Weird, yeah sounds like one of the NICs has a hardware issue of some sort.

Or just two bad cables. :) Glad that fixed it.

We haven't even looked at it prior to now. At a quick review, it doesn't work in 2.3 either on that hardware. That's so far down my list of priorities it won't get any attention for 2.3 at a minimum. If someone wants to dig into it, you're more than welcome. It's either a hardware issue or a FreeBSD issue.

Do the axiomtek devices front panel work with pfSense? They look really neat

Not the VPN module for sure because it it based on the Intel QuickAssist which is not inserted
in the pfSense code now, the others work like expected as normal LAN Ports (NIC modules)
with Intel NICs. Their appliances generally working great together with pfSense since a long
time period, as you can read here; Axiomtek NA-810A/B

Or if you mean not the module bays but more the LED lights you could ask in this thread here
where someone is using the both variants of the NA342 together as a cluster, one with Intel
Celeron J1900 and one with the Intel Atom E3825 his name is @klauskurz; axiomtek na-342

PC Engnies APU2 Board since january 2016 ~250 €
Another case for the APU + 2 LAN Ports & SSD/HDD like the APU but + ~150 €
Jetway Board only ~$199
Varia store dual rackmount box ~60 €
4 Port appliance ~$299
5 Port appliance ~$305
Axiomtek

NA341 ~425 € NA342 & NA342R ~280 € or ~ price unknown NA361 & NA361R ~650 € or ~850 €

P.S. in january 2016 the APU2B4 is coming out and that would be much better then the older APU ones.

Something tells me OPs old laptop isn't USB 3.0.

First off I don't know if this goes under this topic but I'm imagining this is a hardware problem.

But what pfSense version you are running there?
And on what medium you where installing it right?

I had to shutdown and restart my PF Sense machine a few weeks ago and today I went to turn it back on and I'm getting the error 128 lba 303.

On which medium pfSense was installed?

A few posting out there advised me to disable AHCI from the BIOS which I have done and rebooted and I am still getting the same error. I'd really rather not re-install PF Sense if I can help it as I'd need to reconfigure the entire box from scratch.

Why not re-install pfSense and then you only have also to re-install the saved config and all is done!

Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?

Go to the BIOS and then try to set up the right LBA mode for the HDD/SSD, CFCard, mSATA, DOM-SSD,
SATA-DOM or CFast card!

@BlueKobold:

i have an intel atom n270 1.6 ghz single core (with ht) based system using nano bsd off of my kingston 4gb old usb

better to use a hdd or ssd with a full install

it has 1gb ddr2 ram ..

2 GB - 4 GB should be fine pending on the traffic

i have ppoe connection 4 Mbps. is above system capable of running snort ?

Perhaps yes, perhaps not, this will be also pending on the by you awaited throughput that
you need. It might be running but then please have a look to the throughput that you are
getting out.

its a home setup .. 5-6 users at most ..

One user can smash this or take all power and 50 don´t, this is also pending on what they are doing!

i jsut want to learn it ..

Then don´t ask and try it out but as before declared with a full install on a HDD or SSD.

well i have setup things on it ..
usign 4 wireless ssids (just for testing … later will do some usefull stuff with them ).

snort is working fine after some sleepless hours..

ssd is ordered waiting of it to arrive ..

so if snort doestn survives reboot how can i ensure it should .
can i just copy the /var to some other location and when system is rebooted recopy them ?

@Keljian:

What packages are you running?

Installed packages:

bandwidthd
darkstat
mailreport
nmap
nut
OpenVPN Client Export Utility
pfBlockerNG

Remark: internet connection is now 500mbit (up&down) FTTH

Also, thank you for posting your results, it's actually encouraging to see that other atoms on a similar platform perform at a level that I can reason with. To be honest I was almost worried there was something that I was missing and that some subset of new intel procs had magically figured out how to parallelize CBC… lol

I've used both the Cisco SG200-08 (Model #: SLM2008T-NA), and Netgear GS108T (Model #: GS108T-200NAS).

Like the Cisco SG200-08 more.

Thanks for your help. I went with system I posted above and added a 32GB SSD and 8GB of RAM. I ended up buying it directly from MITXPC vs. Amazon. Looking forward to getting it.

I noticed in your CPU comparison, you didn't specific the Celeron N2930. Where does that fit in the list?

Need more details regarding how you're running iperf.
tcp?
how many streams?
udp?
to pfSense?
from pfSense?
through pfSense?
what NICs?
what's the desktop?
what's the switch?

Lenovo TS140 or Dell T20 mini-tower SMB servers are often found on sale <=$300 with E3 v3 xeons (12x5 = haswell quads @ 3ghz+). You will need to add at least 1 NIC for ports, fortunately duals and quads are quite cheap on fleabay ($10~50), I suggest 82571 intel chipset versions or anything intel really.

These machines are powerful enough to do pretty much anything a home firewall would want, even if you are lucky enough to have 1Gbit.

I would keep an eye out for really good deals soon as the holiday sales start up and intel just released the E3 v5 skylake platform* so vendors will be probably be looking to unload current stock faster than usual. I intend to give them a hand ;)

*don't let the v5 vs v3 bother you: skylake is only a tiny bit faster than haswell and didn't add anything of note for pfsense purposes, v4 broadwell release was 99% vapor, 1% obscure.

The board is GIGABYTE GA-AM1M-S2H. Thank you sir for the speedy reply!

::)
There is a so called serial com port and you will only need a null modem cable for ~$6.00
or you might be using the USB Ports by taking a serial to USB adapter for ~$10.00 - $25.00  ;)

I'm trying to use pfsense as a firewall/router/web filter/IDS.

Nearly a really UTM without AV scanning, or?

For how many users this pfSense box must be running well, please?
200, 400 or 1000 users? A greater or newer model should be used
Witch other services do you use that are "eating" the CPU power?
Perhaps something like DPI?
Another CPU would be fine
Do you use Squid as a proxy?
Perhaps a SSD will help speeding things up?

Processor: 2.40 GHz Dual-Core Xeon (3060) - 800/4MB

Available for ~$10 at eBay

Memory: 8GB - (4 x 2GB) - DDR2 - DDR2 ECC

Ok

Hard Drive #1: 80GB - SATA II - 7200RPM

A mSATA or SATA III SSD would be fine and would be speeding up caching using Squid.

PCIe Card #1 (FH): Dual Port Gigabit NIC - PCIe

Can be all, please tell us the vendor or upgrade this against a Dual or Quad Port card from Intel.

There are many options for you:

Upgrading the existing box with a SSD and an Intel server NIC (2 or 4 Port)
If this not is helping out, you could use this as spare parts for another one! Intel Celeron J1900 pfsense Box Box 1 Box 2 SG-2440, SG-4860 or SG-8860 units from the pfSense store Self made box based on Supermicro Intel Atom C2000 (Rangeley) Boards Axiomtek NA342, NA342R, NA361, NA361R appliances Xeon E3-1241 Quad Core CPU starting @3,0GHz Intel Xeon D-1540

For sure not only for the 50 MBit/s WAN throughput but more tended to the other services you run on the box
and perhaps the number of users this box is serving.

@Gimli:

Thanks Corvey. I ended up finding some else's guide while you were writing this up but it's pretty much what I did. After downloading the tool you have in section 1 of your post I followed the following guide, except I used a DOS boot usb stick instead of what's in there, but the commands are the same:

http://support.bull.com/ols/product/platforms/bullion/bullionExtendedMemory/dl/no-frmf/g/adapt_fw/FW-I350_X520/Ethernet_Intel_I350-X520_PreBoot_ReadMe.pdf

My i350-T4 works great with FreeBSD and pfSense now.

;D

Cool, Gimli.  I researched and figured it out myself and made some quick sloppy directions on the way I did it, but that link you posted is probably better and more
detailed to get the job done.    Someone had to post a how to  ;D  so now there are multiple sources to choose from!

@boygrunge

PC Engine APU Board APU1D4 would be a budget suggestion, but that runs for sure pfSense with ease

Jetway NF9HG-2930 Thin mini-ITX Network Motherboard Board only option for self assembling
Jetway NF9HG-2930 Intel Celeron Quad Core ready to go box and powerful enough for a long time

Interesting, I've had no problem with the builtin Broadcom's on my boxes, most of them run as the WAN interface.

I do make a point of trying to bring those boxes up to the latest BIOS version available as they typically come as repurposed servers that haven't seen updates in forever.

Maybe I've just been lucky?

As always YMMV  ;)

Well, clearly the image got either miswritten, or your SD is too small for 4GB to fit on it. Try with 2GB one instead.