Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    I
    @andrew_cb said in haproxy 0.63_2 weird behavior, edits not working: @iSagen @TheCyborgWeasel The issue is likely the same as in https://forum.netgate.com/topic/178348/haproxy-backend-port-changes-are-not-applied/ Try adding load-server-state-from-file none to the Advanced Settings > Backend pass thru section of each backend. Great! I will do this.
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    @NRgia said in Suricata on Pfsense: @bmeeks Thank you for what you did for Snort or Suricata. I'm not sure what you want me to do on Redmine, due to is a bug tracker. My question is for Product Management, which I will ask it here to be public: What is the plan for these 2 packages, Suricata and Snort? Thank you Yes, Redmine is for both bug reports and feature requests. Asking for the Suricata binary to be updated to the latest 7.0.11 version from upstream is a legitimate Redmine request. I would suggest simply asking for the binary version update instead of asking about future Netgate strategy (such as the support plans for the packages). Strategy discussions typically don't get very far because they deal with proprietary information or plans that a company may not want to publicly discuss. Redmine is where the Netgate developer team tracks all the code changes they make for pfSense. They will see Redmine reports much quicker than a forum post.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    keyserK
    @jrey Thank you so much for the detailed explanation and help. I will adapt and apply the patch to move the job timing like suggested at 01:35 Are you just a user or are you also involved in package maintenance on one or more packages?
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    495 Topics
    3k Posts
    M
    @raidflex said in updating to acme 1.0 breaks system beyond repair: need to restore from backup: maybe uninstall Crowdsec when applying other updates first. It seems like it doesn't help at least from what I see on my system... it changes something.. so it must be definitely reported to their github. I have never experienced that before and crowsec was installed.. maybe with 2.8.0 something have changed
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    597 Posts
    ryan.goodfellowR
    Upgraded 25.07 and Tailscale is broken in the way users here describe. I can manually log in using sudo /usr/local/bin/tailscale login, but the tailscale service in pfSense does not pick this up and restarting the service clobbers the login state. Given 16004 was logged 7 months ago with zero activity, this is an indication that Netgate devices no longer support Tailscale.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    693 Topics
    4k Posts
    lvrmscL
    Strangely enough, checking the system 4 days later, I now see that Wireguard service is reported running! The last thing I did 4 days ago was to disable Wireguard service monitoring by the Service Watchdog. Anyway, even when it was reported stopped at first, 4 days ago, the tunnels were working flawlessly. Very strange. I will keep an eye on it.
  • No upgrade icons

    Moved
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    @bmeeks OK ... I understand
  • Nmap package

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Hmm, looks like that was changed here: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commit/7f64c9db1a0f5c0ffc18afe7a9f7a9b9f82f9c67 Not sure how you ended up with both though.
  • Issue with Pfsense plus 22.05

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @justplayinn Have not yet upgraded. Have you tried removing and reinstalling the packages? There is no "downgrade" path. To accomplish that you'll need to reinstall and restore your config file from backup.
  • Latest Cron update prevents special strings like @reboot

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @jimp https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13309
  • iPerf3 not working in GUI

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    @steveits Less for benchmarking and more for stressing. I want the CPU cycles included in that test. I can run iperf from desktop to server over the vpn, but this I want to see if HIS internet is to blame. I have a number of clients all on Verizon FIOS all claiming their clouds are slow. Verizon is very fractured right now and they lack people who can understand what you are talking about in the support space.
  • HAproxy authelia

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    U
    Got it working like a week ago after a while not thinking about it. For future reference I have created a manual. It was quite hard to find out the what and how. But it can be done from gui. https://dkict.com/pfsense-haproxy-authelia/ Pfsense haproxy + authelia
  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    4k Views
    No one has replied
  • Arpwatch - update-ethercodes cronjob necessary?

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    712 Views
    No one has replied
  • Wireguard and Netgate SG-1100

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @scourtney2000 But if you're telling the ping which source to use and it works.... sounds like a route issue. Can you post pics of your configs, gateways and routes?
  • pfSense acting as SMTP Relay via port 25

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    4k Views
    johnpozJ
    @flat4 you don't sign up for it - you set it up.. https://github.com/Tautulli/Tautulli/wiki/Notification-Agents-Guide#email You will notice the gmail instructions call out using app password Then you setup which of your users get the "newsletter" I use BCC instead of CC so that users don't see all the others users email addresses.
  • LCDproc

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    917 Views
    abliznoA
    @eddy2020 its a bug, you can fix it by manually changing the config file https://forum.netgate.com/topic/150856/lcdproc-on-watchguard-xtm-5-series-with-pfsense-2-4-4/25?_=1655488887623
  • SSL certificate subject doesn't match host repo01.atx.netgate.com

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    JonathanLeeJ
    @steveits this has been resolved in the background it is working again.
  • Packages unavailable and Upgrades failing when using IPv6

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    547 Views
    No one has replied
  • node_exporter for ARM

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @bdossantos said in node_exporter for ARM: node_exporter Hello, anyone would like to use node_exporter on their arm negate ? :/
  • Snort alert only on priority 1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    bmeeksB
    @hehob60672 said in Snort alert only on priority 1: Is there any way to make Snort generate alerts only for rules with priority 1? No, unfortunately the PRIORITY field is not an option for alert suppression/thresholding. If the only rules you want to even inspect traffic are those marked as PRIORITY 1, then you could perhaps use the pattern matching features on the SID MGMT tab to select only rules matching that criteria to enable.
  • squid proxy and squid guard

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    591 Views
    No one has replied
  • iperf: write failed: Broken pipe

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    T
    @johnpoz yeah, leave it up. I made the assumption they wouldn't have two similarly named packages/apt would correct me.
  • MailReport suppress headers

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    666 Views
    No one has replied
  • LCDproc not displaying IPSEC

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    509 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    stephenw10S
    It's built into the FreeBSD package system. It would be silly for us not to carry that across.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.