger restarting a number of times, like the WAN was unplugged or some change was made. I only see one alarm there though and it's on WANv6.

    If there is some packet loss on WAN though that would obviously be a problem.

    Steve

  • PFsence 2.3.4 is not able to be installed into ADI SG-4860

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    507 Views
    ivorI

    In what slot have you installed the mSATA disk? Make sure you use the middle mSATA slot, closer to the ethernet ports. Your mSATA SSD may not be supported, what model do you have?

  • MOVED: Não consigo fazer download correto da ISO

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    291 Views
    No one has replied
  • Three networks question.

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    657 Views
    H

    please clarify what you wish to achieve … don't try this with ascii-art, draw a proper schematic.

  • Installing pfSense on Raid0

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    I

    @Gertjan:

    Wait !

    So, when choosing the automatic installl (hides all the technical details) it decides to make a 40+ Gb swap ? On a 32 Gb RAM system ….
    For info : on my 3 Gb system it never uses the swap.

    Yes, the installer makes the swap equal to 2xRAM. I have 16GB ECC RAM in that machine, so it made a 32GB swap. Someone should change that installer to ignore 2xRAM if the machine has enough for three reasons:

    It's a very old formula for deciding the size of the swap, when machines tended to have very little RAM. I am talking MBs not GBs

    For a machine that has enough RAM, swap isn't used much especially for a machine which is up 24/7 which pfSense would be.

    swap may be used in desktop OSes for hibernate etc, but for an appliance like pfSense, it's not used as much as indicated by many users here.

    @Gertjan:

    Btw : on a device like a firewall I would have opted for a raid 1 …. Knowing that you use 'old' drives ;)

    That would require me to have 2 drives. The only other 3.5" drive I have is a 500GB that I keep as emergency replacement for my FreeNAS box in case a drive fails. Also, wasting a 500GB drive for pfSense seems like a waste to me, especially since even 80GB would be more than sufficient for what I need it to do.

  • PFSense and OVH

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Scrap that, i found it under system/routing/gateways/advanced

    Thanks again

  • NIC issues with Hardware Appliance

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    8k Views
    stephenw10S

    Just for reference the fix, "LAN by-pass by GPIO", is a jumper on that board. Not a BIOS setting.

    Steve

  • Pfsense 2.3 upgrade results in no boot

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ

    Well, not much more to do then. It's a ~12 year old laptop. Maybe try a verbose boot of 2.3 and see if you see anything more, but it sounds like recent versions of FreeBSD do not like that hardware. 2.2.x is based on a much older version of FreeBSD.

  • No initial connection - no lan connection (installation)

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    545 Views
    U

    well, now they do  :o
    Thank you very much  :-* ;)
    solved!

  • MOVED: Ntopng service will not start because Redis service is not running

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    632 Views
    No one has replied
  • Newb.. Pf-sense + wireless DD-WRT router.

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    johnpozJ

    ""Bridge LAN ports to act like a switch".. but will just get a switch."

    Good choice!

  • MOVED: Suricata/Snort on a mirrored port

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    446 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multi-wan visibility em0 (wan) + em1 (wan) = em3 (Lan)

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    554 Views
    stephenw10S

    Hi,

    It's not immediately clear what you are connecting here but the short answer is no. pfSense will block all incoming traffic on an interface by default so unless you add rules to allow traffic between those subnets it will not pass.

    If we had a diagram of what subnets you're connecting and a description of why we could probably offer more insight.

    Steve

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.