Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    It was all CVE fixes in the PHP GUI part of the package. See the Redmine ticket here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16414.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    V
    @Gertjan Thanks for your reply – that’s also my impression. The point is: I don’t really see any lists right now that are actually “maintained” in the sense of being actively cleaned up, checked for dead domains, categorized, etc. That’s why my main interest is more about the demand: Would curated lists really be a game changer for admins? Would they be more helpful than what’s available today, or are most people already using other alternatives? If so, which ones? And from your perspective, what would be your expectation towards “community lists”? (e.g. reliability, update frequency, categories, fewer false positives?)
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    700 Topics
    4k Posts
    Bob.DigB
    @HFADmin If it is no Site2Site-VPN then you don't need any gateways in the first place... If that is true but you want to monitor the connection then you could create dummy-gateways just to ping the remote ip-addresses.
  • Unbound (multi domain?) problem with hosts entries from Domain Forwarder

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Hi thanks problem is fixed with last unbound update ;)
  • Haproxy-devel or haproxy-full+stud? In jail or on host pfSense 2.1?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Havp works in 2.1 but shows warning alterts

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    877 Views
    No one has replied
  • Openbgp 0.6 PROBLEM

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Squid smartphones issues with youtube?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    902 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    I have not seen development for over a year (1.2.X pfsense).  I think the developer moved to to his own site where he develops freeswitch on stand alone machines.
  • SquidGuard Group ACL not applying; incorrect client IP address

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    5k Views
    P
    @srk3461: Is your client source is set correct !? Did you set any order pref!? Is your "Target Categories" set properly! In your "Target Rules" under "Groups ACL" did you set your desired group to "white-list"? Is your "default access" at the bottom of the same is set to "allow"!? Did you hit "save" bottom after all your configuration and then hit "apply" on general page of squid-guard!? Try clearing your browser cache before checking! I knew I forgot to hit apply; it officially works.  I double checked my configurations to see what the heck was going on; I forgot to add the LAN IP address in the whitelist. Group ACL names and source IP addresses: Ben: 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.4 (pfSense, my laptop, server, and FreeNAS) Wireless Clients: 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.5 (pfSense; Wireless Router*) not connected yet The space in between the 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.5 represents a separate IP address. Thanks for the info, man. Edit: When I change my laptop's IP address from 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.5 with every setting as the same (subnet mask, gateway, DNS1, and DNS2), the group ACL doesn't go from Ben to Wireless Clients, just stays at Ben.  What else did I do wrong?  Must be pfSense 2.1-RC0-i386 has bugs in it; I'm going to install pfSense-2.0.3-AMD64
  • Soliciting Feedback on Snort Package 2.6.x Multi-Engine Config GUI Design

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    E
    @adam65535: I just tested pf with defragmentation using hping from another system and pf does normalize the traffic before sending it out.  It actually normalizes the traffic before tcpdump can even see it.  If the packets are bad enough though and pf can not or does not reassemble them then tcpdump on pfsense does see those bad fragmented packets.  It does not send them to the destination of course. I can only assume snort has an input point into the network at a lower level than tcpdump so that it can see the raw fragment packets at all times but I do not know. It seems like we should always use BSD Target Type with frag3 when the admin does not disable the pfsense 'Disable Firewall Scrub' which is the default. no the scrubbing done by pfSense firewall is not related to snort. Since tpcudmp/pcap sees packets very early, before even stack has seen them.
  • Squid proxy seems to work properly but never hits..

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    N
    I am having the same problem with i386 pfsense 2.0.3 and squid3. It appears that the proxy is working, however I only see tcp_miss. Oddly, if an image has been missed once, it is not missed again when attempting to reload.
  • {inet} > [Squid Proxy (Parent)] > [HAVP] > {clients} 403 forbidden error

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4k Views
    No one has replied
  • Squid3 spitting error

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Use pfsense as snort only box

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    9k Views
    ?
    @newbieuser1234: This sounds dumb,but how would I interact with the gui? what IP's would I assign on the WAN and opt.  Would the opt1 (the other side of the bridge) be the same IP as the router behind it? just a bit confused on the IP addressing. Thanks again for all your help with this. Sorry for taking so long to respond. Been a bit busy around here  ;D Interacting with the gui is done through the LAN interface. That's why I suggested "pfsense can easily be used as a transparent bridge, see http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,20917.0.html and adapt accordingly. Don't forget allow any>any on both interfaces, and DO NOT use the lan interface as a member of the bridge." pfsense works exactly the same (from a web gui USER's point of view) whether it's running as a bridge or a routing platform. As long as the LAN interface has a valid private ip and there is a rule allowing access to the webgui port, plugging something into the LAN will allow you to administer the box. The important thing to remember is that bridged interfaces have NO IPs, which means that you have to be careful with your rules (eg I have rules disallowing traffic not belonging to an interface's subnet from passing through the firewall, which wouldn't work with a bridge). A common use case for this is a fully transparent firewalling bridge, which allows for traffic control both ways of the bridge. The bonus is that the bridge is completely invisible on both sides of it (WAN/DMZ), unless you sift through each and every packet observing changes in the packet as it goes through the bridge (which no sane person will do). The LAN interface is used to monitor and administer the bridge, just like I said above. A random tip: do NOT try setting up a bridged CARP cluster without doing your research first. Back on track: pfsense box with snort plugin no ip assigned on WAN/OPT1 Bridge WAN/OPT1 and set up LAN interface with a valid private ip. webgui allow rule on LAN. Set up snort as mentioned above Enjoy :) EDIT: hit go button too soon. A few thoughts popped up in my head after posting: A fully transparent bridge should not be able to get on the internet. This means NO communications with the "outside world" which in turn means NO updates, NO snort rule updates (no ip assigned on the WAN, remember?  ;) ) A transparent bridge with internet is a bit different. If you have multiple static IPs, just assign one to the wan and proceed with bridging (yes even if it has an IP, yes I've tested a Frankenstein hybrid routing/bridged monster and it works perfectly, even LAN to OPT1 which according to documentation shouldn't work). If you don't have multiple static IPs a bit of default routes/nat will be needed. Basically since pfsense has no sense of other networks when used as a bridge, packets coming from itself will not know where to go or where they are coming from, and need a little "push" to get "out there"  :D
  • FreeSwitch: sccp or chan_sccp: Cisco 79xx / Cisco 525g2, experiences?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Package status meanings

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    For HAproxy, the "-devel" variety is probably more like Beta. The "-full" variety needs to go away, but some people still rely on it. Its status should really be "Deprecated" or "Retired".
  • Lightsquid 403 outstanding error!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Dansguardian - YouTube Videos with Ads not Streaming

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    5k Views
    E
    Well, as you can tell, I'm am noobie with this stuff. I've ended up adding: .c.youtube.com to the Exception Regular Expression section of the URL lists under ACL's for Dansguardian. Videos with ads on YouTube now stream. Hoping this fixes things, and I have  not ignorantly created a security risk in doing so. If anyone has any insights into this, let me know. Cheers, Paul.
  • [SOLVED] squid does not start, missing "libgssapi.so.10"

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    This proble with squid start is solved after I upgraded to pfSense 2.1-RC0 build from 20130622 (http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/i386/pfSense_RELENG_2_1/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-2.1-RC0-i386-20130622-1453.tgz).
  • SQUID + JAVA PROBLEM

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Squidguard3 fails to install and gb nics are shown 100mbits only

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    @Tikimotel: I have a dual em NIC. I've set my LAN/WAN (under the advanced button) "Speed and duplex" settings to "Default (no preference, typically autoselect)". Yep, 'Default' was what was originally selected, I tried to change only when it didn't work. I defauted back and still no go! Pressing save in the WAN/LAN menu saves some changes regarding DHCPv4 vs. DHCPv6 in the overall config of pfSense, which helps when the interface goes down and backup (If i remember correctly). So this should solve your WAN dropping and only getting back after a reboot. I have no IPV6 enabled. I changed back to 'Defualt' and saved and rebooted, yet the internet keeps on dying (but WAN interface appears to be active).
  • [SOLVED] Zabbix 2.x + pfSense 2.1RC + CPU Temperature

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    cheers for this dude.. just helped me
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.