In Italy we must keep logs (squid + captive portal auth) for 5 years. In little networks I can't istall a second hw to keep logs (I should make redoundant each hardware, it's too expensive) I think it's better to keep all locally (in raid1+spare system) and burn data regularly ciao Giaco

there is a full ACL system in HEAD, so i guess 1.3 release will have this..

Look at this.  Just follow the instruction there. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2966.0.html

Thank you! I know where is the mistake ? I don't register the IAS server in active directory! Thank you also!

thanks for replying. for now, i used the method described in link above and it is working fine on 1.2RC3. If you have time, it will be nice to have

any info on this? /f

Did you try with full url ? Something like : http://www.google.com Worked for me as I can remember…

If you're refering to the pass-through lists, then yes. I had already added all my machine's MAC addresses to the list before turning on the Captive Portal.

hi all applications are working with my clients, my setup is as follows: squid page general settings: proxy interface: lan allow users on interface: checked transparent proxy: checked enabled logging: checked, "useful for squid report" squid cache management: keep all with default values and modify as per your computer specifications enabled offline mode: checked captive portal: enable captive portal checked interface: lan idel timeout: 10 minutes concurrent user logins: checked authentication: local user manger "make sure you add users all done all applications should be working with your clients good luck

Captive portal bypass is either all or nothing, unfortunately this isn't possible.

it would be unsuported but you can add stuff with the command pkg_add -r <package>eg pkg_add -r openldap</package>

search –> Captive portal multiple interfaces --> No not possible.

Interesting I will give this a go. I changed the password to be only numbers which solved it as I guess numbers are more "universal" in character sets..

i know it can run on PC, but damn we deployed so many units of diferent equipment, not even nesesary Mono or PF … and in all location we just never had enouph extra space... and still I dont understand why do it as separate package? The functions of per user bandwith control are quite usefull! amd user traffic monitorng are useful as well... I was trying to find why we were not able to see user bandwith but had no lack, something just does not populate the array although the accouting data is send to the radius on session terminate

use zeroshell live CD if you want to do this