• Correct pfBlockerNG Set Up?

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    2k Views
    GertjanG

    Added to that, "names" = host names exists for humans.
    DNS exists sot that all these names are converted to IP's, something that device actually can use.
    You could throw away all host names.

    Try visiting https://[2610:160:11:18::199]/ or https://208.123.73.199/ - your browser will yell at you because the cert of that web site doesn't have 2610:160:11:18::199 or 208.123.73.199 in it's ALT DNS list, so for the sake of testing, just override the warning, accepts it, and you'll see ...... this forum. Without using names (URLs).

    Edit : when you see these browser certificate warniong, inspect the cert. drill down to the cert info list, and you will find :

    219e97a7-a3fe-4b91-8519-73eccf73fa58-image.png

    so you know that you are connected to netgate.com or any sub domain of that site - forum.netgate.com in this example.

    @WannabeMKII : when you call someone, do you enter his name, or his phone number ?
    => Well, you use your contact list, a sort of DNS lookup, to have the phone select the according phone number. The phone circuit isn't aware of 'names'. Just numbers. Setting up a contact list without phone numbers ... that's .... not useful.

  • This problem is driving me nuts! Please help.

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    916 Views
    jimpJ

    "Cannot allocate memory" on 2.4.5 does not mean you don't have enough table entries. On 2.4.5 that error will be "Too many elements" if you need to increase the table entries limit.

    "Cannot allocate memory" is likely just what it says, it ran out of kernel memory trying to load the table. Usually this is only temporary and will resolve itself in the next filter reload. See https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/10310 for more info.

  • mobile.pipe.aria.microsoft.com

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    327 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfBlocker doesn't create any rule or alias

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    S

    The Force option Update will download the IP lists and create the aliases. If you're getting an error with the update, then it probably didn't create the aliases. In other words it has no information to work with. I've not run into an error there, let alone mentioning an ISO.

    Generally when I've created them I use Alias Native and then create my own firewall rules.

  • pfBlocker genrates 12GBs of logs a day

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    475 Views
    T

    Alright... I'll give that a try next.

    Had to resort to a cron tab that did a:
    /bin/cat /dev/null > /var/log/pfblockerng/dnsbl_error.log

    every 15 minutes. That's a hack!

    Will try the dev version next...

    Thx,
    Bob

  • pfBlockerNG logs

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    BBcan177B

    @siam yes

  • Can not check my email, outlook.live.com Cert Error

    17
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    1k Views
    S

    @RonpfS
    I just did a test. You need to "Force Reload" and "Force Reload DNSBL" in case If you remove an entity from custom white list. The entity behavior will change to blocking. You don't need to restart pfsense.

    Thanks for clarification.

  • Trying to run pfBlockerNG-devel update automatically after reboot

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    191 Views
    provelsP

    Just bumping this in case someone has a thought on it. I've also tried running this script as a shellcmd, but w/o success.

    #!/bin/sh sleep 120 /usr/local/bin/php /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.php update >> /var/log/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.log exit
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    P

    Thank you for that information. I will downgrade now pfSense. Would you @getcom mind to set up a bug-report? Your reputation is surely better than mine and i expect you can describe the problem better i could ever do.

  • Two routers and DNSBL behavior

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    123 Views
    S

    Well, i guess this is the answer. The second router DNS has to be pointed to Pfsense DNS resolver address.

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    118 Views
    No one has replied
  • On hunt for blocklists

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    K

    @durianbusuk

    Thanks for this! Didn’t know about it and am trying it out now.

  • Confusion with PFblockerNG rules and my own and system rules

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    zenn bijiZ

    @lordofpc734 Oh nvm. i just had to rename the rules (changed pfB_ to pfb_) this was in some infoblock in the IPv4 page

  • pfBlockerNG v. 2.1.4_22 - no floating rules have been created

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    162 Views
    No one has replied
  • GeoIP and Auto Rules

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    362 Views
    Bob.DigB

    @provels When you enable these you have the option of doing so. You can allow or block or use them as aliases.

  • PFblocker errors

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    573 Views
    ?

    @FMRC_Cheeky No worries. Don't be afraid to ask questions. You'll get up to speed faster than you may think!

  • pfBlockerNG - why is Luxembourg IP in pfB_NAmerica_v4?

    26
    0 Votes
    26 Posts
    2k Views
    Bob.DigB

    I had to "recreate" my geo-IP alias for that, because I was not able to combine the existing one with the custom IP. But it works!
    👍

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    111 Views
    No one has replied
  • hide known ip's from alert

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    88 Views
    No one has replied
  • Hoping someone can help allow AWS ranges only

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    107 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.