@ddepaolis said in CPU / RAM Sizing: In this scenario, CPU usage is actually between 1 and 5% maximum and memory is stable to 7% Whilst passing 1Gbps? Probably fine then. Steve

Yes and yes! The SG-1000 is still supported and I'm not aware of any plans to stop doing so. Steve

I would expect it to run fine though it will be expensive to run compared with a newer more efficient hardware. And probably loud. I you already have it you're unlikely to offset the cost of buying new in energy saving. Give it a try. Steve

@stephenw10 when I get a chance tonight or tomorrow If I haven’t figure it out I’ll post some screenshots for you thank taking your time to reply to me.

I would look for one of the much older Intel NICs then. Something that predates those features you don't want. The FreeBSD Realtek driver has had issues for a long time. Some versions of that chip will give problems. Others, such as that one in the APU, seem to run fine. Realteks own driver generally performs better with the problem chips versions and that is now available as a package. I have not personally tried that TP-Link card. YMMV Steve

Yes, if you're running IPSec tunnels you will need to stop then start the service otherwise you will end up with excess logging. That shows as numerous bzip processes trying to rotate the logs as they fill. Apply the patch via the System Patches package and reboot. Steve

Are you actually seeing a problem other than that error? It may be just log noise. It's probably some hardware off-loading issue. Make sure everything is disabled (including hardware checksum) in Sys > Adv > Networking. But, yeah, swap out the Realtek NIC if you can. Steve

You can just choose the default (vt100) there. It's only for the installer anyway, it wouldn't affect the resulting install.

Yes. We run them in the Datacenters and generally they work fine. We had to change them for and HP version of the X540T2 instead for optimum stability and speed. They have a hard time running tagged VLANS at line speed using offload algorithms. That caused PSOD on ESXi hosts. So I have around 20 for sale if you need....

Congrats, 53.0C seems its working. @nollipfsense Indeed it is - happy to give my mini 5,1 a break from constant 60-70 degree temps! The question now is what to do with the stack of SFF M93p's I have laying around... Thanks again to the whole community for the support!

@magnus33 said in Running a dell r210 any need to upgrade?: Are their any future hardware requirements coming soon that would require a upgrade? Nope.

Yes, I would go with the 2100 given that WAN bandwidth. Steve

i225 (igc) is supported in 2.5.2 but there is a fix that missed that cut that's in 2.6. There are also some 700 series NICs that will link an N-baseT. The X710-T2 for example. I have not tested that personally but there are numerous reports here on the forum. Steve

@stephenw10 yeah

hi, i'm having in mind the same setup as yours, how's this going?

@stephenw10 It seemed like performance was less than what it is with the new driver. I didn't do any formal test, but subjectively, the newer driver seems to provide better performance.

Ah, yeah the fact aq0 exists is good. It may not support the auto-link detection for assigning, not all NICs do. Try running: ifconfig -vvvm aq0 That will show you what speed it's linked at and what it's reporting it's capable of. Steve

@stephenw10 Thank you very much for your response, I will keep this in mind, much appreciated.