Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    J
    @qupfer What did I bang my head over this strange 502 issue. Your solution did it! Thank you so much, even 2.5 years later!
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    M
    Hi, I had a problem with my home network today, so I checked pfsense and discovered that suricata had blocked the wan ip. After some tests and triggering some suricata alerts, the wan ip was blocked. I restarted pfsense and ran some more tests, but the problem no longer occurred. I then checked the wan interface settings and indeed the ip list does not include the wan ip, both now that it's working and before, when it was blocked. I'm using pfsense 2.8.0 and suricata 7.0.8_2. I use PPPoE to access the Internet.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    fireodoF
    @tinfoilmatt said in Failed or invalid Mime Type: [application/SIMH-tape-data|0]: (ASN data is IPinfo, not Maxmind) Thats correct but "GeoLite2-Country" is from Maxmind ... (that confused me) I'm considering simply adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list to test. Thats what i tought too ... I'll try when I have the time for it ... Edit: I can confirm - adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list at line 257 in /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc did the trick - no more error! Edit: OK, problem resolved but I would like to know, whats the cause for that error! (SIMH-tape-data sounds like a "blast from the past" ...) Thanks a lot!
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    GertjanG
    @jimp Done. I was on acme.sh 1.0 (25.07.1) and a downgrade was proposed. Now, the issue is gone.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    602 Posts
    S
    Hi guys, Just $0.01, because I faced same issue on pfSense+ 24.07.1 upgrade, but I think root cause may NOT be pfSense+ per se. To my understanding (which may be wrong): Tailscale uses 2 keys: node auth key - by default expires after 180 days. We do not see it, but you can disable its expiration and we normally do that, right? So node registration should not expire after 180 days and re-authentication should not be necessary. preauth key - it is valid for maximum 90 days and you input it to VPN / Tailscale / Authentication as Pre-authentication Key (eg. tskey-auth-123456789011CNTRL-2pz1kCcaSjJucckK7U5Xbz123456a890). Remember that this key is valid for no longer than 90 days. So usually when you upgrade pfSense+ (=> Tailscale upgrade) this key is well expired. Device can not (re)authenticate using it - it is expired: - not logged in, last login error=invalid key: API key does not exist (because key that pfSense+ tried to use is expired!) Tailscale says that device may sometimes require re-authentication. Here is info from Tailscale KB: Auth keys Auth keys are available for all plans. Pre-authentication keys (called auth keys) let you register new nodes without needing to sign in using a web browser. This is most useful when spinning up containers, IoT devices, or using infrastructure-as-code systems like Terraform. An auth key authenticates a device as the user who generated the key. That is, if Alice generates an auth key, and uses it to add a server to her tailnet, then that device is authenticated with Alice's identity. Think of it as logging into a device. However, if you use tags with an auth key, after a device logs in as the user who generated the auth key, the device assumes the identity of the auth key's tags. As an alternative to directly creating auth keys, consider using an OAuth client. You can use an OAuth client and the Tailscale API to programmatically create auth keys. Types of auth keys Auth keys can either be: One-off, for one-time use. They can only be used to connect a device or server one time. This is meant for situations where you can't authenticate on the device yourself, so using a key is more practical. For example, a cloud server might use a one-off key to connect. Reusable, for multiple uses. They can be used to connect multiple devices. For example, multiple instances of an on-premises database might use a reusable key to connect. Be very careful with reusable keys! These can be very dangerous if stolen. They're best kept in a key vault product specially designed for the purpose. Key expiry An auth key automatically expires after the number of days you specified when you generated the key. You can choose the number of days, between 1 and 90 inclusive, for the key expiry. If you don't specify an expiry time, the auth key will expire after the maximum of 90 days. If you want to continue using an auth key after it expires, you need to generate a new key. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device by using the Machines page of the admin console and by using the Update device key method in the Tailscale API. If an auth key expires, any device authorized by it remains authorized until its node key expires. Each device generates a node key when you log in to Tailscale and uses it to identify itself to the tailnet. By default, node keys automatically expire every 180 days. You can change the default node key expiry from the Key Expiry section of the Device management page of the admin console. Learn more about key management. You can use tags as "service accounts" and have some devices NOT bound to any specific user (removal of user removes devices he own). You can define 1 or multiple tag owners (users managing tag). Tag vs. user authentication Tags are parallel to user authentication. They serve the same role as a user account, except they're intended for service-based devices, such as a web server or an app connector. As a result, it's impossible for a user account identity and a tag identity to exist on the same device. Applying a tag to a device previously authenticated with a user account removes the user account. Similarly, authenticating a device with a user account removes all tags from the device. Because tags are intended for non-user devices, they have qualities and limitations that make them unsuitable for authenticating end-user devices, such as a MacBook or a mobile device. For example, devices with a tag-based identity cannot use SSH to connect to a device with a user-based identity. Key expiry When you apply a tag to a device for the first time and authenticate it, the tagged device's key expiry is disabled by default. If you re-authenticate a device tagged before March 10, 2022, its expiry will be disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device from the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or the Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device from the Machines page of the admin console or by using the Tailscale API. Key expiry for tagged devices Key expiry for tagged devices is disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device through the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. That is, if it is enabled, it stays enabled; and if it is disabled, it stays disabled. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can find recently revoked or expired keys on the Keys page of the admin console. Best practices Depending on what devices you're authenticating, consider using an auth key that is: Ephemeral, for authenticating ephemeral nodes as part of short-lived workloads. Because node keys do not persist when a workload restarts, they reconnect as a different node. Tailscale automatically removes inactive nodes. For example, containers or Lambda functions should use an ephemeral key to connect. Pre-approved, for servers. If your tailnet has device approval enabled, this lets you add a device to your tailnet without further authorization. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a pre-approved auth key to connect in a network with device approval. Pre-signed, for nodes whose auth keys are signed locally on a signing node, which applies to tailnets with Tailnet Lock enabled. You can make an auth key (created by any means) pre-signed only by using the tailscale lock sign CLI command. Tagged, for servers. You can automatically apply a tag to a device by including the tag in the auth key. Access control policies restricting the device's permissions based on the tag apply after provisioning the device. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a tagged auth key to connect. I am personally going to try Tagged (preauth) key and all my pfSense+ exit nodes (3) are already tagged as "router". So I will remove nodes from tailnet and re-add with Tagged key providing "router" tag. I read that Tailscale on software upgrade MAY (rarely) REQUIRE device reauthentication. Having in mind that normal preauth keys expire after 90 days you should provide valid (non-expired) preauth key before pfSense+ upgrade? Eventually maybe if routers are tagged and preauth key is tagged then there will be no problem? Currently pfSense+ does not ask us about expiration date of Preauth Key, so it can not remind us that key is expired and it may lead to problems. When valid key is needed (reauthentication) then device will fail with the message we see. I would not blame pfSense+ yet, because I think Tailscale may require device reauthorisation sometimes and message you got tells you are trying to use expired key for authentication thus process is failing. I agree reauthentications should be rare or non-needed, but we may not know everything here.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    696 Topics
    4k Posts
    Q
    Hi Team, I’m running pfSense Plus 25.07.1 with TorGuard WireGuard VPN as my primary tunnel for LAN traffic (for best possible speeds). The tunnel is mostly working now, but I had to go through several fixes and I’m still not confident the configuration is stable. Here’s what I’ve run into: TorGuard support originally helped set up the WireGuard client. It worked fine for about a day, but then the Unbound DNS Resolver stopped working. Even when I re-enabled Unbound manually, LAN clients still couldn’t reach the internet. The main issue seemed to be when switching between WAN (ISP public IP) and the VPN IP. Sometimes traffic didn’t switch over properly, and at one point pfSense even generated a crash report during the switch and restarted. To fix it, I reset the LAN firewall rule so that LAN traffic would route through the VPN gateway when active, and fall back to WAN when the VPN was down. After that, I was able to toggle the VPN on/off without pfSense crashing, and traffic correctly switched between ISP IP and VPN IP. At this point it works, but I don’t think the setup is completely stable. I’d like to ask for guidance on: How to make sure Unbound stays reliable when the VPN gateway goes up/down. Best practices for LAN firewall rules so clients use the VPN when it’s up, and either fall back to WAN or get blocked (kill switch) when the VPN is down. Correctly assigning DNS servers to WAN and VPN gateways. At the moment, in System → General Setup, I don’t see the gateway dropdown next to DNS entries, so my DNS servers are just “floating” with no interface binding. If anyone has suggestions, or can point me to a clean reference configuration for WireGuard + Unbound + proper DNS gateway assignment, I’d greatly appreciate it. I'd really like to have a conference with someone and go over this. I'd like to give them access using RustDesk or TeamViewer so we can talk and they can show me things. I am legally blind so I am one inch from the screen. I've also uploaded the crashdump so you can look over it. I've also been using AI, but I keep going in circles with it, so it's not perfect. Thanks in advance! Warm Regards, Jamestextdump.tar.0
  • Possible BUG in Snort custom.rules

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    BBcan177B
    @bmeeks: I submitted the fix for this problem in the current Snort 2.9.5.6 pkg v3.0.4 Pull Request that is posted on GitHub now.  So as soon as the Core Team guys review and approve the request, this fix will be posted.  Here is the link to the request:  https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-packages/pull/582 Bill Thanks Bill. I guess there is the changelog. Unfortunately after this upgrade, I dont see any of these changes. There are no new icons in the Alerts Tab, Clicking on a remove Block still brings it to the Lan interface. The Rules tab is not updated. Maybe this is still the previous release? Let me know if you want me to test anything. Thanks.
  • SNORT - Unusual ping detected

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    Thanks a lot Bill..!
  • Squid 3 package status

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    809 Views
    No one has replied
  • Haproxy 1.4 content isn't secure

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    Indeed like Jason writes its likely the page contains contents that it tries to read contents from http://something..  you might also want to give haproxy-devel a try as it natively supports ssl. And also as a possible workaround if the webserver url generation cannot be changed can have the backend connection created over ssl to the webservers.
  • PPP Autodisconnect/Reconnect

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    631 Views
    No one has replied
  • Bug - Squid package log dir

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    473 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    It has to do with how the Netgate release of pfSense seems to be limiting the Zabbix2 packages to the 2.0.x branch. Perhaps the init scripts are not versioned or something. Installing the zabbix2-proxy-2.0.8 pkg v0.7_1 package but pulling the init script that has been updated for zabbix2-proxy-2.2.1 pkg v0.8_0. I know the Netgate release package repository lags behind a little, perhaps I can help get the zabbix2.2 updates fully tested so they can be released to the Netgate release.
  • Sending "upsmon -c fsd" to NUT (Network UPS Tools).

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Install squid does nothing :(

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    I
    Thanks… And now it's worked. Really weird because I've installed and uninstalled many times, suddenly it appears. So I'm a happy camper, but odd that the GUI should report a successful installation when that doesn't seem to be the reality.
  • Squid3

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    715 Views
    No one has replied
  • Need help with a redirect loop in squidguard!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    723 Views
    No one has replied
  • Snort blocks many websites badly

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    5k Views
    bmeeksB
    @A999: Hi, I'm setting up a fresh pfSense box for proxying http traffic at my office. I installed Squid3-dev and snort (updated VRT community rules and ETOpen rules). I disabled "block offenders" in snort but as time goes by, it's still blocking many normal websites like: AWS, reddit, and many more photos sharing hosts. Description for those blocked hosts are "UNKNOWN METHOD" or "DOUBLE DECODING ATTACK" or "NO CONTENT-LENGTH" OR "TRANSFER-ENCODING IN HTTP RESPONSE". It would be great if somebody tell me what's wrong here and what I'd do to improvise. Thanks. Edit: snort are enabled on WAN interface, and it's also blocking download packages from psfense.org for same reason. Did you remember to stop/start the Snort process after you changed the blocking option from "on" to "off"?  If you uncheck "block offenders" and restart Snort, it won't block anything.  It will print alerts, but it won't block. The alerts you listed are considered to be common, known false positives from the HTTP_INSPECT preprocessor.  There is a long thread containing suggestions from experienced Snort users for suppressing false positives.  Here is a link:  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,56267.msg300473.html#msg300473 Bill
  • Squid Package status X how come ?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    839 Views
    T
    Have you just installed (downloaded and added it to the menu system) it from the package menu? Then you have to go to the "Services" –> "Proxy Server" menu option and at least press the "save" button there at the bottom. This will basically create the config file and start squid.
  • Snort time from alert to block

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    7k Views
    BBcan177B
    @jandohrmann: alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> any 25 (msg:"SMTP AUTH LOGON brute force attempt"; content:"AUTH LOGIN"; nocase; classtype:suspicious-login; sid:1000001; rev:2;) I didn't see the "content:"AUTH LOGIN" in the rule above. My bad. Thought you were blocking port 25 completely at first glance.
  • Snort clearing block hosts ahead of schedule

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    10k Views
    R
    Then…  you've made my point. But thanks for sharing what you have. Rick
  • Squid Reverse Proxy

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Snort doesn't stay running

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    719 Views
    bmeeksB
    @ethos101: Every time Snort updates its rules we need to manually start the service again.  The log says it's restarted, but it is not.  Where else can I look for trouble signs? Thanks Look in the system log for clues.  My first suspicion is a disabled preprocessor, and the new rule update suddenly has introduced a dependent rule.  Look for any messages about "unrecognized or unknown rule option" in the system log. Did you disable any preprocessors on the PREPROCESSORS tab, or have you left everything at the defaults from the initial installation? Bill
  • Postfix - suddenly stopped working?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    X
    I got the same issue and selecting interface(s) in the "Listen on" list instead of "listen on all interfaces/ip addresses" solves it.
  • So many issues

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    bmeeksB
    @MilesDeep: I will do what you recommend with regards to rule sets. One last thing on this topic,  you write:  As for your question on IPS Policy (Balanced, Security, Connectivity), that only shows up when you have enabled the download of the Snort VRT rules. We have enabled to download the Snort VRT rules.  Where do I (globally, I hope) set the IPS Policy? You can select an IPS Policy on the RULE CATEGORIES tab for the Interface in the Snort menu.  So click Services…Snort and then select the Snort interface you want to edit by clicking the small e icon next to the interface.  Next, in the bottom row of tabs that appears, click RULE CATEGORIES.  You should see a dropdown selection like the one pictured in the attachment to this post. Bill [image: IPS-Policy-Selection.jpg] [image: IPS-Policy-Selection.jpg_thumb]
  • HAVP + Snort: connect() failed: Operation not permitted

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    bmeeksB
    @Zosimo: Current setup pfSense 2.1-RELEASE (i386) FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11 snort 2.9.5.5 pkg v3.0.3 HAVP antivirus 0.91_1 pkg v1.01 squid Network 2.7.9 pkg v.4.3.3 Squid is configured as a transparent proxy, and HAVP as the parent for Squid (and set accordingly in the config). Snort is not configured to block sites when an alert is triggered, but is apparently doing so anyways. The system log files show Feb 12 13:22:12 havp[55759]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:22:01 havp[44820]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:22:00 havp[44820]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:21:59 havp[44820]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:21:08 havp[77462]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:21:06 havp[78132]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:21:05 havp[44591]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:19:37 havp[57273]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 12 13:17:21 havp[55759]: connect() failed: Operation not permitted It would seem that I am having the same issue as the OP in this post: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,18725.0.html. Was this ever fixed? Snort should not block anything if you have the "block offenders" checkbox unchecked on the Interface tab.  If you think Snort is the cause, simply stop the Snort process by clicking the green arrow icon on the Snort Interfaces tab and waiting for it to turn to a red X.  At that point Snort is dead and not blocking anymore.  Try your connection then.  If it still fails, then Snort is not your problem. Another way to check if Snort is the cause is to click on Diagnostics…Tables and select the snort2c table in the dropdown list.  If no IP addresses show up, then Snort is not blocking.  All blocked IPs by Snort get put in the snort2c table that you can view under Diagnostics…Tables.  If an IP address is not in that table, then Snort is not blocking that IP. Bill
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.