Some pictures maybe help!

Why Gateway = link#3, I just have 1 WAN interface.

Thanks


Don't confuse your self - If you browse to http://www.whatismyip.com/ and hit F5 (refresh) you should see your IP change each time. This is because each time you hit F5 a new session is created and fired out the next available modem on port 80 in a Round_Robin fashion.

People uploading from you, say on a website you host will still be coming in via just one modem and will still be limited to that modems upload capability.

In order for you to make full use of both wan links you will need to use something that makes use of multiple session that can be fired out each modem e.g. peer to peer software like emule or uTorrent.

I tend to keep the traffic separate and send priority traffic out one interface and bulk out another this is the simplest form of traffic shaping. You could implement full traffic shaping but it is quite complicated to get right and can make it worse if you get it wrong - you might want to wait till 2 come out of Alpha before you try it.

What you have set up will make use of both WAN links.

Can you draw a diagram?
Are you allowing UDP 520?
Did you enable RIP on the border routers?

If you want to delete a lot of rules you could edit config.xml
Under diagnostics you'll find backup/restore (download -> edit -> upload) or edit file (load /conf/config.xml)

As a side note http://you_pfsense_ip/status.php for bird picture.

@simpi:

my setup pfsense attached with 2 wan and 2 lan internet is working fine on both the lans but i am not able route the traffic between both the lan
pf –--pfsense
ps---proxyserver on winxp and i have enable ipenablerouter in winxp

From your diagram, if you say you can't seem to pass traffic back and forth from lan1 to lan2, then your problem is in PS (proxyserver). It seems to me that your ps has 2 nic, 1 is facing Lan1 and 1 is on Lan2, thus that ps has to be able to route the traffic in that passed through it.

What kind of server is it? Linux/*BSD/Windows ?

I don't have anything to add to the topic, but I thought the topic was amusing. I read it as thinking you needed a way for a 'State authority' to inspect the traffic pfsense routes. Amusing to find you were talking about connection state ;)

You are right. It doesn't work for ssh either. Its probably because of pf that the routing rules are ignored.

It does work on the LAN side.

I added the DNS rule for my seed lan; no change.
http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss215/occaliforniabt/dns1.jpg

Perhaps a better question is:

How should I setup a 2nd LAN on a new interface (w. DHCP)? Then, I can let it use the Dual Wans.

outbound: yes
inbound: yes

Thanks :)
Me to was wondering about LAN Adress VS LAN subnet

1: Create a balancing pool and add a dummy-entry.
2: Download the config.xml and find the part with the info you add.
3: Copy/Paste your dummy entry and fill in the real gateway/monitor IPs.

As monitoring IP use one of the immediate hops on your ISP's side.
You cannot have the same monitoring IP for different WANs.

4: Restore the config.xml.

Now your manually added infos should show up.

It looks like you're allow rule for the LAN on the border router is only allowing traffic originating from that subnet. With a routed network not performing NAT, it will see traffic coming from  those inside addresses (10.106 10.105).

You might just put a full allow rule on the WAN interfaces of the internal routers until everything is working and then tighten it down afterwards. That will make sure that RIP works and then you wont have to use static routes.

yeah it was a form of troubleshooting trying to see if it was going out on a different ip :)

Search: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?action=search

–> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7001.0.html
--> --> http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tutorials
--> --> --> http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/MultiWanVersion1.2

Hi,
thankyou very much for your help.
Now it works!!!
Emanuele