Subcategories

  • Discussions and feedback related to this forum

    610 Topics
    3k Posts
    G
    @stephenw10 This is my final note since it seem you will always look at this as an endpoint. It doesn't appear, it actually is, the facts are the facts. Still, moderator usually have a way to remove posts and ban single users, not just the entire herd, or at least the ones use. Perhaps those are more advance, or perhaps netgate forums lack that functionality. I never said negate took this issue lightly, I was just looking for some feedback. I have seen this process many times and for the looks of it, pfsense CE is very much in maintenance mode. Just because netgate wants to be politically correct does not mean it is not. The fact are there and they are fallowing the same path as others did. Again, this subject is just becoming redundant and it is affecting other users in the forum.
  • Community Hiring and For Hire postings related to jobs that require pfSense software skills

    29 Topics
    117 Posts
    w0wW
    @sef1414 Name it "run.sh", copy to pf and chmod according documentation https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/development/boot-commands.html#shell-script-option You will see messages in the system log like those quoted in the script after logger command.
  • Pfblocker is my hero :)

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    @bbcan @overlordsofthewiki perhaps this could/should be updated? https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Pfblocker also might be nice to provide a sortof up-to-date list of working free/paid blocklists that work with pfblng.
  • Stupid ![](tag)

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ
    One detail that could be important: Users browsing the forum that are not logged in cannot see attachments, so using inline images can be better for some cases. You just drop the URL to an image hosted elsewhere inside the tag, like so: [img]http://i.imgur.com/0LlOg66.png[/img]
  • IPv6, NTP and SHODAN

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    I suppose, but I'd rather head off anyone eager to tout that as a security measure in this day and age, too many people already thought NAT was a security measure in IPv4. Sure it might have helped or been part of a larger strategy, but it's not something that should be relied upon. If devices use privacy addressing or hop addresses the collected data will only be useful during a small window anyhow.
  • PfSense 2.0 Suspicious IP Connections

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    @cmb: Connecting to them with what protocol/port? With that description, guessing UDP 123, NTP time sync traffic to pool.ntp.org members. Thanks, I haven’t checked which protocol/port. I will try that, but first I changed the NTP server to see if the problem stops.
  • EMD diesel engines

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    jahonixJ
    I don't want to re-fuel this thread, just like to say "Thanks!" to cmb/Chris for his statement. Of course my reply was meant in a funny way - I was laughing when I wrote it. Just imagine a smiley at the end of the line and it gets clear. Otherwise I would have ignored the post and gone away silently. @cmb: though slightly out of line Maybe because English is not my mother tongue.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    966 Views
    C
    Upgrade to 2.2.6, that was fixed at some point since then if it's what I think it is.
  • Pulling Out of the Forum

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    K
    Hmmmmmm….  Yeah.  Sucks he left.
  • Good Review

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    jdillardJ
    Ah. Here are a couple from Serve The Home: http://www.servethehome.com/tag/netgate/ There are also customer reviews on the pfSense and Netgate store product pages. We have a Netgate.com site in development, expect more in that space. edit: add line about customer reviews
  • OpenSSH client roaming key disclosure bug CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    KOMK
    Have look who provided this quality code Not Scott Adams?
  • Free Beer Tommorrow

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    ?
    Not looking too good for Free Beer with winners in California, Tennessee and Florida…
  • Et tu, Fortinet?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    930 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfSense IS awsome

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    jdillardJ
    I started it here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105184.0
  • Pfsense on Lenovo RD650 Server

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    865 Views
    No one has replied
  • VPN attacks

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    DerelictD
    Any thoughts on what the "two leading" encryption chips are?
  • Verizon-routing-millions-of-ips-for-cybercrime-gangs

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    826 Views
    No one has replied
  • Automate Bootup After UPS Shutdown

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    @maverick_slo: Actually it will. I have it setup like this. Power has to be off at least 25 seconds so that green led on mobo dies. Then it will power on. If led dont die out it will not power on… Well that makes it easy, after I get the UPS setup and installed I will have to check this out.
  • CAT 6A not worth it …

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    5k Views
    ?
    @fantasypoo: I recently purchased a used 10/100 Cisco catalyst switch and figured it was time to upgrade to cat 6a from my old cat 5e cables. I decided to make my own cables and bought a spool of this superior essex 6A CMP cable. This upgrade made no difference at all and these cables aren't flexible at all!!! What were you expecting to happen?
  • Proxy Server on pfSense vs dedicated on VMWare

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    857 Views
    C
    I would: 1 - post this question in the "package / proxy" dedicated section  ;) 2 - go for standalone deployment. Reason for point 1 is that you will get much more feedback. Regarding point 2: this "package" approach is quite strange: although this is supported by pfSense and somewhat integrated in pfSense menu, packages are developed and maintained "outside". Risk of having misalignment in term of version is significantly higher and you will get better flexibility with your own deployment.
  • Calling all users!!

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    N
    @Derelict: @Nullity: @Harvy66: Unfortunately, I have not done this ever/yet. Now that my wife and I are no longer having to eat ramen, we're going to discuss this topic. FreeBSD and OpenBSD. Two good investments. just finished a bowel of ramen & tuna (and hot sauce) myself. Not complaining though. :D A bowel of ramen huh. Sounds nasty. lol Shutup… :)
  • Ian Murdock, father of Debian, dead at 42

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    620 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.