• 2.3.1 Snapshots Available

    Pinned
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6k Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Squid non-functional in transparent mode in 2.3 and 2.3.1

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5k Views
    No one has replied
  • Hidden/invisible issue on bugtracker

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ

    It was a private bug (potential security issue) so not visible to the world. It's closed now. :-)

  • Proxy server

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ

    The older menu entry is likely a leftover from the 2.2.x config that was not cleanly removed by the old package. You'd have to manually edit it out of config.xml to remove it.

  • MOVED: Disk usage /var/run/ over 100% - big php-fpm.core

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: Upgrade to 2.3.1 failed

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Gitsync'd to 2.4 by mistake - going back?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    PerforadoP

    Best one yet. Sadly no hockey mask included  ;D

  • 2.3.1.a.20160513.0941 traffic graph empty (Resolved)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Monitor Gateway

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    dennypageD

    Looking at the dpinger log, it is clear that there are no probes responses actually being received. The reason that it shows as "up" initially is because dpinger cannot declare any packets lost until the initial expiration of the loss interval (2 seconds). Beyond that, it's just how soon the page is refreshed.

    So as to the source of the problem, something is dropping either the ICMP echo request or the ICMP echo reply. The first thing I would recommend is to try setting the dpinger Data Payload to 1 in the Advanced section of the Edit Gateway page (System / Routing / Gateways / Edit). If this fixes it, it means that some network element in the path simply has a defect in the handling of ICMP packets. It's not a problem to continue running with a small data payload.

    If setting a Data Payload doesn't fix it, it likely means that some element along the path is actively suppressing ICMP echo packets. To determine where, you would need to start exploring with ping and traceroute. An example for ping would be:

    ping -S src_addr 8.8.8.8

    For src_addr use the IP address of your firewall (same as the -B parameter to dpinger). If you want to mimic the behavior of dpinger, you can add a size parameter:

    ping -S src_addr -s 0 8.8.8.8

    An example for traceroute would be:

    traceroute -s src_addr 8.8.8.8

    By default traceroute uses UDP packets. To use ICMP packets instead, you would use:

    traceroute -s src_addr -I 8.8.8.8

    Traceroute allows you to specify a packet size, but does not allow a zero size payload.

    Additional options for ping and traceroute can be found in the FreeBSD man pages:

    https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi

  • Trying to mount root from ufs

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Proper way to get on the 2.3.1 dev track from a factory image?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Rules tab page errors

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    C

    Thanks Phil, beat me to digging into that one. Merged.

  • Check Box Text Form Inconsistency

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    N

    @SnowGhost:

    While your looking at check boxes, they should all be "tick for yes".  Not, "tick to disable".

    That is much more involved than just flipping it in the html.  Has to be flipped in the config and logic where used.  You are certainly welcome to commit the contributions though.

    As for looking at and updating check box text to be in title form I've not committed to doing that nor do I have an exclusive on that (not so subtle hint).

  • 2.3.1-DEVELOPMENT not updating from 2.3.1.a.20160428.0320

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    Y

    Just an update.  Went ahead and changed Update Settings from "follow 2.3 snapshots and move to automatically to -RELEASE (Default)" to "keep following 2.3 development snapshots."  Went back to System Update and the below showed:

    Current Base System 2.3.1.a.20160428.0320
    Latest Base System 2.3.1.a.20160512.0018

    Proceeded to do a system update and am now at the latest snapshot 2.3.1.a.20160512.0018.

    System dashboard now shows current snapshot version as well.

    Version 2.3.1-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
    built on Thu May 12 00:18:20 CDT 2016
    FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p2

    In addition, with the fix on the Update Settings page (https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6136), the options now appropriately say "Stable (Default)" and "Development Snapshots (Experimental)" for me.

    All looks good!

  • Unknown parameter in Captive Portal

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    7k Views
    rbgargaR

    I've pushed a fix

  • Nginx with IPsec widget causes 504?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    jimpJ

    Extra users and groups are fine, I was mostly curious since before 2.3 released we had observed an issue with spaces in group names causing a problem with accounts being synchronized, I thought it might have been related.

  • Failover didn't fall back to tier1 after downtime

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    H

    @cmb:

    Guessing it's already-established connections that are staying there maybe? That'd be expected.

    it kept sending new clients towards tier2 for days after the gateway event … can't have been (all) established connections

    @cmb:

    Two things influence traffic routing. Guessing your clients are being routed via a gateway group, which you can verify on the back end with:

    grep route-to /tmp/rules.debug

    The other thing would be the default gateway, for traffic matching firewall rules set to "default" rather than a gateway group. Check Diag>Routes to verify that.

    will check the rules.debug when/if it happens next

  • Port aliases entry fields are formatted for host addresses???

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    C

    Merged, thanks Phil and Steve.

  • MOVED: Frequent crashes with APU2

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • [SOLVED] - PPPoE can't set PPP-Max-Payload value

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    C

    Guessing there was something else still hanging around from the changes you made that was causing an issue. Glad it's working now.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.