Subcategories

  • Discussions and feedback related to this forum

    610 Topics
    3k Posts
    G
    @stephenw10 This is my final note since it seem you will always look at this as an endpoint. It doesn't appear, it actually is, the facts are the facts. Still, moderator usually have a way to remove posts and ban single users, not just the entire herd, or at least the ones use. Perhaps those are more advance, or perhaps netgate forums lack that functionality. I never said negate took this issue lightly, I was just looking for some feedback. I have seen this process many times and for the looks of it, pfsense CE is very much in maintenance mode. Just because netgate wants to be politically correct does not mean it is not. The fact are there and they are fallowing the same path as others did. Again, this subject is just becoming redundant and it is affecting other users in the forum.
  • Community Hiring and For Hire postings related to jobs that require pfSense software skills

    29 Topics
    117 Posts
    w0wW
    @sef1414 Name it "run.sh", copy to pf and chmod according documentation https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/development/boot-commands.html#shell-script-option You will see messages in the system log like those quoted in the script after logger command.
  • Super Stoked for 2.3

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    JailerJ
    I remember seeing that (dropping 32bit) but I couldn't remember if it was for 2.3 or 3.0. At any rate I love pfsense, just trying to judge when I'm going to be forced to upgrade my old hardware even though I think it's kinda cool that 14 year old hardware can still have a purpose.
  • Ask SlashDot: How To Deal With a Persistent and Incessant Port Scanner?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    N
    I was a Slashdotter until I found Hackers News. Within the first few days of browsing I saw people like Moxie Marlinspike saying intelligent things in the comments and I was hooked. Very often, the article's author or the person whom the article is written about will be in the comments. Sure… there are still comments that are pants-crapping insane, but that's life. :) Slashdot is dead.
  • PfSense V.S. VyOS

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    26k Views
    J
    @Harvy66: FreeBSD 11, summer next year, will have a slew of huge improvements for nearly everything related to VMs and network performance. Then it's a matter of waiting for PFSense to get rebased. You seemingly have no idea how trivial it is to 'rebase' now. What was true in the past is no longer true with the changes we've made to the build system for 2.3 and beyond. In other words: We fixed that shit. Point-in-fact, 2.3 follows -STABLE.  When it is released, we will be so far along the path to 10.3 that the eventual upgrade will be a non-event (and likely carried out entirely via "pkg update;pkg upgrade", or the GUI equivalent.) We have an internal project that follows -CURRENT (FreeBSD will be the eventual -RELEASE of what is now -CURRENT), so that will also be trivial. Mostly, it will come down to testing.
  • Attack via port 33434 ???

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    B
    Ok, will do.  Is there any reason why they are using multiple sources for trace route? (Wouldn't it suffice for just one machine to send the packet rather than 50 or 100?)
  • Thankyou!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    941 Views
    D
    Glad you were able to get yourself up and running. If you hunt around the forums you'll find a vast amount of accumulated knowledge and tips.  Some take more work than others to find, but well worth the effort IMHO. Welcome to pfSense  :)
  • MOVED: New To Port Forwarding

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    688 Views
    No one has replied
  • MOVED: New To VPN

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    608 Views
    No one has replied
  • DHCP server

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    @Phishfry: I was thinking more along the lines that you would not include a web server because there are so many different web servers, but that there is only one main dhcp server used by both Linux and BSD's. The ICS one with many versions in use. I do notice that debian ships without a dhcp server included as well. No big deal at all I was just wondering if there was a back story. This might have to do with the pupose of the server. dhcp is used mostly by internal networks - such as bootp, nfs, samba, etc.. maybe one reason, a good one by my account. Then these days, dhcp is nearly certain on internet routers by ISPs. So, two dhcp servers on the same network is trouble so is the fact that dhcp is tied into so many bootp, dns, and other servers/services So - dhcp is NOT internet friendly, NOT isolated to a few calls such as a database server, and really a joy-kill comes to improper config - NO NETWORK! Limited but essential, No, I have no idea why FreeDSB does not ship with dhcp Debian ships with NO UNECESSARY servers - like ??? Wow! Go Debian!
  • Good read on Asterick

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    728 Views
    No one has replied
  • Build PFsense HA on VMWare without promiscuous mode

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    that would require that we move away from CARP. I don't discuss future plans here.  (try reddit… lol)
  • GonzoPancho we miss you…

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    Le gonzopancho est mort, vive le gonzopancho !
  • Can any one help me

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    773 Views
    D
    Check out: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=56941.0
  • ReCon Meddle Project

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    978 Views
    No one has replied
  • Wireshark 2.0.0 Released

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    605 Views
    No one has replied
  • Taking it to the Next level

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    _
    figured it out.. set a static ip on the lan with the gateway the same as the LAN interface and connect wifi to existing network…
  • Configuring access the WebGui interface using Active Directory user?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    778 Views
    D
    Wrong section but here's how you configure the AD authentication for pfSense. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=44689.0 Pictorial guide:  http://www.geeklk.com/2014/03/pfsense-configuring-windows-active-directory-authentication/ You'll need to assign the correct groups and rights as you require.
  • Realtime bandwidth monitoring with Nagios

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • The reason why I run pfsense and multiple security software

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    822 Views
    No one has replied
  • Some website cannot access

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    I would suggest that your first troubleshooting step is to disable squid and squidguard, then clear out any tables those package have created. You can then verify that the desired traffic is passing through the firewall, which verifies your firewall rules allow it to pass. Once you have things working without squid and squidguard, you will need to reintroduce those packages and debug your settings. If you have a squid or squidguard problem that you cannot solve, I suggest you post again in the Cache/Proxy forum.
  • Cool read on new p-states with Intel's Skylake

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.