Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    N

    Can I use pgblockerng aliases in Haproxy?

    80758505-9bad-4dad-a80b-c159be1045a2-image.png

    If it was a firewall rule, typing pfb would produce a dropdown to select.

    Here it has to be written, but will it work? Is it supported?

  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB

    I saw where the Netgate kernel developer updated the Suricata package in the pfSense 25.07 development branch to work with the new kernel PPPoE driver. But so far as I know that updated package has not been migrated to 2.8 CE.

    Here is the commit into the DEVEL branch: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commit/68a06b3a33c690042b61fb4ccfe96f3138e83b72.

  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    K

    @pulsartiger
    The database name is vnstat.db and its location is under /var/db/vnstat.
    With "Backup Files/Dir" we are able to do backup or also with a cron.

  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    M

    @Laxarus This worked for me as well. Though I had to search the web how to edit the file (the easiest way).

    Therefore:

    Addition for anyone struggling to find where to edit files on your pfsense system.

    Go to Diagnostics --> Edit File --> insert the location of the file:

    /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.sh

    Go to line number 1232 by filling it in the Go to line field.

    That line should read:

    s1="$(grep -cv ^${ip_placeholder2}$ ${masterfile})"

    replace only (leave the rest intact):

    masterfile

    to

    mastercat

    Then follow the above instructions from @Laxarus https://forum.netgate.com/post/1219635

  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    99 Topics
    2k Posts
    K

    @elvisimprsntr thanks for your suggestion. I will give it a try.

  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    493 Topics
    3k Posts
    johnpozJ

    @MacUsers

    https://help.zerossl.com/hc/en-us/articles/360060119933-Certificate-Revocation

    edit: oh you prob out of luck

    You can revoke any certificate issued via the ZeroSSL portal. Currently, certificates issued via ACME can not be revoked from inside the portal - please follow the instructions of your ACME client for revoking those certificates.

    the gui in pfsense does not have the ability to revoke - you prob have to move the certs to something you have certbot installed to and revoke that way.

  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    R

    I had a similar issue with Routed VTI over IPsec recently. FRR lost its neighbors after rebooting or when a tunnel went down. It never re-discovered it automatically. Only restarting FRR (either in GUI or via CLI) brought the neighbors back.

    When I manually added those under the OSPF neighbors tab in the GUI it seems to solve the problem as well.

  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    88 Topics
    572 Posts
    A

    We have a very basic configuration between three locations. All are running Netgate firewalls (1x 4100, 1x 6100 & 1x 4200). All are on the latest firmware (03.00.00.01-2Ct-uc-15) and system versions (24.11-RELEASE).

    The local subnets are as follows:
    4100 - 192.168.5.0/24
    4200 - 192.168.4.0/24
    6100 - 192.168.1.0/24

    The VPN traffic between the 4100 and 4200 is functioning 100% as expected

    The traffic between 6100 and the 4100 works going from the 4100 subnet (192.168.5.0/24) to the 6100 subnet (192.168.1.0/24)

    Traffic from the firewall (i.e. the 6100 device) to the 4100 subnet works (i.e. I can ping any device on the 192.168.5.0/24 subnet from the 6100 firewall) but I cannot ping any device on the 4100 (192.168.5.0/24) subnet from any device on the 6100 subnet (192.168.1.0/24) - other than from the firewall itself.

    All routes are correct, but it seems that traffic from the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet hits the firewall and then gets lost - traceroute shows that it goes off into the internet.

    Note too that the 6100 has IPsec VPN configured on it as well

    Suggestions would be appreciated

    Attached is a zipped pdf file with the relevant screenshots
    Relevant screen shots.zip

  • Discussions about WireGuard

    689 Topics
    4k Posts
    P

    @patient0 Thanks for further suggestions. The tunnel is definitely up and so I don't think this is a CGNAT issue after all. WAN firewall rule is in place for UDP on port 51823 (otherwise the tunnel wouldn't work, right?). I can ping from client 1 -> client 2 and visa versa and also ping all points in between like you suggest. I just can't open an HTTPS connection from pfSenseB from Client 1 using a browser. But I can do this the other way round i.e. from Client 2 to pfSenseA

    I will try and do some packet capture to see if that reveals anything.

  • LCDProc crashes - exceeds max allowed memory size

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    150 Views
    No one has replied
  • Zabbix 6.4.x required for pfsense 2.8.0-RELEASE

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    163 Views
    No one has replied
  • 1 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    F

    Confirmed still an issue as of May 2025 with pfSense CE 2.8.0 and FreeRADIUS package version 0.15.14

    I also updated the Redmine bugtracker: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11054

    Can this security vulnerability please get some attention? Wi-Fi supplicants are able to join an 802.1x WPA2-Enterprise network without the username in the client certificate validated at all.

  • Zabbix proxy 7 don't start on pfsense 24.03

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    153 Views
    No one has replied
  • Package Notes does not exist???

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    268 Views
    GertjanG

    @DominikHoffmann

    24.03 ? A Beta version ?

  • Zabbix Agent 7

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    @jwilli5646

    I see it is still the fact (May 2025), any update about Zabbix agent 7?

  • Pfsense Package License

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    627 Views
    S

    @MarinSNB Not sure, but I would guess you're likely to run into a problem if the Plus router is a newer FreeBSD version. The config sync could be a problem too because there are versions of the config file.

    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/versions.html

  • Ignore MAC OUI in Arpwatch?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    197 Views
    No one has replied
  • Arpwatch - sent wrong arp op 5

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    559 Views
    dennypageD

    Arpwatch has no way to suppress protocol errors such as this. ANDwatch, a pending package to replace the Arpwatch package, allows suppression by way of pcap filtering.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • How do I restore my package conf files

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    554 Views
    bmeeksB

    @patient0 said in How do I restore my package conf files:

    ping pfsense-plus-pkg.netgate.com
    ping: cannot resolve pfsense-plus-pkg.netgate.com: Address family for hostname not supported
    Can you connect to the internet at all, like ping 1.1.1.1? From that message it does look as if DNS is not working on your system.

    You can't ping the package server like that directly. That hostname is actually a DNS text service record that ping does not know how to resolve. You must ask the DNS client to resolve the service record (SRV) using that hostname. The pkg utility knows how to do that, but ping does not.

  • Avahi Settings for an Epson ET-3850 Printer

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    179 Views
    No one has replied
  • Mailreport

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    584 Views
    M

    @Danil-0 said in Mailreport:

    Hi.
    I configured SMTP (System/Advanced/Notifications) on 587 port. The test included in the pfSense configuration works, the mail is sent and received but using Email Report the mail is rejected on server side. You can find log from server below.

    postfix/submission/smtpd[1935]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[my ip]: 554 5.7.1 <unknown[my ip]>: Client host rejected: Access denied; from=<user1@domain.com> to=<user2@domain.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<pfsense.domain.arpa>

    Why then does the test mail work? What's different with the Email Report?

    Thanks for help.

    Estou com o mesmo problema. Vc conseguiu resolver?

  • Snort block notifications script (third party script)

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    5k Views
    NogBadTheBadN

    @sikita

    This is what I use for suricata, you may be able to tweak it a bit:-

    Screenshot 2025-03-26 at 16.51.03.png

    grep ^`date -v-1d "+%m/%d/%Y"` /var/log/suricata/suricata_igb0*/alerts.log | awk -v OFS='\t' -F "\[\\*\\*\]" '{a[$3]++;} END {for(i in a) print a[i],i}' | sed 's/]//g' | sed 's/\[//g' | sort -r ; echo grep ^`date -v-1d "+%m/%d/%Y"` /var/log/suricata/suricata_igb0*/alerts.log ; echo
  • Bind Update from 9.17 to 9.20

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    414 Views
    patient0P

    @jeffry-maynard bind 9.20 is in pfSense+ 25.03-BETA.

  • HAProxy - Include subdirectories in the HTTP Redirect

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    948 Views
    F

    @ColdBrew @viragomann @johnpoz

    This is an interesting discussion, and I’ve run into similar issues with HAProxy and subdirectory redirection. From what I understand, HAProxy should pass the entire path (including subdirectories) to the backend by default, as long as the backend is properly configured to handle those requests.

    A few things to check:

    Backend Configuration: Ensure the backend server (IIS in your case) is correctly set up to handle requests for the subdirectories. Sometimes, the issue might be with the backend’s routing or permissions. HAProxy Logs: Check the HAProxy logs to see if the requests are being forwarded correctly. If the logs show the requests reaching HAProxy but not the backend, it might be a routing or firewall issue. Firewall Rules: Double-check your pfSense firewall rules to ensure traffic on port 80 (or any custom port) is allowed to pass through to the backend server.

    If everything seems correct but it’s still timing out, you might want to test with a simpler backend (like a basic HTTP server) to rule out any IIS-specific issues.

    Let us know how it goes!

  • Email Reports PHP warning -> report not created

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    836 Views
    AMG A35A

    @patient0 Upgraded to 24.11 yesterday and had same problem your change to /usr/local/www/status_mail_report_edit.php fixed it. Thank you!!!!!!!!!

  • Is anyone working on a RustDesk package?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    464 Views
    M

    @JSmorada I'm not using rustdesk, but there is a docker option if you don't want to spin up a VM..

    https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/self-host/rustdesk-server-oss/docker/#install-your-own-server-with-docker

  • Crowdsec finally comming to pfSense

    68
    2 Votes
    68 Posts
    17k Views
    Sergei_ShablovskyS

    @provels said in Crowdsec finally comming to pfSense:

    Have there been any more thoughts about including Crowdsec as an official pfSsense package?

    Upvoting this!

  • BIND Package and RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    204 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.