@xbipin:
i just noticed that if i use 2 WAN connections in a fail over manner, i can create interface groups for them but they dont appear under NAT port forward so cant create port forwarding to both WANs at once, still need to add per interface, is this be design or its a bug?
Hello,
How do you use NAT in multi WAN scenario.
What I want: in case of a failure of one WAN, the NATing will have to change according to which WAN connection i up.
otherwise the packets leaving the router to the wrong ISP will not be able to be routed by the relevant ISP(wrong nat).
How do you create port forwarding rules from the same LAN private ip to different wan public ips?
For example: I have 2 WANs with 16 public ips each
In my WAN1 connection I let my LAN users go out from WAN1_StaticIP_10th
and in my WAN2 connection let the LAN users NAT to WAN2_StaticIP_8th
I use manual outbound rules for that. I use some 1:1 rules for my webservers in DMZ.
Up to here everything works fine. I cannot figure out how to use manual outbound NAT with multiWAN.
1) You say "port forwarding to both WANs at once".
Do you refer to NAT-forwarding or manual advanced NAT-oubound rules?
Are these 2 manual NAT possible?
source dest dest port NAT address
LAN * 80 WAN1_StaticIP_10th
LAN * 80 WAN2_StaticIP_8th
Will the above together with a
MultiWAN setup (group in TIER1 categories and firewall rule using the group as gateway)
work and guarantee that after failover I will be able to NAT?
2) What about a Email server in my DMZ (static NAT)? May I have 2 lines for every LAN address in NAT1:1rules (similar to the above)?
I have requested to add 2 addresses in the MX records with the same priority (one the WAN1_staticIP_6th + WAN2_staticIP9th).
If (1) and (2) cannot be done should I use second IPs in LAN and DMZ hosts and have
one for the WAN1 and one for the WAN2?
Sorry in advance for being too verbose or too idiot….
Michail