Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    J
    @qupfer What did I bang my head over this strange 502 issue. Your solution did it! Thank you so much, even 2.5 years later!
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    M
    Hi, I had a problem with my home network today, so I checked pfsense and discovered that suricata had blocked the wan ip. After some tests and triggering some suricata alerts, the wan ip was blocked. I restarted pfsense and ran some more tests, but the problem no longer occurred. I then checked the wan interface settings and indeed the ip list does not include the wan ip, both now that it's working and before, when it was blocked. I'm using pfsense 2.8.0 and suricata 7.0.8_2. I use PPPoE to access the Internet.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    fireodoF
    @tinfoilmatt said in Failed or invalid Mime Type: [application/SIMH-tape-data|0]: (ASN data is IPinfo, not Maxmind) Thats correct but "GeoLite2-Country" is from Maxmind ... (that confused me) I'm considering simply adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list to test. Thats what i tought too ... I'll try when I have the time for it ... Edit: I can confirm - adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list at line 257 in /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc did the trick - no more error! Edit: OK, problem resolved but I would like to know, whats the cause for that error! (SIMH-tape-data sounds like a "blast from the past" ...) Thanks a lot!
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    GertjanG
    @jimp Done. I was on acme.sh 1.0 (25.07.1) and a downgrade was proposed. Now, the issue is gone.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    602 Posts
    S
    Hi guys, Just $0.01, because I faced same issue on pfSense+ 24.07.1 upgrade, but I think root cause may NOT be pfSense+ per se. To my understanding (which may be wrong): Tailscale uses 2 keys: node auth key - by default expires after 180 days. We do not see it, but you can disable its expiration and we normally do that, right? So node registration should not expire after 180 days and re-authentication should not be necessary. preauth key - it is valid for maximum 90 days and you input it to VPN / Tailscale / Authentication as Pre-authentication Key (eg. tskey-auth-123456789011CNTRL-2pz1kCcaSjJucckK7U5Xbz123456a890). Remember that this key is valid for no longer than 90 days. So usually when you upgrade pfSense+ (=> Tailscale upgrade) this key is well expired. Device can not (re)authenticate using it - it is expired: - not logged in, last login error=invalid key: API key does not exist (because key that pfSense+ tried to use is expired!) Tailscale says that device may sometimes require re-authentication. Here is info from Tailscale KB: Auth keys Auth keys are available for all plans. Pre-authentication keys (called auth keys) let you register new nodes without needing to sign in using a web browser. This is most useful when spinning up containers, IoT devices, or using infrastructure-as-code systems like Terraform. An auth key authenticates a device as the user who generated the key. That is, if Alice generates an auth key, and uses it to add a server to her tailnet, then that device is authenticated with Alice's identity. Think of it as logging into a device. However, if you use tags with an auth key, after a device logs in as the user who generated the auth key, the device assumes the identity of the auth key's tags. As an alternative to directly creating auth keys, consider using an OAuth client. You can use an OAuth client and the Tailscale API to programmatically create auth keys. Types of auth keys Auth keys can either be: One-off, for one-time use. They can only be used to connect a device or server one time. This is meant for situations where you can't authenticate on the device yourself, so using a key is more practical. For example, a cloud server might use a one-off key to connect. Reusable, for multiple uses. They can be used to connect multiple devices. For example, multiple instances of an on-premises database might use a reusable key to connect. Be very careful with reusable keys! These can be very dangerous if stolen. They're best kept in a key vault product specially designed for the purpose. Key expiry An auth key automatically expires after the number of days you specified when you generated the key. You can choose the number of days, between 1 and 90 inclusive, for the key expiry. If you don't specify an expiry time, the auth key will expire after the maximum of 90 days. If you want to continue using an auth key after it expires, you need to generate a new key. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device by using the Machines page of the admin console and by using the Update device key method in the Tailscale API. If an auth key expires, any device authorized by it remains authorized until its node key expires. Each device generates a node key when you log in to Tailscale and uses it to identify itself to the tailnet. By default, node keys automatically expire every 180 days. You can change the default node key expiry from the Key Expiry section of the Device management page of the admin console. Learn more about key management. You can use tags as "service accounts" and have some devices NOT bound to any specific user (removal of user removes devices he own). You can define 1 or multiple tag owners (users managing tag). Tag vs. user authentication Tags are parallel to user authentication. They serve the same role as a user account, except they're intended for service-based devices, such as a web server or an app connector. As a result, it's impossible for a user account identity and a tag identity to exist on the same device. Applying a tag to a device previously authenticated with a user account removes the user account. Similarly, authenticating a device with a user account removes all tags from the device. Because tags are intended for non-user devices, they have qualities and limitations that make them unsuitable for authenticating end-user devices, such as a MacBook or a mobile device. For example, devices with a tag-based identity cannot use SSH to connect to a device with a user-based identity. Key expiry When you apply a tag to a device for the first time and authenticate it, the tagged device's key expiry is disabled by default. If you re-authenticate a device tagged before March 10, 2022, its expiry will be disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device from the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or the Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device from the Machines page of the admin console or by using the Tailscale API. Key expiry for tagged devices Key expiry for tagged devices is disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device through the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. That is, if it is enabled, it stays enabled; and if it is disabled, it stays disabled. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can find recently revoked or expired keys on the Keys page of the admin console. Best practices Depending on what devices you're authenticating, consider using an auth key that is: Ephemeral, for authenticating ephemeral nodes as part of short-lived workloads. Because node keys do not persist when a workload restarts, they reconnect as a different node. Tailscale automatically removes inactive nodes. For example, containers or Lambda functions should use an ephemeral key to connect. Pre-approved, for servers. If your tailnet has device approval enabled, this lets you add a device to your tailnet without further authorization. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a pre-approved auth key to connect in a network with device approval. Pre-signed, for nodes whose auth keys are signed locally on a signing node, which applies to tailnets with Tailnet Lock enabled. You can make an auth key (created by any means) pre-signed only by using the tailscale lock sign CLI command. Tagged, for servers. You can automatically apply a tag to a device by including the tag in the auth key. Access control policies restricting the device's permissions based on the tag apply after provisioning the device. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a tagged auth key to connect. I am personally going to try Tagged (preauth) key and all my pfSense+ exit nodes (3) are already tagged as "router". So I will remove nodes from tailnet and re-add with Tagged key providing "router" tag. I read that Tailscale on software upgrade MAY (rarely) REQUIRE device reauthentication. Having in mind that normal preauth keys expire after 90 days you should provide valid (non-expired) preauth key before pfSense+ upgrade? Eventually maybe if routers are tagged and preauth key is tagged then there will be no problem? Currently pfSense+ does not ask us about expiration date of Preauth Key, so it can not remind us that key is expired and it may lead to problems. When valid key is needed (reauthentication) then device will fail with the message we see. I would not blame pfSense+ yet, because I think Tailscale may require device reauthorisation sometimes and message you got tells you are trying to use expired key for authentication thus process is failing. I agree reauthentications should be rare or non-needed, but we may not know everything here.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    696 Topics
    4k Posts
    Q
    Hi Team, I’m running pfSense Plus 25.07.1 with TorGuard WireGuard VPN as my primary tunnel for LAN traffic (for best possible speeds). The tunnel is mostly working now, but I had to go through several fixes and I’m still not confident the configuration is stable. Here’s what I’ve run into: TorGuard support originally helped set up the WireGuard client. It worked fine for about a day, but then the Unbound DNS Resolver stopped working. Even when I re-enabled Unbound manually, LAN clients still couldn’t reach the internet. The main issue seemed to be when switching between WAN (ISP public IP) and the VPN IP. Sometimes traffic didn’t switch over properly, and at one point pfSense even generated a crash report during the switch and restarted. To fix it, I reset the LAN firewall rule so that LAN traffic would route through the VPN gateway when active, and fall back to WAN when the VPN was down. After that, I was able to toggle the VPN on/off without pfSense crashing, and traffic correctly switched between ISP IP and VPN IP. At this point it works, but I don’t think the setup is completely stable. I’d like to ask for guidance on: How to make sure Unbound stays reliable when the VPN gateway goes up/down. Best practices for LAN firewall rules so clients use the VPN when it’s up, and either fall back to WAN or get blocked (kill switch) when the VPN is down. Correctly assigning DNS servers to WAN and VPN gateways. At the moment, in System → General Setup, I don’t see the gateway dropdown next to DNS entries, so my DNS servers are just “floating” with no interface binding. If anyone has suggestions, or can point me to a clean reference configuration for WireGuard + Unbound + proper DNS gateway assignment, I’d greatly appreciate it. I'd really like to have a conference with someone and go over this. I'd like to give them access using RustDesk or TeamViewer so we can talk and they can show me things. I am legally blind so I am one inch from the screen. I've also uploaded the crashdump so you can look over it. I've also been using AI, but I keep going in circles with it, so it's not perfect. Thanks in advance! Warm Regards, Jamestextdump.tar.0
  • [Resolved] Avahi stops working after a few minutes

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    Were there any unusual entries from Avahi in your system log when it would stop working? I've switched my media center to use a pulseaudio tunnel rather than zeroconf for now, but this is still an issue I would like to resolve.
  • BUG

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    776 Views
    C
    You have some part of the mod_security package apparently, which no longer exists. Look in /usr/local/pkg and delete anything that's related to it.
  • Bind view+sync bug

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    733 Views
    H
    PS.  The namedb files in /cf/named/etc/namedb/slave/LAN and …/WAN are the same, and match those under /LAN on the master.  The  ..../WAN db on the master is correct.
  • RRD / Email Report Graphs

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    836 Views
    No one has replied
  • Remove references to missing packages

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    988 Views
    K
    +1 ! Do we have something like apt-get autoclean … autoremove... ?
  • What is a good Anti Virus?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    847 Views
    J
    I find edge antivirus practically useless, unless you are a shop that does SSL MitM tear apart - then it can still be useful.
  • Packages not working after restore

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    589 Views
    No one has replied
  • PHP script to create OTRS abuse tickets by snort alerts triggered

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    619 Views
    No one has replied
  • How to accomplish Single Sign-on with pfSense

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    7k Views
    MikeV7896M
    Radius and LDAP are simply mechanisms that pfSense can use to verify a username/password are correct. They don't handle SSO in that you only log in once, then automatically log into other sites/services. SSO solutions these days usually use SAML, where you have some kind of web-based interface that a site or service can request a token from, the SAML system verifies the username/password (making you enter it if you haven't logged in yet), then sends the token back to the original site/service indicating the user is valid. Or something like that goes on. pfSense doesn't have any kind of SAML or SSO authentication options. I'm not sure if they're on the map for the future either. Personally, SSO on a device that is protecting your network… not a good idea. That's just my opinion though.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    887 Views
    No one has replied
  • Varnish 3 and pfsense 2.3

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    811 Views
    No one has replied
  • FreeRadius2 Package Install Stalls

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Hi Guys i Managed to make it work and wrote a guide for this : https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113228.msg629777#msg629777
  • FreeRadius

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Hi Guys i Managed to make it work and wrote a guide for this : https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113228.msg629777#msg629777
  • Avahi stopping after VPN IP Change

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    K
    The avahi shutdown seems to kill the dbus daemon as well which is required for avahi to run. It then fails to start the dbus daemon before attemping to start the avahi daemon again. I would say that restarting of the dbus daemon is unnecessary because it doesn't listen on IP addresses/interfaces and could be left running.
  • Newby question re whitelisting in pfblockerng

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    RonpfSR
    @pfBlockNG: Enable Suppression This will prevent Selected IPs from being blocked. Only for IPv4 lists (/32 and /24). Country blocking lists cannot be suppressed. This will also remove any RFC1918 addresses from all lists. Alerts can be suppressed using the '+' icon in the Alerts tab and IPs added to the 'pfBlockerNGSuppress' alias A blocked IP in a CIDR other than /32 or /24 will need a 'Whitelist alias' w/ list action: 'Permit Outbound' Firewall rule Do not use the pfBlockerNGSuppress Alias in a Firewall Rule. This alias is used during the cron download process only.
  • ClamAV HTTPS scanning

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    8k Views
    N
    Yes, this is a possible way. Or you can add entries like these: shExpMatch(host, "10...") || shExpMatch(host, "192.168..*")
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    538 Views
    No one has replied
  • Freeradius won't start after PF 2.3 update

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    5k Views
    B
    I have the same problem, radius showing in services as stopped and I cant start it from the gui. I have done this: rm /tmp/radiusd_start.lock which did not make any difference, and this: radiusd -f -d /usr/local/etc/raddb which gives me this: [2.3.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.skh]/root: radiusd -f -d /usr/local/etc/raddb gdbm fatal: Unexpected end of file Has anyone any further suggestions?
  • Packages and CARP

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    993 Views
    A
    Thank you :) Kind regards
  • WPA2 Enterprise with EAP-TLS auth issue with freeradius2 1.7.3_1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    943 Views
    N
    Hi, found this on the web: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.unix.freeradius-users/AxI-ebtSqDI No, the only thing that check_cert_cn does is make sure that the CN in the certificate matches the User-Name attribute in the RADIUS request. It's basically just a sanity/security check on the request itself.  It does not go looking on other autz sources for you.  It is up to you to decide elsewhere (users file, SQL DB, LDAP) whether or not to allow that user to authenticate.  If you do nothing, the user will be allowed to authenticate by default.  If, for some reason, you decide you don't want a user to be allowed to authenticate, you must specifically reject him. So if you want to block a certificate you need a CRL (Certificate Revocation List) and put the certificate in it.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.