• Permit ASN - proper setup?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    233 Views
    No one has replied
  • DNSBL keeps restarting

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    641 Views
    P
    @Raffi_ Good thought. It is an SG4860. All ports currently in use, but I can probably rejig things to try that. Just have to find the time.
  • [SOLVED] Under Interface "IF" and "Source" there is no info.

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    457 Views
    DaddyGoD
    @manjotsc You Welcome
  • GeoIP blocking problems - Need help, please!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    253 Views
    S
    It could be an error in the third party database being downloaded. Or, IPs "move" (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/windows-azures-use-of-non-us-ipv4-address-space-in-us-regions/). To allow an IP you need a firewall rule above it. What I often do is set up an Alias Native alias and then can use it in whatever NAT or firewall rule I want (which allows ordering). The files are downloaded and stored on disk by country code: [image: 1600357366931-e21f386f-a1f0-41b8-832f-08634edf26db-image.png] Remember to run an Update in pfBlocker after creating the entry, to generate the alias. As pfBlocker notes you can also default block all, and just allow the desired IPs or countries.
  • Advanced Domain/DNS Blocking Scenario

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    93 Views
    No one has replied
  • GeoIP: Wrong country-continent combinations are permitted?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    149 Views
    No one has replied
  • Some IPs are neither blocked nor permitted?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    97 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    160 Views
    J
    Resolution as follows: System -> Advanced -> Firewall & Nat -> Firewall Maximum Table - bump up the figure (I'm set to 1,000,000). System -> Advanced -> System Tunables. If there is an entry called "net.pf.request_maxcount", change the number to match above. If an entry doesn't exist, create one.
  • Possible bug with automatic IPv6 rules

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    120 Views
    senseivitaS
    Nevermind…it's already fixed in the devel version. [image: 1599735708328-screen-shot-2020-09-10-at-05.00.24.png] sarrieee
  • Single Host being blocked by pFBlockerNG

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    193 Views
    J
    I'm curious on how you determined that pfBlockerNG is the root cause of the issue? If I were troubleshooting, I would create a firewall rule: Source = 192.168.25.14:* Destination = *:53 Enable logging and move it to the top of the rules for that interface and see what it captures.
  • will pfblocker block junkmail in emails from websites

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    449 Views
    C
    @JeGr ok thanks ya i made sure malewarebytes was upto date and microsoft antivirus scanner.. its just weird i ordered on amazon then i got 30 min later saying ym order was on hold and you need to check your credit card and of course email address isnt from amazon or if it is an amazon email the link you click on isnt amazon.. so its getting more trouble some these days.. but ok i figured id ask if it was possible.. keep doing what i doing n make sure its spam or not myself.. thank you for your help (:
  • PFBlockerNG and the reboot/no Internet problem

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    I wanted to update on the resolution to this problem I had. I didn't want to post a problem and leave it the way this thread went. It turned out that pfblockerng-devel was my problem. Even though it was disabled both in the general tab and dnsbl, when I uninstalled the package, performance went to normal internet speeds. I tested and verified performance before anything was touched, and after I uninstalled it. I put the older version on and it did not affect my performance. I enabled what I wanted and was still good. I'm not sure why this was the issue, but all appears to be good now.
  • PfblockerNG-devel SafeSearch Redirection

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    743 Views
    ?
    I ran into the same thing. After look around it appears the IP might have changed. There is a reddit thread about it I found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/comments/inat95/new_ip_address_for_safeduckduckgocom_old_ip/ September 5th is about when it broke for my setup, which lines up with the IP change
  • issue with ad.doubleclick.net / NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    Hi, i mean it is normal, then you click the "Anzeige" and behind this "Anzeige" is a https redirect to Ads Server System "ad.doubleclick.net" and pfblockerng broken this Link and you see this "Error Messages". To open this Link behind the "Anzeige" you must have add this "ad.WHATEVER" to DNSBL Whitelist in pfblockerng. i think you must clean the browser cache and try it again. i use always the Update / Reload DNSBL function too. but, what says your firewall / pfblocker logfiles in the same moment when you try it to open this link? BR
  • What do your firewall rules look like?

    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    3k Views
    billlB
    @ex1580 @johnpoz Thank you both!
  • pfBlockerNG vs pfBlockerNG-devel

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    18k Views
    I
    Excellent. Thank you so much for the quick response and reassurances.
  • SSL Errors

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    579 Views
    ?
    @johnpoz John, I have to go. Thanks again for your help. I'll check back later in the day.
  • DNSBL Whitelist

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    191 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfBlockerNG suppresion list, where to find?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    654 Views
    H
    Getting stranger, they are blocked again. According to the rule it should be suppressed but clearly it was blocked. I now manually added the ips to the alias and did a "update - reload -all) and now it is working again. ===[ Suppression Stats ]=================================== List Pre Suppress Master ----------------------------------------------------------- BinaryDefence_IPs_v4 1445 1445 67583 Suppression ET_Block_IP_Ranges_v4: 1.1.1.0/24 (Excluding: 1.1.1.1/32) ET_Block_IP_Ranges_v4 995 994 67837 ET_Compromised_IPs_v4 450 450 67837 ISC_1000_30_v4 451 450 67836 So the alias "pfBlockerNGSuppress" was apparently the right place to add them, only when I added it from the reports it did not show up there and was not working again a little later
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.