I can't believe it was release on github. Was the no cvs server available to use?

Yes, I would love that to. Especially how to use max upload/download bandwith limits per user.

Did you find a working solutions?

Overall, Chrony is actually quite nice. Shame about the license.

@Harvy66:

Just a quick fix, just enabled Codel shaping on your WAN and LAN interfaces and set your bandwidth to 90% of your actual bandwidth.

+1

Hey john, you make me laugh :)

I have been there this weekend and what I could find was not the best :/
situation:

WAN -> WAN

OPT1 -> (direct line)PoE switch -> several ProCurve M5M310 AP and Linksys (was installed years ago by a company) (IP 192.168.2.xxx)

LAN -> simple (dumb) switch, from here it goes 4 ways: (IP 192.168.0.xxx)

1: phone box (currently disabled)
2: to reception -> dumb switch -> computers, printers.
3: to office -> dumb switch -> printers, computers
4: camera

the ISP is even more horrible then i thought, they got a DSL line that has a maximum of 28Mbps and if we are lucky we get 6Mbps at night.
I have told them to change this ASAP this month, and going to change this to a 125Mbps line to start with.

I myself prefer meritocratic forums. Not a huge fan of democratic, everyone's opinion matters, everyone gets a trophy forums. But I do frequent support forums where the target audience are the general public and need help.

Hi, i like your captive portal design, I am setting up one for elementary school I was wondering if you are will to share the code.

thank you!

This forum is for General Discussion.  if you need technical support, try the Support forums, specifically the Cache/Proxy forum.

Don't rule out that the gateway itself just doesn't like responding to pings. While highly correlated, some hardware accelerated devices can forward packets fine, but actually responding to pings requires the severely limited host CPU to do work.

You could always look for 2Gb fiber from Comcast, but for $300/mo.

;)

Pretty much answered here

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=117943.msg653538#msg653538

FreeBSD 11 is making things crazy

So you answered this thread a year later??  Kind of pointless…

am wondering of there is any one trying to help otherwise am still waiting

Perhaps you should post your problems in the pfSense English Support section, and not General Discussion.

By default you will get automatic NAT rules for traffic from each internal LAN as it goes out WAN.
You can change to manual NAT if you like, and then put whatever NAT rules you like (or no NAT rules).
Since server2, server3, server4 have IPs in private address space, then I assume they only talk within your intranet (because without NAT assistance they cannot talk to public IPs). If that is so, then you probably should put block rules on lan1, lan2, lan3 to stop any packets with source server1,server2,server3 and destination public IP. If you don't do that, then the servers can still try to access public IPs, the traffic will not be NAT'd and packets with private source IPs will head out WAN. The internet routers will drop them, but it seems a waste to even send them in the first place.

BBCan177,

confused only two easy list from DNBS EasyList inbuilt?

7.png_thumb
7.png