The shell is tcsh, which differs from /bin/sh And if you're used to some other OS, /bin/sh there might even be something like bash Check the FreeBSD man pages for sh and tcsh to see what syntax works in each.

As detailed here: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Remote_Config_Backup The authentication system is different so you need to do a little more. Steve

Hi I also have this problem with 2.1 64-bit version on ESXi (both on 5.1 and 5.5). Really sad when the graphs get ruined. Same as you I also get it on IPv6 which I dont even use. [image: status_rrd_graph_img.png] [image: status_rrd_graph_img.png_thumb]

There should be no good reason why you can't access the pfSense webgui from your laptop connected via wifi. Here's what I would do. Connect the pfSense WAN interface to one of the switch ports on the WRT54. Set the pfSense WAN to use DHCP, it will then receive an IP from the WRT54. Set a firewall rule on the pfSense WAN interface to allow access to the webgui on WAN, so: source any, destination WAN address, port 443 (or 80 if your using http). Done, you should now be able to access it via a wifi connection to the WRT54. It sounds like you're trying something more complex, is there some reason for that? As you say it's good experience to try some thing new. Steve

You may need to upgrade the BIOS of the Dell.  I recently added memory to a Dell and couldn't get two dissimilar memory sticks to coexist until I upgraded the BIOS. If you try it, I would recommend upgrading the BIOS with just the original stick installed in case an issue with the new stick causes the BIOS update to fail and potentially brick the computer.

I managed to solve the problem by changing the configuration of the network addressing. [image: 264mmw5.jpg] Now i have Internet connection in my test platform.

My guess would be that pfsense uses a combination of time/packets (pps) and packet size (64-1500) to calculate speed (Mb/s). So it's possible there were a few large packet counts (maybe jumbo frames) for a few milliseconds and it screwed up the math? This is a complete BS answer I'm just guessing.

Well that Intel page also conflicts with the Dell specs page: http://www.dell.com/us/dfb/p/poweredge-r200/pd#TechSpec That also states ECC RAM and Xeon X3200 series CPUs. The chipset used supports ECC RAM: http://ark.intel.com/products/34387/Intel-3200-Memory-Controller The ECC line in the CPU spec seems irrelevant. The X3230 doesn't bother to list it. Steve

@ghackett: Namely, I have a domain name via dyndns, lets call it mydomain.com and I would like all traffic addressed to specific subdomains to be forwarded to different servers within my NAT… i.e. in-bound traffic to webhost1.mydomain.com would route to 192.168.0.2 and traffic to webhost2.mydomain.com would route to 192.168.0.3, etc. As I recall, the paid version of dyndns allows you to do redirection as well. What you can then do is to add a redirect Webhop for the individual sub-domains with individual ports. eg. webhost1.mydomain.com will redirect to <your wan="" ip="">:22 webhost2.mydomain.com will redirect to <your wan="" ip="">:23 And you'll use pfSense to port forward <your wan="" ip="">:22 to the internal server that hosts webhost1.mydomain.com And port forward <your wan="" ip="">:23 to the internal server that hosts webhost2.mydomain.com</your></your></your></your>

So when you say 'it's not VLAN'd off yet', you mean that everything is in the same network space, correct? The LAN and the Wireless network would be the same network then, so you would need a way to intercept and log packets from just the AP's. Is it possible? Yea… With Squid most likely... but it will be a pain. Better to just enable Squid globally, and give DHCP reservations to your LAN computers so you can differentiate between wired/wireless hosts.

As a side note, Im looking at about 10% of the speed currently I had a few weeks ago….

So, I guess it is worth mentioning that the LAN clients really can't access the server by host name locally as a limitation of the software they are connecting to.  It expects all clients on the 'base url', which I have to configure as the external fqdn.  I've yet to think of a way that I can have the services both internally and externally accessible at the same time, which is a problem other users have found.  This is not a pfsense issue. I think this one is unsolvable for what I need… at first I was hoping it would be as simple as some firewall rules, but I don't think it will work out. Thanks anyway to those who gave it a look.

@stephenw10: Watch the RRD WAN quality graphs to get some idea of your ping times and packet loss rate. In System: Routing: click the 'e' to edit your default gateway. Click advanced to access the apinger parameters. Try increasing them if they are below values you regularly see on your WAN. Alternatively you can disable apinger altogether as a test by checking 'Disable Gateway Monitoring'. Steve I've experiencing the same issue with my cable modem connection over the past few months. I ended up increasing the gateway monitoring parameters that Stephen is talking about. Once in a while I'll see some entries in the GW log but I can live with it, before it was 4-5 times a day. On another note, apinger has become really sensitive since 2.1. Before I changed my parameters, a speedtest within my provider networks would trigger an alarm. Stephen

Hello again, new problem. i have activated public 3g IP from my Carrier, and im trying To get it running. it says i should use the apn internet4 but it just doesnt work, it shows the green Arrow on wan that the link is up but no IP adress in the textbox under it. the modem is connected judging by the constant lightblue light. When i connect the modem to my computers usb port and enter apn internet4 it works, i get public ip address. any ideas? EDIT: Ok so now i it works, i just restarted the router a few times and removed the modem and put it back and nowi got public ip on my 3g connection! :)

#NSA #BUMP

@stephenw10: There is now package for apcupsd which is especially for this. There is no need to connect more than one machine to the UPS. Whichever machine is connected runs a daemon that broadcasts messages over the network to inform other machines, running the client, of the UPS status. I've not tried the pfSense package, it was only released a few days ago, so I don't know it's capabilities. It will be able to run in server mode in which case you would connect the UPS to the pfSense box and then configure the NAS to look at it. The NAS is probably running apcupsd underneath but I have no idea if it's able to be configured to allow a client on pfSense to lok at it. Try it and see. Steve Thanks for the suggestion Steve  ;D The Synology is running some (I don't know which one yet) server, so I would need a tool that gets the signal from the Synology. I already found the thread of the apcupsd package, so I will ask there too. [image: ups004.jpg] [image: ups004.jpg_thumb]

i have just started experiencing this problem. though it seems to be occuring with add-on intel cards see also http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,70832.0.html

Or better yet, once it's solved post a summary of what the problem was and how it was fixed, for future reference.

Well its a 16-bit EtherExpress 10/100, so its not cardbus (32-bit). USB adapter was recognized for its chipset (dmesg showed it and the system reacted when I unplugged/plugged it in).  But apparently no native drivers. Flipping the interfaces from wan/lan to lan/wan had no effect, other than the collisions stayed with the 16-bit card. I'm hoping its a faulty card.  pfsense box is now back on the test bench pending arrival of the DLink (hcl compatible) pcmcia card.  I may try to load drivers for the USB adapter just for grins while I wait for the big brown truck to arrive later this week. More later.