SG-1100: unexpexcted reboots and vm_fault in logs - how to diagnose?
-
Yes, I expect them to be the same but since we are currently in summer time it seemed suspect. Especially as my own logs are in local time, which is BST for me, but that is not included in the pfblocker log.
What version are you using?
-
@stephenw10 I just learned that I need to update pfblockerNG manually. I updated it to the latest devel version (3.2.0_17)
-
@stephenw10 I managed to have a device attached to the USB console while it crashed. Could you give me a hint on where the dump starts and where it ends?
before the boot logs I see a lot of these:
Tracing command dhclient pid 50093 tid 100224 td 0xffff00009cab5640 sched_switch() at sched_switch+0x890 mi_switch() at mi_switch+0xf8 sleepq_catch_signals() at sleepq_catch_signals+0x424 sleepq_wait_sig() at sleepq_wait_sig+0xc _cv_wait_sig() at _cv_wait_sig+0x10c seltdwait() at seltdwait+0x110 kern_select() at kern_select+0x81c sys_select() at sys_select+0x60 do_el0_sync() at do_el0_sync+0x634 handle_el0_sync() at handle_el0_sync+0x48 --- exception, esr 0x56000000 `` -
Ok well that's definitely a kernel panic.
What you want from the start of the panic output. So the initial panic string and the backtrace (
bt>)So as an example:
0:kdb.enter.default> run pfs db:1:pfs> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100007 td 0xfffffe00119bd720 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x32/frame 0xfffffe00101a86c0 vpanic() at vpanic+0x182/frame 0xfffffe00101a8710 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfffffe00101a8770 trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x409/frame 0xfffffe00101a87d0 trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0x4f/frame 0xfffffe00101a8830 calltrap() at calltrap+0x8/frame 0xfffffe00101a8830 --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff80f66369, rsp = 0xfffffe00101a8900, rbp = 0xfffffe00101a8930 --- pppoe_findsession() at pppoe_findsession+0x79/frame 0xfffffe00101a8930 ng_pppoe_rcvdata_ether() at ng_pppoe_rcvdata_ether+0x461/frame 0xfffffe00101a89b0 ng_apply_item() at ng_apply_item+0x2bf/frame 0xfffffe00101a8a40 ng_snd_item() at ng_snd_item+0x28e/frame 0xfffffe00101a8a80 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x212/frame 0xfffffe00101a8ab0 ether_nh_input() at ether_nh_input+0x353/frame 0xfffffe00101a8b10 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0xb9/frame 0xfffffe00101a8b60 ether_input() at ether_input+0x69/frame 0xfffffe00101a8bc0 ether_demux() at ether_demux+0x9e/frame 0xfffffe00101a8bf0 ether_nh_input() at ether_nh_input+0x353/frame 0xfffffe00101a8c50 netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0xb9/frame 0xfffffe00101a8ca0 ether_input() at ether_input+0x69/frame 0xfffffe00101a8d00 iflib_rxeof() at iflib_rxeof+0xbdb/frame 0xfffffe00101a8e00 _task_fn_rx() at _task_fn_rx+0x72/frame 0xfffffe00101a8e40 gtaskqueue_run_locked() at gtaskqueue_run_locked+0x15d/frame 0xfffffe00101a8ec0 gtaskqueue_thread_loop() at gtaskqueue_thread_loop+0xc3/frame 0xfffffe00101a8ef0 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x7e/frame 0xfffffe00101a8f30 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe/frame 0xfffffe00101a8f30 --- trap 0x107a772c, rip = 0x11d295625b1b31a1, rsp = 0xf02460003c98dfb3, rbp = 0x41abfa0065646f --- db:1:pfs> show registers cs 0x20 ds 0x3b es 0x3b fs 0x13 gs 0x1b ss 0x28 rax 0x12 rcx 0x1 rdx 0xfffffe00101a82e0 rbx 0x100 rsp 0xfffffe00101a86c0 rbp 0xfffffe00101a86c0 rsi 0 rdi 0xffffffff83183f98 vt_conswindow+0x10 r8 0 r9 0x1c200001 r10 0xffffffff83183f88 vt_conswindow r11 0x20 r12 0x2cdc1f807000 r13 0xfffffe00101a8840 r14 0xfffffe00101a8750 r15 0xfffffe00119bd720 rip 0xffffffff80dd82f2 kdb_enter+0x32 rflags 0x82 kdb_enter+0x32: movq $0,0x27bd313(%rip) db:1:pfs> show pcpu cpuid = 0 dynamic pcpu = 0xbf6800 curthread = 0xfffffe00119bd720: pid 0 tid 100007 critnest 1 "if_io_tqg_0" curpcb = 0xfffffe00119bdc40 fpcurthread = none idlethread = 0xfffffe00119bf3a0: tid 100003 "idle: cpu0" self = 0xffffffff84010000 curpmap = 0xffffffff83549750 tssp = 0xffffffff84010384 rsp0 = 0xfffffe00101a9000 kcr3 = 0x8000000081c3e002 ucr3 = 0xffffffffffffffff scr3 = 0x1958cac7f gs32p = 0xffffffff84010404 ldt = 0xffffffff84010444 tss = 0xffffffff84010434 curvnet = 0xfffff800011c7a00 -
@stephenw10 thanks! Got it - what should I do with it?
-
You can upload it here and I'll check it:
https://nc.netgate.com/nextcloud/s/sFoGNTrcoDypsx5 -
@stephenw10 done :-)
-
Ok. Backtrace:
db:1:pfs> bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100131 td 0xffff00008ae04640 db_trace_self() at db_trace_self db_stack_trace() at db_stack_trace+0x120 db_command() at db_command+0x368 db_script_exec() at db_script_exec+0x1ac db_command() at db_command+0x368 db_script_exec() at db_script_exec+0x1ac db_script_kdbenter() at db_script_kdbenter+0x5c db_trap() at db_trap+0xfc kdb_trap() at kdb_trap+0x314 handle_el1h_sync() at handle_el1h_sync+0x18 --- exception, esr 0xf2000000 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x4c vpanic() at vpanic+0x1e0 panic() at panic+0x48 vm_fault() at vm_fault+0x1780 vm_fault_trap() at vm_fault_trap+0xa0 data_abort() at data_abort+0xc8 handle_el1h_sync() at handle_el1h_sync+0x18 --- exception, esr 0x8600000f $d.2() at $d.2+0xc29 range_tree_add_impl() at range_tree_add_impl+0x8c metaslab_alloc_dva() at metaslab_alloc_dva+0xf48 metaslab_alloc() at metaslab_alloc+0xcc zio_dva_allocate() at zio_dva_allocate+0xb8 zio_execute() at zio_execute+0x58 taskqueue_run_locked() at taskqueue_run_locked+0x194 taskqueue_thread_loop() at taskqueue_thread_loop+0x134 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x8c fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x18Mmm, that looks like a drive or filesystem issue. Did you reinstall this clean? If not I would probably try that to rule out any filesytstem issue.
-
@stephenw10 I did install it clean some 2 months ago, but I can retry - will come back after that.
I already suspected something with storage in the past, but couldn't find any hint that shows a failing storage (I did check usage level as in the docs for the SG 1100, but that seems good). -
Quick update to anyone stumbling on this:
The reboots kept coming in an irregular way. What seemed to help was reducing the number of feeds for pfBlockerNG (even though memory did not seem to be the probelm). At some point I installed 24.11 RC and then 24.11 final. That seemed to finally do the trick: I had an uptime of some 9 days.For me the issue is closed, since I recently upgraded to a SG-2100 that I was able to get for a good price. Interestingly even though memory never seemd to be the problem now I see the CPU also running at a lower average (.2 vs .5 before).
