Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. traffic shaping
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • A

      15mb limiter queue with mask 32 in 2000 customer
      Traffic Shaping • traffic shaping • • arham

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      229
      Views

      No one has replied

    • I

      Traffic not matching floating rule
      Firewalling • traffic shaping • • ibbetsion

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      151
      Views

      I

      @steveits said in Traffic not matching floating rule:

      Check Status/Queues to make sure the traffic isn't actually in the queue and the state counter just isn't counting up.

      Check Diagnostics/States and see if the state is matching your source. For instance in order to lower priority on a download the state may be to the webserver:443 and the return traffic matches the state but not the rule. (so, doesn't seem to count up the counter...)

      Is low_priority_src a LAN IP behind NAT? If so it can't match, see https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/trafficshaper/advanced.html#shaper-rule-matching-tips for info on tagging it.

      Brilliant, thanks so much for the hint/info on tagging!

    • I

      Ghost traffic shaping queues??
      General pfSense Questions • limiters traffic shaping queues • • ibbetsion

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      160
      Views

      A

      @ibbetsion

      You must have something stuck in there somewhere. I just looked on a spare pfsense box I've got, with no traffic shaping setup at all, and this is the result I see in Diagnostics->Limiter Info

      Limiters: No limiters were found on this system.
    • R

      Rocket League Ping Spikes and packet loss
      Traffic Shaping • gaming traffic shaping codel ping ping spikes • • RGK1

      40
      0
      Votes
      40
      Posts
      2282
      Views

      R

      If you are not using limiters, then note this from the guide;

      The ALTQ framework is handled through pf and is closely tied to network card drivers. ALTQ can handle several types of schedulers and queue layouts. The traffic shaper wizard configures ALTQ and gives firewall administrators the ability to quickly configure QoS for common scenarios, and it allows custom rules for more complex tasks. ALTQ is inefficient, however, so the maximum potential throughput of a firewall is lowered significantly when it is active.

      pfSense software also supports a separate shaper concept called Limiters. Limiters enforce hard bandwidth limits for a group or on a per-IP address or network basis. Inside of those bandwidth limits, limiters can also manage traffic priorities.

    • I

      No ALTQ-Capable interfaces?
      Traffic Shaping • altq traffic shaping • • inDane

      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      278
      Views

      jimp

      ue0 (USB Ethernet) does not support ALTQ.

    • R

      Simulating Delay and packet drop
      Traffic Shaping • traffic shaping limiters • • Rupesh

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      122
      Views

      No one has replied

    • E

      FQ_CoDel and OpenVPN
      Traffic Shaping • traffic shaping fqcodel openvpn • • e7msjc4uljwy

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      231
      Views

      No one has replied

    • C

      WAN Packetloss when Traffic Shaping is activated
      Traffic Shaping • traffic shaping packet loss • • carroarmato0

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      152
      Views

      No one has replied

    • S

      All traffic halts when enabling CoDel
      Traffic Shaping • codel traffic shaping • • shad0wca7

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      179
      Views

      No one has replied

    • K

      Hangout priority
      Traffic Shaping • voip traffic shaping multi-wan multiple-lan • • kcallis

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      310
      Views

      No one has replied