• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

SMTP notification uses default gateway instead of IPSEC

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
17 Posts 6 Posters 2.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F
    Fabio Giacobbe @chamilton_ccn
    last edited by Sep 7, 2020, 2:14 PM

    @chamilton_ccn

    Hi,

    I have the same problem, I tried your solution but it doesn't work.

    has anyone solved the problem?

    Thanks

    fabio

    C 1 Reply Last reply Sep 8, 2020, 1:09 PM Reply Quote 0
    • F
      Fabio Giacobbe @stephenw10
      last edited by Sep 7, 2020, 3:41 PM

      @stephenw10

      these are our GW

      f68b41cb-2f88-4a56-8dfc-4e405c65e139-image.png

      SMTP is 172.16.43.254

      this is the static route

      10ea0a64-6872-4523-8307-05bdab5bb90a-image.png

      disabled because is not working.

      fabio

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by Sep 7, 2020, 4:16 PM

        That route should be a subnet not an address. Use /32 there if you want a single IP.

        Can we see the IPSec Phase 2 config? Is it actually carrying that?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • F
          Fabio Giacobbe
          last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 8:23 AM

          Hi Steve,

          thanks a lot for your help.

          I try to explain better:

          The problem is on our PFsense Firewall installed on our China Plant; We donโ€™t have a ipsec VPN tunnel, but we have a dedicated line for our Italy plant.

          So the PFsense has a default gateway for the local traffic, and an Interface for the traffic to the IT LAN with a static route.

          This is the logical schema:

          b0763419-dc90-4b33-abfc-9f441140b668-image.png

          These are the interfaces:

          9729365a-4407-4a71-a1ef-237dca4ae535-image.png

          gatewas

          bc40af59-09e7-4a17-9299-b08a1ccc9278-image.png

          static route to IT LAN

          a3dcfdfd-3ddc-4326-be8c-36f5e033f384-image.png

          everything is working well, but the SMTP notification NOT.

          We have a SMTP gateway server on the IT LAN and we have to use it.

          SMTP server: 172.16.43.254

          If I try to ping from firewall it fails:

          3237849d-9c1b-48f2-97b7-79827e70745f-image.png

          but if I choose the interface the ping is OK:

          b4944f15-e6d2-4e97-b752-8acf626e9bc1-image.png

          the solution should be can choose from which interface to start the SMTP connection, but I don't know if it is possible.

          If I activated the gateway as suggested:

          c0ac702b-bbb5-4a33-a868-514e27062eb1-image.png

          it don't works, this is the ping response:

          3783b643-5d3e-409b-b34d-4e0bbaae17d8-image.png

          also don't work ping from other hosts from LAN, but first yes.

          thanks againg for your support.

          fabio

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 11:36 AM

            Ok, then you don't need the LAN gateway or the statis route. That only applies to policy based IPSec connections. Remove them.

            With a direct routed connection as you have both smtp and ping traffic should use the system routing table to decide which gateway to use. The route you have to 172.16.40.0/22 should be sufficient, if it is in there correctly. Can we see the routing table from pfSense?

            Steve

            F 2 Replies Last reply Sep 8, 2020, 11:50 AM Reply Quote 1
            • F
              Fabio Giacobbe @stephenw10
              last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 11:50 AM

              @stephenw10 said in SMTP notification uses default gateway instead of IPSEC:

              ufficient, if it is in there correctly. Can we see the routing table from

              a9c9d6b7-b388-43a8-8bd1-a3e5d05bb603-image.png

              fabio

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 12:17 PM

                Ok, that should work.

                Maybe you have something that was already trying to connect and opened a state via the default gateway and it's still open.
                Check the state table for any states to 172.16.43.254. Delete any ICMP or SMTP that are present.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • F
                  Fabio Giacobbe @stephenw10
                  last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 12:20 PM

                  @stephenw10

                  Hi Steve,

                  I understood: it was a NAT problem!

                  For BT interface the NAT from China LAN is disabled, but other network are not trasported to Italy!

                  Now I have defined this new NAT rule:

                  9d959c64-006a-4fe6-b9df-0441cc8e96d9-image.png

                  details:

                  860b8987-a223-4177-86d1-7f6385bb2f86-image.png

                  now the ping is working:

                  1f6c0883-5d74-4aca-8131-f7534029b659-image.png

                  and also the SMTP test is OK:

                  a3c2efa9-f2f6-4bd0-99ea-870dee6b57f3-image.png

                  many thanks for your time and help!

                  I'm sorry I didn't understand earlier that the problem was somewhere else and it was a NAT problem.

                  bye

                  fabio

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 12:48 PM

                    Ah, cool. ๐Ÿ‘

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • C
                      chamilton_ccn @Fabio Giacobbe
                      last edited by Sep 8, 2020, 1:09 PM

                      @Fabio-Giacobbe The scenario I posted was specific to IPSec. But don't feel bad, we've all been in similar NAT-induced (read: confusing) situations. Glad you got it figured out!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      17 out of 17
                      • First post
                        17/17
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received