• 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    234 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    353 Views
    No one has replied
  • No ALTQ support for Intel i226v?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    The best values for those are the defaults. Hardware Checksum Offloading = Unchecked TSO = Checked LRO = Checked You do not want TSO or LRO active on a firewall/router.
  • transparent openVPN (tap) with traffic shaping of voip?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    568 Views
    J
    @johngoutbeck So NO answer. Does this mean traffic shaping cannot be done for a transparent tunnel?
  • fios 1gb bufferbloat

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    352 Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic Shaper - Limiter Got Bug

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    478 Views
    No one has replied
  • Configuring limiters immediately black holes WAN traffic?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    420 Views
    No one has replied
  • Inbound load balancing

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    790 Views
    jimpJ
    Without a proxy there is no concept of ensuring a client gets directed to the same backend for subsequent requests, and no way to handle removing a down/unresponsive server from the pool of available targets.
  • Wireguard FQ_CODEL + ALTQ (PRIOQ)

    fqcodel altq
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    553 Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic Shaping in 23.01 - Bug?

    20
    1 Votes
    20 Posts
    4k Views
    D
    @steveits And it is fixed! Whew. Now if I can just get the box to check for updates reliably, which is yet another new issue, albeit a minor one!
  • Question - fq_codel_enqueue over limit ?

    7
    1
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    RobbieTTR
    @magikmark Thanks very much for the tailored advice. The fq_codel error logs are pulled from /var/log/system.log so they also show in the GUI under Status/System Logs/System/General. For whatever reason the errors promptly ceased after an unrelated update & reboot, so I have not had a chance to apply and monitor the suggested values. The 'observer effect' no doubt. ️
  • Error when trying to setup traffic shaping

    traffic shaping wizard php error
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    TheCableGuy96T
    @steveits Ahh thank you, I did Google quite a bit but didn't find that. I hope there's a solution soon.
  • I need the opposite of a Limiter? Guarenteed min BW on each VLAN

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    902 Views
    S
    @rb625 traffic shaper can do this https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/trafficshaper/altq-scheduler-types.html#hierarchical-fair-service-curve-hfsc I’ve not used HFSC but there are tutorials online. CBQ has limits and “borrowing” but I had some challenges getting it to work. IIRC one has to set borrowing on the parent queue as well.
  • Limiters only applies for in-pipe and not for out-pipe

    1
    3
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    310 Views
    No one has replied
  • 23.01 - Traffic shaper not working as expected

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    262 Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffice Shaping / Limiters do not work on 22.05 after upgrade

    19
    3 Votes
    19 Posts
    5k Views
    A
    @level4 Thankyou, it worked
  • bufferbloat with fq_codel after update to 23.01

    22
    3
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    4k Views
    T
    @jeremyj-0 Unfortunately for me, setting it to CoDel didn't help at all. I think we and many others have different environments, so it is hard to compare. I think I need to learn how to profile both system and network first. Because before I can solve it, I have to find out if it is something with software, hardware, or maybe my ISP is breaking everything. But each part needs different tools to investigate it properly. Also, I'm making it even harder by using proxmox.
  • CoDel Pass Rule floating to the top?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @nocling yep - I'm using the same rule order. I think the "Pass" option for CoDel (in the documentation) meant that it gets re-ordered to the top of the list when it should be the last thing. I've put it at the end of my list of traffic shaping "match" rules and bufferbloat tests seem consistent in behaviour to the "pass" rule at the end of all floating rules.
  • Floating Rule Action: Pass or Match

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    735 Views
    S
    @christos3105 That would be my understanding, but, if it is WAN Out that would normally always be allowed anyway (since normal rules are processed when packets enter an interface).
  • WAN & VPN Traffic Shaper: VPN speed limited to half of limiter

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    514 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.