Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    It was all CVE fixes in the PHP GUI part of the package. See the Redmine ticket here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16414.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    V
    @Gertjan Thanks for your reply – that’s also my impression. The point is: I don’t really see any lists right now that are actually “maintained” in the sense of being actively cleaned up, checked for dead domains, categorized, etc. That’s why my main interest is more about the demand: Would curated lists really be a game changer for admins? Would they be more helpful than what’s available today, or are most people already using other alternatives? If so, which ones? And from your perspective, what would be your expectation towards “community lists”? (e.g. reliability, update frequency, categories, fewer false positives?)
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    700 Topics
    4k Posts
    Bob.DigB
    @HFADmin If it is no Site2Site-VPN then you don't need any gateways in the first place... If that is true but you want to monitor the connection then you could create dummy-gateways just to ping the remote ip-addresses.
  • Zabbix2.4 agent issues

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    W
    Yes, but i trying to read ipsec status from it - and pfsense crashes. Any ideas how to make it work ?
  • MOVED: Lightsquid configuration help

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    706 Views
    No one has replied
  • Syslog-ng Basic Questions

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    W
    I have been following the progress of the syslog-ng package for pfSense as I have been wanting to provide long-term logging as well as increased flexibility over pfSense's standard logging solution.  While the package still has some issues, recent bug-fix commits have at least allowed me to get it setup on my router and it is working pretty much the way I want.  I think there's still an issue with the log-rotate and compress feature but I haven't looked into it yet to see if I can fix it myself. If you would like to experiment with syslog-ng, I would be more than willing to help you out!
  • PfBlockerNG?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    K
    Thanks again for everything I will give it try  :)
  • Firewall rules get moved arround after updates on PfBlockerNG?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    BBcan177B
    Hi  killmasta93, I took a look at your Firwall Rules screenshot… Please do not use the "pfBlockerNGSuppress" Alias as a Firewall Rule Reference… That Alias is used for suppressing those IPs when Lists are downloaded so that they don't end up blocking those IPs. Take a look at the following thread: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=86212.msg513676#msg513676
  • MOVED: Can't uninstall/reinstall/upgrade snort 2.9.7.2 pkg v3.2.4

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    472 Views
    No one has replied
  • Snort log sending to Splunk

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    4k Views
    N
    Okay , found it ! If it can help someone : The snort logs are included in the firewall logs so if you redirect your logs to a syslog server in >Status>System Logs>settings>remote server splunk will catch them. But you have to allow incoming logs from udp port 514 in splunk Now the question is .. how to correctly parse snort logs in splunk because the log format seems to have changed recently and I can't find any support on the net
  • Visual Delay Pool Monitoring in Squid?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    780 Views
    No one has replied
  • Postfix forwarder otherMailbox ldap search

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    682 Views
    No one has replied
  • 2.2.1 - mailreport: empty graphs

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    838 Views
    arrmoA
    Hi, No idea how to fix it (sorry!), but to confirm - same issue here! Seems to have broken in v2.2.2. Thanks.
  • Pfblocker not blocking?

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    BBcan177B
    @wheemer: I have PFBlockerNG enabled and I have russia, china and hong kong blocked. However my emails software is still saying it's blocking chinese IPs that are trying to brute force password hack me. I can also still browse chinese websites even though I have in and out blocked. Hi wheemer, Do you have any "Firewall Pass Rules" above the Block/Reject Rules that would allow those IPs thru? Floating Rules are processed first (top to bottom), then the Interface Firewall Rules (top to bottom) and typically on the First Rule Match thats found.
  • Stunnel won`t start after pfsense restart!

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    5k Views
    V
    I just encountered this issue today. I reinstalled the stunnel package and still was not able to launch stunnel. I ssh-ed into my pfsense box and did find / | grep stunnel the result from the above command lead me to examine /usr/local/etc/rc.d/stunnel.sh cat /usr/local/etc/rc.d/stunnel.sh which returned #!/bin/sh # This file was automatically generated # by the pfSense service handler. rc_start() {         /usr/local/bin/stunnel /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf } rc_stop() {         killall stunnel } case $1 in         start)                 rc_start                 ;;         stop)                 rc_stop                 ;;         restart)                 rc_stop                 rc_start                 ;; esac This suggested that /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf is used as the configuration file so I followed with cat /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf to examine the file, which in turn showed cert = /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem chroot = /var/tmp/stunnel setuid = stunnel setgid = stunnel Manually running the following on the command line /usr/local/bin/stunnel /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf confirmed that stunnel was exiting because there was no actual tunnel endpoints set up. So I went back to the WebGUI under Services > Stunnel, and took a look at the Tunnels tab where I had 3 tunnel endpoints configured. I figured that clicking the edit button on each entry and then clicking the save button would repopulate the /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf file so I clicked 'edit' and subsequently 'save' for each of my tunnel endpoints. As a precaution I navigated to the Certificates tab and did the same edit-save procedure for each of my three certificates. I then went back to the command line and made sure my clicking around had an effect. I ran cat /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf and was glad to see that my clicking around the GUI wasn't in vain; the file was populated with configuration parameters defining my endpoints. I then manually started stunnel from the commmand line with /usr/local/bin/stunnel /usr/local/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf and my stunnel is up and running again (also shows green on the Status > Services section). I haven't yet restarted the firewall and don't know if the solution will persist or not. Best regards, V
  • MOVED: Reverse proxy, SSL Offloading and IPS/IDS with one nic?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    513 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: SquidGuard regulate by IP address

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    430 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfBlockerNG XMLRPC Replication error

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    @foetus: And unless there has been a change since 2.2 and up, only the build in admin user works for XMLRPC sync. (other packages suffer the same limitation). Bingo. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/809
  • Postfix forwarder - relay all domains

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    GertjanG
    Have you tried to shorten the path ? Have the [ our own Web server which generates very specific emails ] deliver the mails directly to your [ our trusted SMTP relay provider ] ?
  • MOVED: Using regular expressions for blacklisting in Squidguard

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    465 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @turbogizzmo: I have a internal Exchange server on a different subnet that needs to send emails out a different gateway. Exchange is picky about the number of NICs and routing changes so I wondered if sending via a smart host would be the cleaner answer and if thats something the Postfix package can achieve? Yes, it's possible to set up the Postfix Forwarder as a smart host. After setting it up to relay outbound mail through your provider, you essentially need to tell Postfix to permit SMTP mail relay from your trusted internal host (the Exchange server). The easiest way to do that it so add your local subnet(s) (e.g. 172.16.0.0/16) or specific IP addresses (e.g. 172.16.0.1/32) to mynetworks. Here's my full solution for pfSense 2.2 from another thread. Hope that helps!
  • MOVED: Squid 3.4.10_2 https caching running pfSense 2.2.2 anyone?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    668 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: pbirun taking all the available CPU on 2.2.2

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    466 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.