• Soekris 6501 and 500Mbps+ route

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    @acharge:

    Woaw,

    thanks for you reply !!

    Atom 8 cores are awesome ! I will check that. Do you know a very cool embedded board with this processor ?

    Have a nice day

    A.

    C2758 - http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Atom/X10/A1SRi-2758F.cfm
    C2750 - http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Atom/X10/A1SAi-2750F.cfm

  • LGA1150 compatible hardware

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    Series 7 chipsets were the last ones that came together with 8257x controllers.

    Series 8 will almost always be built with a i21x ethernet controller due to intel bundling them together for a discount. Some of these discounts are probably pretty big, its the only way I can explain certain motherboards with onboard 10GbE being as cheap as they are. (~$400 for brand new X540 dual port, ~$500 if you want a LGA2011 board and SAS HBA glued to it)

    There might be hard to find exceptions (don't know any off top of my head) and likely cost more than just getting a separate card. So unless your case cannot fit a card, there is your solution :)

    That is also assuming they don't go the typical ultra-cheap route and just use a realjunk controller instead.

  • Agere ET-131x Gigabit Ethernet Chipset

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    607 Views
    jimpJ

    The base OS on pfSense 2.1.x is FreeBSD 8.3, whereas on 2.0.x it was FreeBSD 8.1. So the drivers are likely to be newer and perhaps behave better, but without digging through FreeBSD's source to compare between those versions it's tough to say exactly what if anything changed in the driver.

    pfSense 2.2 is based on FreeBSD 10.x and is even more likely to work well on that hardware, but it's still some distance from release or production quality yet.

    You're better off spending a few more bucks on known-good hardware (e.g. Intel NICs) than trying to hope an off-brand works well.

  • Bypass ethernet ports pfsense supported?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    926 Views
    stephenw10S

    pfSense doesn't support by-pass ports directly and usually you would not ever want that feature on a firewall.
    The issue would be that the bypass feature must be capable of being disabled either by jumpers or in the bios otherwise it will quickly bypass the ports after the watchdog timer expires (30s perhaps). An alternative would be to write your own code which keeps the watchdog happy but that would be a last resort.

    Steve

  • What does pfsense PPPoe use for?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    889 Views
    pttP

    https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=PPPoE+server

    https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?board=28.0

  • Null cable modem usb? For Alix2d2

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    P

    and if you want some actual cable length, I have bought these (using one now on an Alix 2D13 serial):
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000067SCH/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1

  • Problem with Alix2d2 board Need Assistance

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    908 Views
    J

    I've never seen a USB-to-RS232 adapter which is configured for null modem use.  Get an adapter.

  • Is Transparent FW the Solution x__x ?!

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    872 Views
    J

    If you don't actually want to use a transparent setup you can hide it from a tracert by using policy routing.  I consider it a bug.  Others a feature.

    https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/932

  • Purchase appliance or custom build?

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    5k Views
    S

    Got a Kill-A-Watt and measured idle power draw of several different types of hardware for general comparison. Looks like I need to replace my current setup before I spend too much on additional electricity usage.

    Initial setup
    Case: eMachines micro-ATX mini tower
    Motherboard: Supermicro PDSBM-LN2+
    CPU: Intel Xeon 3060
    PSU: Enermax EG465P-VE 460W
    Disk: Western Digital 80GB HDD
    NICs: Dual onboard Intel 82573L WAN/LAN, Intel Pro/100 PCI for WiFi AP

    Current setup same as initial except
    PSU: Antec VP450 450W

    Test setup 1 same as initial except
    Case: ABMX rackmount 1U
    PSU: Ablecom 520W 1U
    NICs: Intel Pro/1000 MT PCI-X in PCI slot

    Test setup 2
    Case: generic ATX tower
    Motherboard: Supermicro C2SEA
    CPU: Intel Q8300
    PSU: Antec Neopower 650 Blue 650W
    Disk: Seagate 7200.12 500GB HDD
    NICs: Onboard Realtek RTL8111C for LAN1, Intel Pro/1000 PT x2 for WAN1/WAN2, Intel Pro/1000 CT for LAN2

    Idle power draw

    Initial setup: 70W
    Current setup: 61W
    Test setup 1: 69W
    Test setup 2: 54W

    and just for grins

    Dell Optiplex 980/i3-530/pfsense: 36W
    Dell Optiplex 980/i3-530/Win7: 34W
    HP 8200 Elite/i5-2500/Win7: 24W
    HP 8200 Elite SFF/i5-2400/Win7: 25W

  • This could be great

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    @deagle:

    Is the embedded NIC Intel from the SoC?

    According to Intel, ATOM E3815/E3825 do not include integrated LAN.
    Probably a Realtek (if I may guess).

  • Fit-PC or Hacom

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    J

    Bandwidth requirements?  Running squid & squidguard on a D525 Atom might not be a great idea depending on what kind of connection you've got.

  • Working hardware in PC Engines's APU boards.

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ

    I don't know the original make/model as it was a system pull from an Acer Aspire One, but this card works fine:

    ath0: <atheros 2424="" 5424=""> mem 0xfea00000-0xfea0ffff at device 0.0 on pci4 ath0: [ITHREAD] ath0: AR2425 mac 14.2 RF5424 phy 7.0</atheros>
  • MOVED: NAT not working correctly?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    495 Views
    No one has replied
  • Google 1Gb hardware recomendations

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    6k Views
    J

    I've got the C2758 variant.  Works great under 2.1.1 now that the upgraded Intel drivers are back in the build.  The only warning I'll give is that you'll have a grand total of (2) working USB ports.  Most of the ports on this board are 3.0 and that doesn't work yet.

  • Alix and intel error

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    V

    You may add a /boot/loader.conf.local file by touch command for addational config settings. Then just edit it and add the line "legal.intel_ipw.license_ack=1".

    Then the error massages will be gone.

  • New Alix board for 2013

    Locked
    265
    0 Votes
    265 Posts
    264k Views
    jimpJ

    Locking the topic, thanks for all the information everyone!

    If you wish to add something unique then start a new thread about a specific topic regarding the APU.

  • Maipu 1800

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    781 Views
    No one has replied
  • Bad performance on 2.1

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    863 Views
    C

    The CPU is used by serveral php-processes …

  • An 'off the shelf' small server for pfSense?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Thank you all for your replies. In the mean time I stumbled upon an offer I couldn't refuse; a Dell R200 (see sig) for very little money, and 1 HP V1910-48G for even less money. I have been fighting with this machine for a couple of days (not necessarily the machine's fault, as I fight with every machine I come across  ;D) and I have to say by now it is working very well.

    Now I would love to get my two pfSense machines in full automatic CARP, but it appears that won't be easy. Well, at least I now have a backup pfSense and a backup switch.

    Ah, before I forget, for future noobs like me: I bought this machine as it was on sale (refurbished) in the pfSense store on this very forum. If the great men (and women?) who create pfSense sell a Dell R200 there should be no doubt that it will work, so hence my purchase (not from pfSense, as it appeared shipping these machines from the USA to Amsterdam was triple the cost of the appliances itself thanks to the mentally retarded 'Fedex'-and alikes of this world. It would amount to 500-600 USD just to put these in the belly of the big Boeing).

    Thank you again for your suggestions  ;D

  • GA-H87N-WIFI

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    It will easily fit in the M350 Universal Mini-ITX enclosure.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.