• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Ping not working on CLI or with "default" interface on GUI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
24 Posts 2 Posters 1.9k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
    last edited by Oct 26, 2023, 7:06 PM

    Hmm, do you have a Wireguard gateway defined?

    Is your default IPv4 gateway still set to automatic in System > Routing > Gateways?
    If it is try setting it to the WAN gateway.

    L 1 Reply Last reply Oct 27, 2023, 5:59 AM Reply Quote 0
    • L
      llavecita @stephenw10
      last edited by llavecita Oct 27, 2023, 6:21 AM Oct 27, 2023, 5:59 AM

      Hello again @stephenw10 . New day, new time to chase this mystery.

      I have stopped WireGuard service, but issue still persists.

      In regards to IPv4 gateway, it is not automatic - it is statically defined. It is the only Gateway in this system (no WireGuard gateways or anything extra), and it is also set as default. Puzzling.

      I have tried to add a NAT outbound rule on top of the list, selecting "any" as source on WAN interface, and translating it to the "interface address", and ping works now when not specifying an interface. But this is a dirty patch, as I assume WAN is still sending the packets with 0.0.0.0 as source, just that we are translating that address locally. On top of that, nslookup still does not work even with that workaround, ie:

      $ nslookup dns.google
      ;; UDP setup with 1.1.1.2#53(1.1.1.2) for dns.google failed: host unreachable.
      ;; UDP setup with 1.1.1.2#53(1.1.1.2) for dns.google failed: host unreachable.
      ;; UDP setup with 1.1.1.2#53(1.1.1.2) for dns.google failed: host unreachable.
      ;; UDP setup with 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9) for dns.google failed: host unreachable.
      

      And pfsense updates also don't work. So I am reverting that NAT outbound rule.

      I will continue to chase it for a few hours more and, if no luck, I will try reinstalling the system and observe behaviour when freshly installed and no config.xml restores.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L
        llavecita
        last edited by llavecita Oct 27, 2023, 6:49 AM Oct 27, 2023, 6:43 AM

        Here is some additional info, in case it helps

        $ ifconfig -a
        
        igb0: flags=8822<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        	options=4e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,NOMAP>
        	ether 3c:ec:ef:a7:22:e8
        	media: Ethernet autoselect
        	status: no carrier
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        igb1: flags=8822<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        	options=4e527bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,NOMAP>
        	ether 3c:ec:ef:a7:22:e9
        	media: Ethernet autoselect
        	status: no carrier
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        ix0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        	description: WAN
        	options=48138b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,NOMAP>
        	ether 9c:69:b4:64:96:7a
        	inet6 fe80::9e69:b4ff:fe64:967a%ix0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
        	inet 123.123.123.123(redacted) netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 123.123.123.1(redacted)
        	media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-SR <full-duplex,rxpause,txpause>)
        	status: active
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        ix1: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        	description: OPT1
        	options=48138b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER,NOMAP>
        	ether 9c:69:b4:64:96:7b
        	inet6 fe80::9e69:b4ff:fe64:967b%ix1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
        	media: Ethernet autoselect
        	status: no carrier
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
        	groups: enc
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
        	options=680003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,LINKSTATE,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
        	inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
        	inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
        	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
        	groups: lo
        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
        
        pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33152
        	groups: pflog
        
        pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
        	maxupd: 128 defer: off
        	syncok: 1
        	groups: pfsync
        
        tun_wg0: flags=80c1<UP,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1420
        	description: WG_EG
        	options=80000<LINKSTATE>
        	inet 80.80.80.1(redacted) netmask 0xffffff00
        	inet 90.90.90.1(redacted) netmask 0xffffff00
        	inet 10.95.32.99 netmask 0xffffff00
        	groups: wg WireGuard
        	nd6 options=101<PERFORMNUD,NO_DAD>
        

        I also verified that in the uploaded .pcap file, the MAC address of the source matches the one in ix0 interface.

        S 1 Reply Last reply Oct 27, 2023, 11:33 AM Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @llavecita
          last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 11:33 AM

          @llavecita said in Ping not working on CLI or with "default" interface on GUI:

          inet 123.123.123.123(redacted) netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 123.123.123.1(redacted)

          Is that the other way around? I expect the broadcast address to be .127 on a /25.

          L 1 Reply Last reply Oct 27, 2023, 11:53 AM Reply Quote 0
          • L
            llavecita @stephenw10
            last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 11:53 AM

            @stephenw10 I redacted the real values, but you are indeed correct - shown broadcast address in ifconfig for interface ix0 is a .127 (and gateway is a .126)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 12:05 PM

              Hmm, OK. We discussed this internally last night and there's nothing immediately that presents like that.

              Can I assume this behaviour survives a reboot?

              L 1 Reply Last reply Oct 27, 2023, 12:22 PM Reply Quote 0
              • L
                llavecita @stephenw10
                last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 12:22 PM

                @stephenw10 Correct, the server has been rebooted several times to no avail. I will find some time today to reinstall it from scratch, without dragging any previous config.xml, to see if behaviour persists on a fresh install. I will report back later today.

                Thanks again for your time and dedication!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 12:35 PM

                  Yeah, I really like to know what's causing that. Must be something very obscure as I see almost zero references to it.

                  L 2 Replies Last reply Oct 27, 2023, 3:16 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    llavecita @stephenw10
                    last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 3:16 PM

                    @stephenw10 I have just reinstalled the system, and zero-to-ping works well after disabling igb0/igb1, enabling ix0/ix1, and setting static IP and gateway for the relevant WAN interface. This means the problem lies in my restored config.xml, which seems to be breaking things although it comes from another functional system which is in production. The other system is virtualised, and not a dedicated environment, so I only changed "vtnet0" for "ix0" in the ported config.xml, but perhaps additional changes are needed.

                    I will try to restore a couple of config.xml's to see if results differ, and if it still breaks I will manually configure this system. It would be great to know the exact cause of the issue though!

                    Thanks again for your assistance and dedication. I will post again if I have additional findings which are relevant.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • L
                      llavecita @stephenw10
                      last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 3:53 PM

                      @stephenw10 More wizardry. So, before reinstalling the system, I downloaded the config.xml. Now, after reinstalling it I restored exactly the same config.xml (no changes at all!), and now everything works: ping and nslookup, updates, etc. So I cannot confirm my config.xml was at fault!

                      The good thing is that everything works now, and no manual configuration is required (phew...). The bad side is that we do not know what was (seriously) wrong. But maybe instead of spending 3 days troubleshooting, next time I could try to reinstall first, and if the same result happens, then troubleshoot. A learning experience :D.

                      Thanks again!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by Oct 27, 2023, 3:56 PM

                        Hmm, so something dynamic that survives a reboot but is not in the config. 🤔

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        24 out of 24
                        • First post
                          24/24
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                          consent.not_received