• NAT on virtual interface

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Auto redirect to site-info if WAN failure

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    Cry HavokC

    Not currently, you could always raise a bounty.

  • Network statistic feature

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    What's about ntop? I've heard there is a package for pfSense? Is it still working?

  • Vmware + wireless AP

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • DNSSec in pfSense

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    sigiS

    Nope,

    the used dnsmasq is a relative simple forwarder.
    If you wan to support DNSSEC, you have to install a "real" nameserver. And for DNSSEC do not underestimate memory and crypto performance. I would prefer a real DNS-Server inside my boundaries…

  • Technical information in PfSense…

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    Thx :)

  • Can I install the non-embedded install to a micro-drive?

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    Cry HavokC

    You obviously haven't read the hardware sizing page ;)

  • My dmesg (Does everything look okay?)

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    Thanks guys. That sounds good. Everything is working fine I just wanted to double check ;)

  • Load balance/failover problem with FTP service

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    M

    I am also seeing sort of similar problems with 1.2.3 (also tried 1.2.3 RC snapshot)…

    I am trying to do inbound load balancing in front of 7 servers with different services, with 2 of them completely idle.

    I keep seeing: "slbd[327]: TCP poll failed to start to 10.1.1.106:143 in default (Operation now in progress)" and the service gets marked as bad.  10.1.1.106 is one of the idle servers.

    So I am not sure if OP's problem is just related to FTP or an incoming load balancing problem in general.

  • Slow usb lan please help

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    R

    well i see …its at the moment more a generell freebsd problem on the most USB1.x adapters  if i am not wrong

  • Auto-Reboot?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    8k Views
    Cry HavokC

    SSH on to your pfSense host and enter vi /etc/crontab.  You may want to learn how to use vi first ;)

  • Tuning for full blown PCs

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    The issues that loader.conf can cause/resolve are so pronounced that you would HAVE to modify it to even use the router at all.  If you're seeing >10% of your bandwidth come through the pfSense box/proxy, then you're likely not affected.  Most of the issues have been corrected with more recent versions of the squid package as well as bumps in the underlying FreeBSD versions.

  • Help:: Pfsense 1.2.2 with 30 vlan and traffic shaper

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    R

    Hi dreamslacker, wow..  very good!

    I'm testing in lab on IBM xserver x226 - 1 Intel Xeon /1GB ram/sas 150GB mirror raid
    with on board broadcom (wan interface) and a old 3com 10/100 (lan interface)

    I have to configure pfsense for obtain bandwidth management,
    I must allocate equals bandwidth for each Vlan..
    I'm testing this… but unfortunately ..don't wants apply my rule..

    pls.. tell me if is correct:
    menu -> firewall -> traffic shaper -> pfSense Traffic Shaper Wizard
    and go to Setup network speeds ( interface: vlanXX and set adequate download/upload kbs)
    this for each Vlan interface... is ok?

    thx !!

    I look forward to your kind reply.
    Robert

  • Is there a way to see what ips are using the bandwidth?

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    C

    Would be nice to have the top bandwidth users at a glance, tested rate but it only show one line, with the public IP of the firewall, not the real users inside… Should I change somewhere the interface being monitored?

    I'm using transparent proxy by the way...

  • Would this do well as a managed switch to create vlans from?

    Locked
    30
    0 Votes
    30 Posts
    9k Views
    ?

    Firewalls!. The pfSense firewall rules can be used to control communication between interfaces/subnets. The pfSense firewall capability is based on the BSD pf firewall facility so you could do some reading on that to better understand what can be done with pfSense.

    Never used the freebsd firewalls before, I only am familiar with iptables. I will do reading :D

  • DMZ access to LAN and WAN trouble

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    E

    From which IP 172.16.x.x are you trying to ping which IP 10.x.x.x?
    Your second rule in NAT will be never applied but this is not a problem now.

  • Do I need to bridge LAN and WAN, or does NAT do that?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    P

    What exactly does bridging do?

    if you set it to "bridge" it basically creates a Layer 2(data link) type connection. however, i know you can create filtered bridges also… (someone please correct me if i am wrong here...)  i've always thought of bridges as switches with fewer ports or in your case, one port.

    Does it just allow two interfaces to see each other?

    it allows them to act as if they are connected to the same switch.

    For example, without bridging my laptop (wireless) and desktop (LAN) couldn't ping each other.  However, with it enabled then they could?

    makes sense… you either needed firewall rules or you had a routing issue. prolly firewall...

    Also, I had to enable a bridge between Wireless and LAN so that my wireless could use the LAN DHCP server.  I guess that makes sense but is that a common way to set it up?

    if i understand you correctly, it sounds like you have a wireless access point or router connected to an interface on your pfsense firewall. personally i would not set it up that way. (assuming this SOHO WAP)for security reasons, disable bridge, keep the wireless access point on a seperate interface (i think this is how you have it now), disable the dhcp server on your WAP, set a static IP for the LAN on your WAP, then move your ethernet cord so that it's on a switch port and not the WAN port.  this way your WAP should act like a switch with wireless enabled. then set dhcp server on your firewall accordingly and your wireless hosts should pick up the dhcp from pfsense.  be careful the order at which you do this or you'll lock yourself out of your WAP.  set the LAN static IP first. then disable the dhcp server on the wap.

    once you have that all working and have enabled dhcp on pfsense for your WAP then configure firewall rules accordingly to permit access into your LAN. if your only using the subnets which reside on the pfsense interfaces then you shouldn't have to mess with NAT either..

    hope this helps…

  • Possible to disable the PC speaker?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    5k Views
    R

    Great! Thanks, brah.  :)

  • Please help a noob

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    Cry HavokC

    Captive Portal

    You'll find a forum on the subject further down.

  • PFTPX client reset connection

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    I

    Weird! seems to be symantec endpoint protection talking to a bunch of FTP sites… 69.22.137.48 is what i gather to be a symantec ip. Very strange as we are all locally managed for symantec updates.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.