Subcategories

  • Discussions about development snapshots for pfSense Plus 25.03

    52 Topics
    754 Posts
    S

    @chpalmer
    yeah I'm fairly sure this confusion is the source of the rather quick bug closure.

    It isn't about the temperatures themselves.
    It isn't about the sensors themselves.
    It is about the graph function listed in bug 16302.

    There is a graph function with a handful of dropdown options. It defaults to CPU; and you can pick right now, a week, a month, whatever of data. A year of cpu is whatever it is, but the dates are correct at the bottom of the graph. Flip it to thermal sensors, and the graphs have a pretty whack time range despite having the exact same 1 year or 6 month setting or whatever.

    To your query; mine is sitting ambient room temperature between 65-74F (18-23C and the thermals on the firewall itself usually report between 91-95F (32-35C).
    Again...it isn't the sensors...it is the specific graph function.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    10 Views
    No one has replied
  • export p12 pfsense crash report

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    196 Views
    No one has replied
  • pf 2.4.5 need add ecdsa Certificates support

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    306 Views
    jimpJ

    No. It's in 2.5.0, but won't be copied back to 2.4.5. It's too late and the changes required for that are too large. (And IIRC it may also require PHP 7.3 and OpenSSL 1.1.1 for some parts, but I might be misremembering that).

  • Is this a real update or a fake update

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    896 Views
    jimpJ

    We're working on migrating the builds over to a new coordinated system that is not only faster but will have consistent timestamps for everything across all builds that start at the same time. It will trigger at set times, multiple times per day, rather than on demand as commits happen, but can still be set off manually if we want.

    Other than the timestamps being more "even" in most cases, it should be transparent to users.

    The timestamp on the individual images will be when the entire build run starts and not necessarily when that kernel build timestamp happens.

  • PHP warning

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    419 Views
    jimpJ

    I think we found/fixed most of those unquoted strings some time ago, but there is always a possibility that more are lurking.

    The <shaper> section wouldn't show what the wizard had in it that led to the original error, but if you look in <ezshaper> that holds the wizard data.

  • I have the issue with the squid

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    529 Views
    S

    I'm not trying to be disrespectful friend, just you didn't mention whether it was running or functional afterward, nor an actual complete error line so hard to start troubleshooting. :)

    Finding out if it starts properly from the webconfigurator after full up compared to at startup can potentially be a valid troubleshooting step that would lead to the cause.

    edit:
    Just built fresh 2.4.4_release-p3 vm and installed full squid package. As far as I can tell, every single edit to the squid configs generates a similar line in the logs. Restarting the machine also puts one in the log every single time. Tested the blocking function with the clam functions and with another vm successfully blocked the eicar test file...

    While I cannot confirm or deny that the line is or is not an error, I think I can confirm that it existed before the 2.4.5 development freeze and that it has zero impact on functionality and probably not a blocker.

    edit#2:
    To clarify OP and my ???? in response the actual log line from normal config edits:

    php-fpm 766 /pkg_edit.php: [squid] - squid_resync function call pr: bp: rpc:no

    and

    php-fpm 767 /pkg_edit.php: [squid] - squid_resync function call pr: bp: rpc:no

    Actual log line from normal bootup:

    php-fpm 339 /rc.start_packages: [squid] - squid_resync function call pr: bp: rpc:no
  • How about now?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    551 Views
    jimpJ

    You'll know it's ready when the release is announced.

  • pf2.4.5 setup DHCP Static Mappings then lan down.

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    993 Views
    johnpozJ

    @yon-0 said in pf2.4.5 setup DHCP Static Mappings then lan down.:

    so I tried various parameter settings

    What? You don't just randomly change shit that has zero to do with anything hoping it fixes something

    dhcp has NOTHING to do with a device talking to another device... Its just a method to hand out info.. Doesn't matter if its reserved so client X gets specific IP or other info, or from a pool where client gets a random IP or static..

    Again if you are not actually going to provide info, and just say shit is not working nobody can help you! Lets see this device that has an IP and mask in your network trying to ping the pfsense IP 185.x.191.1 - Can it ping that or not? If not what are the firewall rules on the interface of pfsense...

    Etc... This got to be one of the most frustrating threads I have ever.. Again - there must be a language issue and I highly suggest you seek help in your native language.

  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    768 Views
    jimpJ

    I opened an issue and pushed a fix for the PHP error: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/10255

  • pf 2.4.5 upgrade openssl-1.1.1d

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    630 Views
    jimpJ

    Then you can't use OpenSSL 1.1.1. It will not work.

  • Enabling Avahi or UPnP crashes firewall

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    487 Views
    F

    Ok, I’ll wait as you suggest.

    It is working fine on 2.4.4-p3, both UPnP and Avahi.

  • Are we there yet?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    333 Views
    jimpJ

    Soon.

  • Error on upgrade to 2.5.0.a.20200210.1039

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    522 Views
    jimpJ

    It's already been fixed in the repo, new images have been building for a while, should be up any time now.

  • OpenVPN Bad compression stub 2.4.5-rc

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    6k Views
    stephenw10S

    The devices / drivers are named after whatever first supports them and they are named that upstream. It would be confusing if we changed that. Hence x86-64 architecture is known as amd64.

    Steve

  • 2.4.5-RC radvd: 4 DNS Servers one too many in DHCPv6 Options

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    454 Views
    M
    diff radvd.conf radvd_ng.conf 59c59 < RDNSS 2620:fe::fe 2620:fe::9 2a00:1098:2c::1 { }; --- > RDNSS 2620:fe::fe 2620:fe::9 2a00:1098:2c::1 2a00:1098:2b::1 { };
  • PIMD start even if PIMD is not enable

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    245 Views
    No one has replied
  • Release Candidate Daily Builds

    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    706 Views
    jimpJ

    It's more of a slush at the moment. We are only committing things there which are regression fixes or fixes for other showstoppers we find when testing. There are still a couple things hanging out there, mostly on our internal Redmine for the hardware we sell. For example there is still an issue we're working on with crypto on the SG-3100.

  • 2.4.5-RC build xxx ... Faster interface?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    NollipfSenseN

    @skogs It got a shot of pfSense steroid! ☺

  • i haveing problem with the ethernet connection

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    473 Views
    G

    @Gertjan yes

  • Avoid Update - Version 2.4.5.r.20200203.1429 issue

    41
    2 Votes
    41 Posts
    7k Views
    jimpJ

    The -latest files are a link to whatever the most recent timestamp is. It's a convenience link to get the most recent at that time. I would not use those, as you won't necessarily know from looking at the name if what you downloaded before is the most recent at a later date.

    So while it may be true that the ones you asked about were the same when you looked at that moment, that would not necessarily be true by the time someone else looked.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.