• Strange beahviors in 2.6 release

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    527 Views
    jimpJ

    There isn't enough information to go on here, there aren't any known issues that match what you describe exactly.

    Are you certain your users aren't set with the privilege that denies config changes? It's a common error people make when setting up users and groups to select the entire list, which also includes the privilege which denies them the ability to change the configuration.

    Check the system log and see if it's logging any errors when you try to make changes.

    It's also possible you have a hardware problem. Some SSDs and similar media can fail into a read-only state where they won't persistently store changes.

  • Difference of whitebox vs SG-6100

    35
    0 Votes
    35 Posts
    5k Views
    N

    @bingo600 said in Difference of whitebox vs SG-6100:

    @nimrod
    That is NOT correct ...

    Whats not correct ? Did you even watch the youtube video i posted in previous post? Im not the only one having this issue and there is a good reason why is there a jumper in the first place.

    Maybe you can force it to to Power-On with the jumper , and that might not be a bad choice.

    You dont seem to understand. What i did is not "forcing it to power on". Its the ONLY WAY to make it power on after power loss.

    Jumper is set to position 1-2 by default. Changing the BIOS setting does nothing. Setting the jumper to postion 2-3 powers on device as soon as the power is applied. At that point, BIOS setting is still doing nothing. Is that so difficult to accept or understand ?

    But I have tested the power settings on my Qotoms , and it has been doing precisely what i told it to in the Bios.

    And i absolutely believe what you said. Thats exactly what the problem is. You are talking about YOUR higher end device which is obviously not the same model as the cheapest device im talking about.

    But when the Bios is "cleared" due to checksum error (bad battery) , and the default is to "Power Off" after powerfailure, then it is what it is doing.

    I dont have any checksum errors, nor i have need to clear BIOS. As i said, this is brand new device. Not even month old.

    I will exit from this discussion, as i thought you would be open for new info.

    I dont know why are you taking this personally? Im very open to new info. Im just saying that MY device is not behaving same as YOUR device. This is cheap Celeron J series device, and you are having higher end i3/i5/i7 devices that are obviously designed differently.

    But you just seems determined to "Bash Qotom" , and that is your choice.

    i have absolutely no reason to bash Qotom or glorify any other brand. Im way too old for that, and this is just a cheap aluminium box that gets the job done. You need to accept the fact that this cheaper model is not built and designed the same way as the higher end Qotom devices you have.

    Again, im not glorifying Protectli, but from chepest FW2 model to highest end FW6E model, BIOS is behaving the same. If the hardware feature is not on the board, there will be no setting(s) for it in the BIOS.

    Obviously, thats not the case with Qotom. On the cheapest model that i have, there is a setting in the BIOS for a feature which is not BIOS controlled, but jumper controlled.

    And then, there are higher end i5 and i7 models which YOU have, and they have this same setting that actually works as it should.

    Thats called quality inconsistency. So what i said, are facts, not bashing.

    I will just not participate longer.

    /Bingo

    Never get emotionally attached to a brand. Its just a cheap metal box. I have nothing against you or Qotom. I will continue to buy them and recommend them despite the issues i had with cheapest models. At the end, you get what you pay for.

  • DNS Forwarder crashing after upgrade

    Locked
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    549 Views
    stephenw10S

    Continued here: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/171218/dnsbl-stopped

  • Ntopng dont start correctly

    43
    0 Votes
    43 Posts
    9k Views
    stephenw10S

    Well that's what the gui shows. So... it could be gui version I guess. I won't pretend to be an expert on ntop-ng!

    It sure looks like it's v5.0 in the port:
    https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commit/84c9db61e287493d33f24c5cb108908f56a801ca

    That's in 2.6.

  • Routing Traffic Across 2 VPNs

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    491 Views
    planedropP

    @stephenw10 You are 100% absolutely right, knew it had to be something stupid I was missing lol. Good to go now ,thanks!

  • Poor performance on pfSense Proxmox VM - IPTV loosing connection

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S

    Ah, great result. Also good to know Proxmox does that, I hadn't hit that yet on my in install.

    Steve

  • Syslog parser for Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps Discovery

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    742 Views
    stephenw10S

    You can change the log format in 2.6/22.01 to use RFC 5424 instead:
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/monitoring/logs/settings.html#global-log-settings

    The filter log format is described here:
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/monitoring/logs/raw-filter-format.html

    Steve

  • How does MTU actually function GUI->real???

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    2k Views
    MrPeteM

    @johnpoz 'twas not an issue on the HE site. Just had to set 1492 there since I am using PPPoE.

    and yes, I can and now have forced it on my end.

    Just more than a little surprised to see a default of 1280?!!!

    And YES @stephenw10 , I could ping the far end of the tunnel way beyond the MTU. Crazy.

    And now, I can ping the far end of the tunnel with 8 bytes more than the outside world.

    Here: Near, Far, GoogleBad, GoogleGood ;)

    [2.6.0-RELEASE][root@jasmine.ds.org]/root: ping6 -nms 1452 2001:470:39:3c7::2 PING6(1500=40+8+1452 bytes) 2001:470:39:3c7::2 --> 2001:470:39:3c7::2 1460 bytes from 2001:470:39:3c7::2, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.180 ms ^C --- 2001:470:39:3c7::2 ping6 statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.148/0.163/0.180/0.013 ms [2.6.0-RELEASE][root@jasmine.ds.org]/root: ping6 -nms 1452 2001:470:39:3c7::1 PING6(1500=40+8+1452 bytes) 2001:470:39:3c7::2 --> 2001:470:39:3c7::1 1460 bytes from 2001:470:39:3c7::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=5.750 ms ^C [2.6.0-RELEASE][root@jasmine.ds.org]/root: ping6 -nms 1452 google.com PING6(1500=40+8+1452 bytes) 2001:470:39:3c7::2 --> 2607:f8b0:400f:802::200e ^C --- google.com ping6 statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss [2.6.0-RELEASE][root@jasmine.ds.org]/root: ping6 -nms 1444 google.com PING6(1492=40+8+1444 bytes) 2001:470:39:3c7::2 --> 2607:f8b0:400f:802::200e 76 bytes from 2607:f8b0:400f:802::200e, icmp_seq=0 hlim=119 time=6.146 ms
  • system logs settings not apply

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    422 Views
    C

    @stephenw10
    no rotation
    sorry it's 22.01 which is the last version.
    It's a Netgate 6100.
    I'm new with Netgate and pfsense + ; i've always used pfsense CE with amd64/pc archi.
    Maybe causing by importing CE xml config into Netgate pf plus ?

  • Enabling RADIUS as authentication server spams NPS every second

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    626 Views
    J

    @stephenw10 I don't know enough about the integration (I haven't had time to read through the code), but I have seen xml-rpc mentioned

  • pfSense 2.6 typo..

    3
  • Openssl && CVE-2022-0778

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    714 Views
    L

    @jimp

    Perfect, very thanks !

  • Apple devices internet connection drops

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    pfsense has a 'recipe' for this type of setup.

    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/external-wireless-router.html?highlight=wireless%20router

    By the way, if you plug Mercury the WAN port into pfsense LAN port, pfsense logs will show the IP address/traffic of only the Mercury. This is because wireless clients are behind Mercury FW/NAT.

    By using both LAN ports (LAN to LAN port) you bypass the internal Mercury software/apps which at this point is essentially a just switch with WiFi.

    Hope this helps.

  • Interface Assignments Won't Delete

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    738 Views
    N

    @johnpoz Thank you for the information. Just as you said, it was because they were not enabled.

  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    H

    @pzanga were you ever able to get PPPOE setup in PFSense behind the Arris NVG443G with Frontier? I have been trying for days to get this working with no luck! I even tried a call to support where i was told to basically give up cause they do not support it. I dont want to give up as i still think this is possible i just think im missing something. Any guidance on your setup would be a huge help.

  • Since about 1400 hours I have been unable to get updates in dashboard

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    T

    @stephenw10 Removed IP4 preference and confirmed working. Also did a tracert pkg01-atx.netgate.com - 20 hops on IPv6 vs 13 for IPv4 - thought IPv6 routing was supposed be slicker!

    Tracing route to pkg01-atx.netgate.com [2610:160:11:18::209]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 2001:4d48:ad5c:fe10::254
    2 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms 2001:4d48:feed:97::138
    3 10 ms 10 ms * 2001:4d48:feed:97::1
    4 9 ms * 10 ms 2001:4d48:feed:99::a
    5 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 2001:4d48:ace::43
    6 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms ams-ix-1.enta.net [2001:7f8:1::a500:8468:1]
    7 15 ms 19 ms 22 ms er1.ams1.nl.above.net [2001:7f8:1::a500:6461:1]
    8 * * * Request timed out.
    9 * * * Request timed out.
    10 * * * Request timed out.
    11 126 ms * 126 ms ae5.cs1.lhr11.uk.eth.zayo.com [2001:438:ffff::407d:1d7e]
    12 * * * Request timed out.
    13 * * * Request timed out.
    14 134 ms 130 ms * 2001:438:ffff::407d:1c9e
    15 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms ae8.mpr1.aus1.us.zip.zayo.com [2001:438:ffff::407d:1b1e]
    16 123 ms 123 ms 123 ms 2001:438:ffff::407d:20c6
    17 124 ms 124 ms 124 ms 2610:160::ffff:4014:e59e
    18 123 ms 123 ms 123 ms 2610:160:11:1::6
    19 124 ms 123 ms 123 ms 2610:160:11:1000::6
    20 124 ms 123 ms 123 ms 2610:160:11:18::209

  • Delay when open Webpages

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    U

    Thanks to all!

    I installed the latest version, use DNS Resolver and disable the "DHCP Registration".
    IPv6 is disabled.

    I will see if its now better.

    Thank you!

  • Change Interface Name

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    544 Views
    stephenw10S

    You could choose not to pass though the hardware and then set the virtual NICs as e1000. Then they will use the em(4) driver and match.

    Steve

  • Resolver log seems to never be up to date.

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    601 Views
    stephenw10S

    Level 1 is the default. Logging queries can produce a lot of logs of your network is at all busy. It's usually unnecessary. I only set that logging level when trying to diagnose something.

    Steve

  • self-paced PfSense courses?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    625 Views
    stephenw10S

    Our own training is now also online and self-paced: https://www.netgate.com/training

    Steve

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.