pfBlockerNG

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

S

Can not see the difference between HTTP and HTTPS

• • sprinteroz

3

0
Votes

3
Posts

622
Views

S

@BBcan177:

The next version will have a new page that improves this layout…

See the following:
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/blob/devel/net/pfSense-pkg-pfBlockerNG/files/usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_sync.xml#L152-L153

The first entry is "http" and the second entry is "https"

Thanks For that… 8)
N

DNSBL and Limiter

• • northpole

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

617
Views

D

You cannot unless you use 2.4. Limiters are broken with NAT.
D

Geo update fails once per day

• • doteater

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.2k
Views

D

Upgraded from 2.2, maybe I ended up with both. I'll try removing one.
W

Rule created after reload

• • wowbagger

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

2.3k
Views

D

If you are using Squid, you need to exclude the VIP from proxy.
P

Protecting Open Ports with pfBlocker

• • pfsense newbie 0

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

2.1k
Views

R

It depends on your WAN FW rules.
By default everything is blocked by the default Block rule.

So adding single Permit rule from the "Selected GeoIPs" to the "Selected WAN Port(s)" to the "Selected Destination" should only allow those IPs to hit the open ports.
M

Possible bugs in DNSBL

• • mir

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

1.1k
Views

M

@BBcan177:

See here:

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=124945.0

In my version of the file the line number is different and I also see several lines with identical content. I will wait for an official release. But thank you anyway.
1

Certificate error - DNSBL certificate

• • 1kevinm

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

9.8k
Views

B

See here:

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=124945.0
A

Is there a graph of some kind vs log output only for pfblockerNG?

• • alottapuddin

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

807
Views

R

What about Firewall / pfBlockerNG / Alerts?
D

Pfblocker ipv4 list usage in firewall rules problem - is not a valid source IP a

• • Dm3Ch

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.7k
Views

D

Thank you for help. As I writed in first message I'm new in pfSense. :)
D

Upgrading from 2.3.2 -> 2.3.2-p1 - DNS Resolver service failed

• • dumplab

8

0
Votes

8
Posts

2.2k
Views

B

@Ibor:

@BBcan177:

The package has a feature to backup and restore the DNSBL database for RAMDisk installations.

Where can I find that feature precisely? Thanks in advance!

Its done automatically in the background when RAMDisks are enabled…. No real need to touch it...
S

DNS custom blocklist

• • spoiler

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

4.8k
Views

B

@EDinATL:

I had some particularly nasty ads popping up on my android which led me to want to manually block some ad servers via the DNSBL, so I eventually figured out how to do this today and used the method spoiler describes. I found the process a bit confusing since the 'feeds' section would seem to be for feeds and not necessarily user defined lists. At first I was manually editing a file in /var/unbound and mimicking the format used in pfb_dnsbl.conf which was cumbersome. I was glad to find this method but I wish there had been kind of clue as to how to get there. Thanks spoiler!

Its not recommended to edit the /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf file as that will get overwritten on cron updates…

The DNSBL Feeds Custom list is the easiest option to manually add Domains... You can also write the Domains to a text file accessible to the pfSense box (Local webserver) or on the pfSense box itself... See the blue infoblock icons on the DNSBL Feed tab for more details...
G

How to recover and start over?

• • guardian

6

0
Votes

6
Posts

1.3k
Views

B

@guardian:

Thanks…. that's a great help. I should be able to work though this now.

I was wondering what would happen if I:

saved a copy of /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng.xml

switched off pfBlockerNG

edited my copy, of pfblockerng.xml file

reloaded the edited copy of pfblockerng.xml to pfSense

then turned on pfBlockerNG

Assuming that the edits were minor and I didn't make a mistake would that work?

The pfblockerng.xml does not hold the configuration…. All configurations are saved in the pfSense config file:
/conf/config.xml
But editing that file should only be done with extreme care, or you risk crashing the config….

You could also setup another box and use the "Sync" feature, that will push all the configuration to another box... and vice-versa...
F

PfBlockerNG - DNSBL - Your connection is not secure

• • FlangeMonkey

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

2.5k
Views

B

Are you using Safari? I've only heard of issue with that browser :) Not really much I can do about it…. Next release will have the option to sinkhole to 0.0.0.0 which will help with this issue.... But will also negate the logging feature.... So you could also just sinkhole to 0.0.0.0 for the domains that are causing these error messages.... But will have to wait for the next release...

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=102470.msg573329#msg573329
J

Default DNSBL Firewall Rule Potentially Opening Security Holes, Please Fix!

• • JStyleG7X

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.1k
Views

B

That is an optional rule.

A permit firewall rule can be manually created to suit your network requirements…

I will try to improve this to the next release ...
K

Pfblockerng with wireless

• • k3tan

7

0
Votes

7
Posts

1.6k
Views

K

@RonpfS:

Check the DNS configuration on your Macbook, it has to use pfSense DNS resolver in order to have DNSBL blocking effective.

Done. Fixed. Thank you.
G

Forcing pfBlocker DNSBL to Reject the Connection

• • guardian

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.8k
Views

G

Thanks for the update, the problem is a firewall issue… I'll put the TL;DR at the top, and all the background below in case it's needed for some reason. (might help someone like me who is new to this stuff)

From the shell Filter Logs output... both ports are being blocked:
Rule: 1000000103,em1,match,block Port: 8081 - mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Rule: 1000000103,em1,match,block Port: 8443 - mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale

Here's the offending rule... but I don't know what to do since this rule is high up in the chain above where the GUI can have influence.
@5(1000000103) block drop in log inet all label "Default deny rule IPv4"
[ Evaluations: 813 Packets: 81 Bytes: 7740 States: 0 ]
[ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ]

How can I work around this issue since this rule isn't one that I put in?

Initial Checks - Server running / Restarted / Ports listening
Diagnostics / Status / Services Shows: dnsbl pfBlockerNG DNSBL Web Server as Running # ps aux | grep pfb_dnsbl_lighty root 36686 0.0 0.1 40260 5600 - S 5:02AM 0:00.52 /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd_pfb -f /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl_lighty.conf # sockstat -4 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root lighttpd_p 36686 5 tcp4 *:8081 *:* root lighttpd_p 36686 6 tcp4 *:8443 *:* After service stopped and restarted # sockstat -4 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root lighttpd_p 22249 5 tcp4 *:8081 *:* root lighttpd_p 22249 6 tcp4 *:8443 *:*
Raw output from Shell Menu 10) Filter Logs```
Jan 20 13:17:14 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,58770,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,45948,8081,0,S,3847975149,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:17:14 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,53302,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,45950,8081,0,S,1577797007,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:17:18 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,58771,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,45948,8081,0,S,3847975149,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:17:18 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,53303,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,45950,8081,0,S,1577797007,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:22:19 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,12996,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,50754,8443,0,S,704351713,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:22:19 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,27119,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,50758,8443,0,S,2252854924,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:22:23 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,12997,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,50754,8443,0,S,704351713,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
Jan 20 13:22:23 guardian filterlog: 5,16777216,,1000000103,em1,match,block,in,4,0x0,,64,27120,0,DF,6,tcp,60,192.168.1.10,127.0.0.1,50758,8443,0,S,2252854924,,29200,,mss;sackOK;TS;nop;wscale
**Output from: pfctl -vvsr (Edited to remove some of the noise/confidential info)**``` @@0(0) scrub on em0 all fragment reassemble [ Evaluations: 154347 Packets: 14254 Bytes: 1197540 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @1(0) scrub on em1 all fragment reassemble [ Evaluations: 140097 Packets: 14476 Bytes: 2440715 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @0(0) anchor "relayd/*" all [ Evaluations: 1617 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @1(0) anchor "openvpn/*" all [ Evaluations: 1616 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @2(0) anchor "ipsec/*" all [ Evaluations: 1617 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @3(1000000101) block drop in log quick inet from 169.254.0.0/16 to any label "Block IPv4 link-local" [ Evaluations: 1678 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @4(1000000102) block drop in log quick inet from any to 169.254.0.0/16 label "Block IPv4 link-local" [ Evaluations: 813 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @5(1000000103) block drop in log inet all label "Default deny rule IPv4" [ Evaluations: 813 Packets: 81 Bytes: 7740 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @6(1000000104) block drop out log inet all label "Default deny rule IPv4" [ Evaluations: 1653 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @7(1000000105) block drop in log inet6 all label "Default deny rule IPv6" [ Evaluations: 1678 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @8(1000000106) block drop out log inet6 all label "Default deny rule IPv6" [ Evaluations: 867 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @50(1000000301) block drop in log quick proto tcp from <sshlockout:0>to (self:8) port = ssh label "sshlockout" [ Evaluations: 1677 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @51(1000000351) block drop in log quick proto tcp from <webconfiguratorlockout:0>to (self:8) port = http label "webConfiguratorlockout" [ Evaluations: 57 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @52(1000000400) block drop in log quick from <virusprot:0>to any label "virusprot overload table" [ Evaluations: 858 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @53(11000) block drop in quick on em0 from <bogons:3757>to any label "block bogon IPv4 networks from WAN" [ Evaluations: 858 Packets: 3 Bytes: 924 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @54(11000) block drop in quick on em0 from <bogonsv6:79548>to any label "block bogon IPv6 networks from WAN" [ Evaluations: 91 Packets: 16 Bytes: 1216 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @55(1000001570) block drop in log on ! em0 inet from 192.168.0.0/24 to any [ Evaluations: 818 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @56(1000001570) block drop in log inet from 192.168.0.15 to any [ Evaluations: 810 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @57(1000001570) block drop in log on em0 inet6 from fe80::228:1aff:fee0:1004 to any [ Evaluations: 818 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @58(1000001591) pass in log on em0 proto udp from any port = bootps to any port = bootpc keep state label "allow dhcp client out WAN" [ Evaluations: 44 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @59(1000001592) pass out log on em0 proto udp from any port = bootpc to any port = bootps keep state label "allow dhcp client out WAN" [ Evaluations: 851 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @60(1000002620) block drop in log on ! em1 inet from 192.168.1.0/24 to any [ Evaluations: 1657 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @61(1000002620) block drop in log on ! em1 inet from 192.168.111.1 to any [ Evaluations: 264 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @62(1000002620) block drop in log inet from 192.168.1.1 to any [ Evaluations: 868 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @63(1000002620) block drop in log inet from 192.168.111.1 to any [ Evaluations: 860 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @68(1000002661) pass in log on lo0 inet all flags S/SA keep state label "pass IPv4 loopback" [ Evaluations: 1649 Packets: 2113 Bytes: 323093 States: 16 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 160 ] @69(1000002662) pass out log on lo0 inet all flags S/SA keep state label "pass IPv4 loopback" [ Evaluations: 338 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @70(1000002663) pass in log on lo0 inet6 all flags S/SA keep state label "pass IPv6 loopback" [ Evaluations: 346 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @71(1000002664) pass out log on lo0 inet6 all flags S/SA keep state label "pass IPv6 loopback" [ Evaluations: 168 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @72(1000002665) pass out log inet all flags S/SA keep state allow-opts label "let out anything IPv4 from firewall host itself" [ Evaluations: 1657 Packets: 2113 Bytes: 323093 States: 16 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 160 ] @73(1000002666) pass out log inet6 all flags S/SA keep state allow-opts label "let out anything IPv6 from firewall host itself" [ Evaluations: 839 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @74(1000002761) pass out log route-to (em0 192.168.0.1) inet from 192.168.0.15 to ! 192.168.0.0/24 flags S/SA keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself" [ Evaluations: 839 Packets: 3418 Bytes: 1432738 States: 73 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 634 ] @75(10000) pass in log quick on em1 proto tcp from any to (em1:3) port = http flags S/SA keep state label "anti-lockout rule" [ Evaluations: 1709 Packets: 2275 Bytes: 770250 States: 10 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 13 ] @76(10000) pass in log quick on em1 proto tcp from any to (em1:3) port = ssh flags S/SA keep state label "anti-lockout rule" [ Evaluations: 117 Packets: 4107 Bytes: 1578034 States: 2 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 5 ] @77(0) anchor "userrules/*" all [ Evaluations: 1580 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @78(1770002729) pass quick on em1 inet from any to 192.168.111.1 flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: pfB_DNSBL_Allow_access_to_VIP" [ Evaluations: 1691 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @79(1770008293) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_dnsblip:46>label "USER_RULE: pfB_DNSBLIP AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @80(1770008377) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_ethreats:3223>label "USER_RULE: pfB_ETHREATS AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @81(1770008328) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_rw_ipbl:10627>label "USER_RULE: pfB_RW_IPBL AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @82(1770008734) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_sh_ipv4:60>label "USER_RULE: pfB_SH_IPv4 AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @83(1770008690) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_level_1:167115>label "USER_RULE: pfB_Level_1 AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @84(1770008714) block return log quick on em1 inet from any to <pfb_level_2:137>label "USER_RULE: pfB_Level_2 AR" [ Evaluations: 581 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @85(1469301982) block drop quick on em0 inet6 all label "USER_RULE: Keep IPv6 Noise Out of The Logs" [ Evaluations: 1691 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @86(1469301982) block drop quick on em1 inet6 all label "USER_RULE: Keep IPv6 Noise Out of The Logs" [ Evaluations: 1015 Packets: 8 Bytes: 512 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @87(1469300765) block drop in quick on em0 inet6 all label "USER_RULE: Noise Block IPv6_WAN-Keeps Log Clean" [ Evaluations: 356 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @88(0) block drop in quick on em0 inet6 from <easyruleblockhostswan:2>to any label "USER_RULE: Easy Rule: Blocked from Firewall Log View" [ Evaluations: 0 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @89(1483770230) block drop in quick on em1 inet6 all label "USER_RULE: Noise Block IPv6_LAN-Keeps Log Clean" [ Evaluations: 356 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @98(1469733859) pass in quick on em1 inet proto tcp from 192.168.111.1 to 192.168.1.1 port = 3000 flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Allow NTOPNG" [ Evaluations: 3 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ---------------------------------------- @99(1468341693) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.1 port = domain flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Allow pfSense to handle DNS requests" [ Evaluations: 0 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @100(1468341693) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto udp from any to 192.168.1.1 port = domain keep state label "USER_RULE: Allow pfSense to handle DNS requests" [ Evaluations: 544 Packets: 1062 Bytes: 72729 States: 124 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 532 ] @101(1468981713) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any port = http flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Web Traffic" [ Evaluations: 47 Packets: 27 Bytes: 21493 States: 1 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 1 ] @102(1468981713) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any port = https flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Web Traffic" [ Evaluations: 34 Packets: 375 Bytes: 94278 States: 2 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 8 ] ---------------------------------------- @103(1468981713) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto tcp from 192.168.111.1 to any port = http flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Web Traffic" [ Evaluations: 26 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] @104(1468981713) pass in log quick on em1 inet proto tcp from 192.168.111.1 to any port = https flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: Web Traffic" [ Evaluations: 1 Packets: 0 Bytes: 0 States: 0 ] [ Inserted: pid 55703 State Creations: 0 ] ----------------------------------------</easyruleblockhostswan:2></pfb_level_2:137></pfb_level_1:167115></pfb_sh_ipv4:60></pfb_rw_ipbl:10627></pfb_ethreats:3223></pfb_dnsblip:46></bogonsv6:79548></bogons:3757></virusprot:0></webconfiguratorlockout:0></sshlockout:0>
G

DNSBL Virtual IP inconsistent - How can I make everything refresh [SOLVED]

• • guardian

2

0
Votes

2
Posts

742
Views

B

Select "Force Reload" in the update tab
G

Problem with pfBlockerNG List - How can I fix it? [SOLVED]

• • guardian

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

1.8k
Views

B

Firehol is converting those Domain based lists into an IP format… I'd not recommend that... The pfBlockerNG package has an IP and a Domain section.... so best to use the applicable format (IP or DNSBL)...

Yes hpHosts has individual Feeds, or the combined feed linked above... Take a look at their website for further details.
G

BBcan177 Block Lists

• • guardian

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

1.7k
Views

B

@guardian:

Can you give us any idea of how they are compiled (source) so we know if they are a good match for our use case?

Take a look at the Gist URLs… it will show a comment line for the source(s)...
P

PfBlockerNG error on package update

• • Phil.Scarr

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

762
Views

G

I'll certainly defer to the developers, but I doubt that it will cause any problems.

119 / 127