Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    H
    Hello all, please dont shoot me on sight, im one of those who kinda set up things by following tutorials and actually see things how they look like on screen. And English is not my native language either. I setted up HAProxy with pfSense package for Nextcloud which works as VM at ip 192.168.1.214. It has self signed cert. I created ACME with Porkbun as wildcard and all that works totally fine. BUT i have big issue which i dont know how to solve. When im acessing by nextcloud.mydomain.xx in LOCAL LAN it serves page fine, but it uses self signed cert. Will someone, please, by example show me how to create working rule which will force pfSense to serve 192.168.1.214 and all its translation or whatever exclusively outside? Bare in mind that 214 has to be able to lurk in 192.168.1.0/24 also, since data storage is served by NFS on TrueNas. 192.168.1.1 (pfSense IP), 192.168.1.214 (Nextcloud IP) All works fine from outside, but from local LAN it bypase HAProxy, and serve nextcloud internal cert with correct domain name nextcloud.mydomain.xx . Well it seems that only bypas cert part since domain works. Somehow it resolve. This is what dig command does from local lan: ;; ANSWER SECTION: nextcloud.domain.xx. 3600 IN A 192.168.1.1 nextcloud.domain.xx. 3600 IN A 192.168.1.214 ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1) (UDP) ;; WHEN: Thu Oct 30 08:48:37 CET 2025 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 83 Main problem here is that Nextcloud app go stuck when we are on local network. It does not work since it gets different cert. It does not even ask do we want to accept it or not. Even if does it will be bit weird to do that every time we come home. Many thnx in advance!
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    B
    @Greyhat I think it's useful to work with what we've got and figure something out for the (i hope) edge cases later. So for the JSON I figured you can actually use an existing suricata integration by co-opting their pipelines.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    573 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @kabeda If memory serves, that old version of ntopng did not run as user ntopng, but as user nobody. There are lots of problems in that old version. Anyway, check the ownership and permissions of /var/db/ntopng and make sure it matches the user that ntopng runs as. You may need to set ownership of the entire hierarchy. Example: /usr/sbin/chown -R nobody:nobody /var/db/ntopng However, the better choice would be to upgrade to a more recent version.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    tinfoilmattT
    Resurrecting this thread for two reasons: 1.) Because this is where I landed when newly confronted with the topic using pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.10 on pfSense CE 2.8.1-RELEASE; and 2.) to confirm that the 'issue' and 'fix' here continue to be viable despite the TLD analysis function being considerably modified since the last post in September 2024. Current function @ L7255 of /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc: // Determine max Domain count available for DNSBL TLD analysis (Avoid Unbound memory exhaustion) $pfs_memory = (round(get_single_sysctl('hw.physmem') / (1024*1024)) ?: 1000); $pfb['pfs_mem'] = [ '0' => '100000', '1500' => '150000', '2000' => '200000', '2500' => '250000', '3000' => '400000', '4000' => '600000', '5000' => '1000000', '6000' => '1500000', '7000' => '2000000', '8000' => '2500000', '12000' => '3000000', '16000' => '4000000', '32000' => '8000000' ]; if ($pfb['dnsbl_py_blacklist']) { array_walk($pfb['pfs_mem'], function (&$value) { $value = $value * 3; }); } foreach ($pfb['pfs_mem'] as $pfb_mem => $domain_max) { if ($pfs_memory >= $pfb_mem) { $pfb['domain_max_cnt'] = $domain_max; } } On a system with 32 GB of RAM attempting to 'analyze' over 24M but less than 27M domains, the line "'32000' => '8000000'" was changed to "'32000' => '9000000'" (i.e., permitting a maximum number of 27M domains to be 'analyzed') in order for the function to complete successfully. Analyzing (and then subsequently loading) precisely this number of domains... Original Matches Removed Final ---------------------------------------- 24270656 21017552 6463516 17807140 ----------------------------------------- ...results in Unbound's stable operational consumption of ~6 GB of RAM and any/all pfBlockerNG 'Reload' options consuming as much as ~6 GB of RAM, concurrently. Therefore one should only attempt this DNSBL hack if they're confident that their system has at least 13 GB of memory 'headroom' (taking into account normal system operation and any other resource-consuming, installed packages).
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    102 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @netboy said in Docker container for nut server?: I am NOT installing docker in pfsense - offcourse this is a big security risk - I agree !!! My apologies. I interpreted your earlier question I think i need to explain what i am asking for. I am fully aware if your netgate router is attached to an UPS you can configure netgate. Let us say you 5 UPS's in your home and you want nut server to read all the UPS's and show me a dasboard about the status of all the UPS's ? - Is there a ready made docker container for client server nut with dashboard functionality? as a request to have something running on pfSense, which is why I responded I believe most people would say that the type of thing you are asking for isn't something you want to run on your firewall. I recommend using a general purpose operating system behind the firewall instead. Mutual misunderstanding I guess. If you want to explore general NUT monitoring, and not something particular to pfSense, I would recommend the NUT Users list as a better place to seek information.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    503 Topics
    3k Posts
    M
    I am using the DNS-Update method I have to use a DNS-Sleep of 5 minutes to let the letsencrypt txt dns record update propagate. During this 5 minutes the acme-webgui times out. when the acme-webgui times out the Action list is NOT executed. How can I solve this ? Would it maybe be an idea to let the acme.sh script execute the actions in the action list as a post-hook instead of the web-gui? Or maybe add an option to add post-hooks in the webUI ?
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    296 Topics
    1k Posts
    C
    This one has been tricky still not sure what to try. Any ideas?
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    92 Topics
    638 Posts
    L
    @Vad-B Interesting indeed! I just tried to fill the Pre-authentication Key with file:/dev/null. I get an crash in pfsense after some time, but when I login again is saved. For me this for after service restarts at least this solves it, including the issue with the routes not being advertised even set in the WebUI. Havent done an full restart of pfsense (yet)
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    710 Topics
    4k Posts
    N
    Found a solution: When using the desired outbound address in the outbound nat rule for translation directly, instead of using an alias ip, it seems to work as desired.
  • HA proxy with ssl

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    6k Views
    R
    @Gertjan said in HA proxy with ssl: not mail.contose.com. @Gertjan I have 2 isp and mail.contose points to those ip addresses and MX. I am using a linux mail server. I have a DV cert installed on each server. for my web server I have added the following: [image: 1750364542787-f12dc686-bf5e-4470-893e-fe8317269460-image.png] [image: 1750364586857-6940d697-2a2b-4945-b93b-535c91cf9676-image.png] and the default backend for that rule is httpswww-copy
  • Install OpenRTSP on pfSense

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    6k Views
    johnpozJ
    @heavymetalforever78 pfsense can for sure run on 1gb of ram - and other VMs could run on far less.. I have both a 2.8 vm and a 24.03 vm running on my nas, they only get 1GB each, etc. Don't try running some type 2 VM, run something like esxi or proxmox or something on the hardware.. To be honest if your goal is a NVR - get an actual NVR.. They use very little power, and are not all that expensive. I see some on amazon for like 60 bucks.. You would have to add some HDD.. but how much can a 2 or 4TB disk cost these days? Trying to use your "firewall" as your everything box is never a good idea.
  • TFTP Server WAN Interface

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • LCDProc crashes - exceeds max allowed memory size

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • 1 Votes
    9 Posts
    8k Views
    F
    Confirmed still an issue as of May 2025 with pfSense CE 2.8.0 and FreeRADIUS package version 0.15.14 I also updated the Redmine bugtracker: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11054 Can this security vulnerability please get some attention? Wi-Fi supplicants are able to join an 802.1x WPA2-Enterprise network without the username in the client certificate validated at all.
  • Zabbix proxy 7 don't start on pfsense 24.03

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • System Patches Package v2.2.20_1 / v2.2.11_17

    12
    12 Votes
    12 Posts
    9k Views
    S
    There are new system patches available (2.2.21), maybe I miss the announcement here... https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commit/8ffb307ed8845ebeeba2d00f258fd51256d0e756 Yes I do... https://forum.netgate.com/post/1214795
  • Package Notes does not exist???

    2
    1
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    6k Views
    GertjanG
    @DominikHoffmann 24.03 ? A Beta version ?
  • Zabbix Agent 7

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    7k Views
    M
    @jwilli5646 I see it is still the fact (May 2025), any update about Zabbix agent 7?
  • Pfsense Package License

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    5k Views
    S
    @MarinSNB Not sure, but I would guess you're likely to run into a problem if the Plus router is a newer FreeBSD version. The config sync could be a problem too because there are versions of the config file. https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/versions.html
  • Ignore MAC OUI in Arpwatch?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • Arpwatch - sent wrong arp op 5

    6
    2
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    5k Views
    dennypageD
    Arpwatch has no way to suppress protocol errors such as this. ANDwatch, a pending package to replace the Arpwatch package, allows suppression by way of pcap filtering.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • How do I restore my package conf files

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    5k Views
    bmeeksB
    @patient0 said in How do I restore my package conf files: ping pfsense-plus-pkg.netgate.com ping: cannot resolve pfsense-plus-pkg.netgate.com: Address family for hostname not supported Can you connect to the internet at all, like ping 1.1.1.1? From that message it does look as if DNS is not working on your system. You can't ping the package server like that directly. That hostname is actually a DNS text service record that ping does not know how to resolve. You must ask the DNS client to resolve the service record (SRV) using that hostname. The pkg utility knows how to do that, but ping does not.
  • Avahi Settings for an Epson ET-3850 Printer

    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    258 Views
    No one has replied
  • Mailreport

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    698 Views
    M
    @Danil-0 said in Mailreport: Hi. I configured SMTP (System/Advanced/Notifications) on 587 port. The test included in the pfSense configuration works, the mail is sent and received but using Email Report the mail is rejected on server side. You can find log from server below. postfix/submission/smtpd[1935]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[my ip]: 554 5.7.1 <unknown[my ip]>: Client host rejected: Access denied; from=<user1@domain.com> to=<user2@domain.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<pfsense.domain.arpa> Why then does the test mail work? What's different with the Email Report? Thanks for help. Estou com o mesmo problema. Vc conseguiu resolver?
  • Snort block notifications script (third party script)

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    8k Views
    NogBadTheBadN
    @sikita This is what I use for suricata, you may be able to tweak it a bit:- [image: 1743007897905-screenshot-2025-03-26-at-16.51.03.png] grep ^`date -v-1d "+%m/%d/%Y"` /var/log/suricata/suricata_igb0*/alerts.log | awk -v OFS='\t' -F "\[\\*\\*\]" '{a[$3]++;} END {for(i in a) print a[i],i}' | sed 's/]//g' | sed 's/\[//g' | sort -r ; echo grep ^`date -v-1d "+%m/%d/%Y"` /var/log/suricata/suricata_igb0*/alerts.log ; echo
  • Bind Update from 9.17 to 9.20

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    patient0P
    @jeffry-maynard bind 9.20 is in pfSense+ 25.03-BETA.
  • HAProxy - Include subdirectories in the HTTP Redirect

    10
    1
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    F
    @ColdBrew @viragomann @johnpoz This is an interesting discussion, and I’ve run into similar issues with HAProxy and subdirectory redirection. From what I understand, HAProxy should pass the entire path (including subdirectories) to the backend by default, as long as the backend is properly configured to handle those requests. A few things to check: Backend Configuration: Ensure the backend server (IIS in your case) is correctly set up to handle requests for the subdirectories. Sometimes, the issue might be with the backend’s routing or permissions. HAProxy Logs: Check the HAProxy logs to see if the requests are being forwarded correctly. If the logs show the requests reaching HAProxy but not the backend, it might be a routing or firewall issue. Firewall Rules: Double-check your pfSense firewall rules to ensure traffic on port 80 (or any custom port) is allowed to pass through to the backend server. If everything seems correct but it’s still timing out, you might want to test with a simpler backend (like a basic HTTP server) to rule out any IIS-specific issues. Let us know how it goes!
  • Email Reports PHP warning -> report not created

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    AMG A35A
    @patient0 Upgraded to 24.11 yesterday and had same problem your change to /usr/local/www/status_mail_report_edit.php fixed it. Thank you!!!!!!!!!
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.