• New User

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    863 Views
    ?
    Thank you very much. I did find under System->Firmware, Updater Settings tab, a check box for " Disable the automatic dashboard auto-update check.".  In my mind, I would rather see this as a submit button ala "Check for Updates" and then I could just hit it whenever.  I'm sure others will prefer the automated check. Good software lets users make choices and that is exactly what pfSense does in this case. me
  • Up-to-date supported hardware list

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    823 Views
    J
    http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.3R/hardware.html
  • Squid ssl intercept certificate ios chrome

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    909 Views
    No one has replied
  • Setting a gateway in a transparent setup

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    772 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiples Asterisk Registering to One SIP Provider

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    K
    Do you know by any chance how can I accomplish this, what is the configuration in siproxd.
  • Bad, very bad !

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S
    It is covered in the docs: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/PfSense_on_Watchguard_Firebox#Serial_Port_Quirk Your instructions are good though. Are you booting from a hard drive? There isn't normally a menu that gives you an option to boot to a prompt if you're booting nanobsd from a cf card. The reboot option should work but you will never be able to shutdown the box from software because the power supply is not atx compatible, it's not software controllable. Steve
  • RRD graph shows 52% loss

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    ?
    [image: hKwiRek.png]
  • Pfsense newbie questions (coming from smoothwall)

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    ?
    Your wireless can access your LAN clients without any issue so long as you permit it via the rules. My wireless clients connect to my media server which are both on different segments/vlans. True, any service that utilizes broadcast packets might not work, since that requires you to be on the same network/subnet/switch. Something like DLNA or Homegroups (windows vista/7/8). However there's even a work around for that too, but it's a bit over my head. I was just reading about it via another thread where a guy wanted to access windows shares between two different segments. WPA2 isn't bullet proof though, and if you have a bored neighbor they can still weasel their way in. Though you're right, it would take considerable amount of time - especially if you're using a solid random password. Though I'm just naturally paranoid, even when it's not needed :-P
  • Routing traffic to another WAN router?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    895 Views
    stephenw10S
    If you want it transparent you need to have it in between your clients and wan router. That means you need two interfaces. Steve
  • Multiple DSL accounts on one DSL line over wireless.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    665 Views
    No one has replied
  • Pfsense 2.1 - Active Active HA

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    L
    @nothing: A/A is just another source of problems made up by the jews to save money buying cheaper hardware  :P Hahahha….  ;D
  • Error Msg "Bump flowset buckets to 256 (was 0)"

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • How to access an OpenVPN client from LAN

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    770 Views
    No one has replied
  • Gateway goes down, no mail is sent

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    815 Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic graph

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    762 Views
    No one has replied
  • Question about file sharing

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    7k Views
    M
    Also remember to turn off password protected sharing in Windows 7 or Vista if that is what you are using for sharing.
  • I have no idea how this can work…VLANS + IPTV

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Macro/button/package to temporarily block access to internet

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    ?
    Easiest solution is on the interface tab (LAN for instance) you should have a pre-existing rule allowing internet, if you click the green arrow it will turn grey, indicating that rule is now "off" - essentially blocking interwebz for that interface. [image: AR9rOYo.png] **When I say "pre-existing" I mean to say a rule you created to allow internet traffic. Most people usually have something like * * * * *  meaning allow everything. I don't think pfsense creates such an internet rule for you automatically, just anti-lockout rules.
  • PFSense with 6 networkinterfaces

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    J
    @stephenw10: The i350 has been well tested under 2.1, there are many reports of successfully using that card if you search the forum. I've never used one myself though.  ;) Steve Works just fine. I've got an I350-T4 in my system at home and I'm about to add a pair of boxes at work which each have 12 ports of I350. They're great NICs. Low power and fast.
  • How-To LAG (I think)…

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    859 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.