@Gertjan Thanks! I found what you were referring to and noticed the dpinger processes. I don't have control of anything on the other side of my modem, but I do know the gateway address. I've had my IP change a few times over the year, to be honest... so I went with a google DNS server. It's 8 hops away, but it's not likely to change in the foreseeable future. Thanks for the assistance.

it is the same ;) I have migrated Forefront TMG:s that way. The only thing is to allow a private IP on the wan if of the sub FW

@stephenw10 I just add kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast from web UI in tunables and reboot the PFsense VM :)

@Wizard76 Thanks for the reply. Since my post, I've tried both ways and really haven't really seen a difference, even in CPU (and my 10 year old Q6600 needs all the help it can get...). Thanks again.

what version of Windows/Hyper-V is it?

No, as far as I know, it's not possible to add another NIC to that machine. If you are pushing 100GBytes/day through that one NIC, bear in mind that its 1Gb/s bandwidth will be pretty much split between WAN and LAN. If you aren't on gigabit fibre, it probably won't make much difference. You can use VLANs on ESXi in much the same way as you do with your managed switch. You will probably want to allocate at least two cores to pfSense, given the packages you run. I don't know much about the disk space or memory requirements for those packages but I suspect 6GB of RAM would be plenty. Someone else might be able to help with those numbers.

I suggest you give us some details to work with. How does it fail exactly? Any error messages? How does Vultr tell you to login to WebGUI? Usually they will assign you an IP address. Is your WAN configured with a public IP?

Has anyone tried this yet

Used 4000000 but I'm unable to improve it further. I honestly don't know what I should tweak or what's going on. On this image below, orange arrow shows when I downloaded the file from the pfSense VM. Green arrow shows when I used my server (where pfSense is running) [image: 1552041054856-screen-shot-2019-03-08-at-11.30.00.png] EDIT: Adding a video where you can see how it looks downloading from pfSense vs server (both connected with LAN). Looks like the pfSense is being limited to around 250mb? while the server can download at more speed for a limited amount of time. This is driving me crazy haha Video: https://d.pr/v/1OYQeP

@macduke I got it running, seems like everything is fine so far. I’m using unraid with virtio nics (also shared with the server as I only have 2 nic ports for now I have only got enabled the hardware checksum preference. I haven’t touched any other preference on unRaid or the VM

Do have configured pfSense via LAN interface and disabled it after? If so, that wasn't a good idea, as long as you haven't configured the WAN interface for accessing the firewall before. You will have to set rules on WAN to allow the access for the clients and for management. In addition there is also a rule on WAN by default which blocks any access from private networks. It's set in the WAN interface settings.

The main reason is the windows client required to maintain XenServer - I pretty much never have to boot that windows VM any more. They also removed a bunch of functionality I used from the free product. I was "stuck" at XenServer 6.2. Citrix basically lost me. I do pay Proxmox but since it's just one socket (with 12 cores) it is quite reasonable. Even for a home lab. I have some Dells in the garage and it's on the list to build a Ceph cluster with them.

@tibere86 Don't think so. In Hyper-V, I get the same response in the shell to "powerd -v" enabled or not. [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw.workgroup]/root: powerd -v powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory