• Make Port forward work from LAN -> WAN -> LAN

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    OK, I found my problem.. I have pout any instead of Interface address on the NAT rule :-) It works now.. Thanks /MartOn @marton: @hoba: Turn on NAT-Reflection at system>advanced (very bottom of this page). I tried this, but then all my web requests are beeing redirected to my internal server. It seems even www.pfsense.com will be redirected to my internal web server.. Any Idea why this happens? /MartOn
  • Port forwarding

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    4k Views
    C
    celtic, see: http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=PortForwardTroubleShooting
  • NAT reflection disconnects after 20s idle

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    W
    Now I found the right thread: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1528.0.html - don't know why I didnt find it earliear when i was trying to solve the problem myself :( sorry for the trouble. Thanks Arno
  • 1-1NAT, newbie questions

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    A
    I have similar problem. I can't do NAT on WAN2. On WAN it worked all the time but for WAN wan't  :( If I set it I allways have WAN IP. I do VIP's as Proxy ARP, CARP but it never worked. I try to set WAN2 ip as default route for few machines on LAN. Can somebody knows how to set this?
  • Simple nat not working

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    I'm not using bridge, until now I just named the interface..
  • Double Nat How bad ?

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    5k Views
    C
    The main issue with NAT'ing twice is protocols that are NAT-unfriendly. That includes some VPN client software, some VoIP protocols, FTP, amongst others. These protocols are a pain to deal with when doing NAT once, adding a second NAT into the mix makes it twice as difficult to make these things work right and troubleshoot when things aren't working. It should be avoided if possible, because it's usually adding a layer of complexity that's unnecessary. In your case, I would see if you could use the modem as strictly a bridge and put the static IP on pfsense. It doesn't affect packet size because NAT changes the source IP and possibly port (depending on the NAT implementation) on packets, it doesn't add anything to them.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    udp reflection should work, the problem seems to be when using a single rule with "tcp/udp". We need to check this.
  • FTP… again... 1 more...

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=FTPTroubleShooting
  • Special NAT-question

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    C
    @hex2bin: did you plug in WAN and LAN into the same physical network? Jepp, the firewall just acts as a webfilter, so it is no security problem. But it is a networking problem - your firewall can't have two interfaces on the same subnet, and it's never good to have both on the same broadcast domain. What do you mean by web filter? What are you wanting to accomplish?
  • Can't port forward

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    Yes.  Basically how IP works.
  • 1:1 NAT on Modem causes Port Forwarding Problems

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    N
    I musta been delirious from being out in the sun all muddied up yesterday or something because I just now tried this at our office and it's working fine.  I didn't change my setup  ??? Oh well, it works so I'm not gonna complain.  :P
  • Cannot pass through UDP port 5060

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    Good to hear  :D
  • Oracle Listener through pfsense nat port forward

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    6k Views
    J
    the error with  oracle listener nat, by default port 1521, was that i push the rules at the end, so, change , and push the firewall rules at top of list, and found OK. pd: sory by my english boys.
  • Nat of multiple ports

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    sorry guys for asking that silly question I didn't really think through what I was doing. It is all sorted. Memory block  ???
  • FTP again :/

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    J
    sullrich, yeaaaa, thanks sr. just in the target *
  • Time sync on all PCs

    Locked
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    more status on this issue as of today it is no longer working and this is with the other rule in place. Here are the logs Apr 23 18:04:39 pf: 10. 726712 rule 38/0(match): pass in on xl0: 192.X.X.X.123 > 207.46.130.100.123: NTPv3, symmetric active, length 48 Apr 23 18:00:32 pf: 156. 377540 rule 38/0(match): pass in on xl0: 192.X.X.123 > 192.43.244.18.123: NTPv3, symmetric active, length 48 Apr 23 17:57:56 pf: 23. 546766 rule 38/0(match): pass in on xl0: 192.X.X.X.123 > 192.43.244.18.123: NTPv3, symmetric active, length 48 Apr 23 17:57:32 pf: 86. 472199 rule 38/0(match): pass in on xl0: 192.X.X.X.123 > 207.46.130.100.123: NTPv3, symmetric active, length 48 Windows reporting time period exspired Here are the rules UDP  *  *  *  123 (NTP)  *  NTP Rule LAN net  *  *  *  *  Default LAN -> any Update Removed the first rule and it looks to have returned again. I think I may have found something not 100% sure but it does fail on the first appemt but does complete on the second third and forth attempt.
  • Port forward to another subnet

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    B
    Ok… Disregard. I figured it out. The problem had was a bad route.
  • Router on a Stick: 1WAN, 3LANs and NAT

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    W
    Yep!  Thats it!  I didn't realize (and i should have, im an idiot) that their is the implicit deny all.  A simple permit all allowed traffic to flow. Thanks for helping a n00b out!
  • MOVED: NAT + Shaping - How to?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Aliases on NAT Rules

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    Aliases work for every input field with red background.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.