Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    A
    I have been experiencing this issue for a while now, so it is nice to know the cause! I updated the redmine and posted screenshots of the issue. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15274
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    S
    @bmeeks :( well thank you for your time, sir. 🫡
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    K
    @pulsartiger The database name is vnstat.db and its location is under /var/db/vnstat. With "Backup Files/Dir" we are able to do backup or also with a cron.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    R
    @Gertjan s7.vonderste.in resolves to 94.16.122.152. I just saw a dns request for that. In the whitelist on OTX Alienvault there is a timeserver: 3.de.pool.ntp.org I just don't know why a timeserver runs on a TOR node and seems to be hosted by a private person. Maybe pfblocker resolves it incorrectly becaues the time server is hosted on the same IP? Anyway I see this coming from my ASUS router which is in Access Point mode. These weird domains always come up every hour and I think they are related to ntp on that ASUS router. Since I disconnected it it has stopped. Here is an example of what I see. Scanning these IPs shows nothing malicious but who knows. 93.122.215.85.in-addr.arpa,192.168.1.8,sonne.floppy.org,unk 94.244.38.46.in-addr.arpa,192.168.1.8,basilisk.mybb.de What didn't stop was on my work computer these weird replies as mentioned above. reply,A,NSEC,1081,domaincontroller-gPHvwjYS.local,192.168.1.86,NXDOMAIN,unk But it only happend once today instead of multiple times like the days before. @Gertjan said in pfBlockerNG not logging anything by default?: Where - what log - did you find that URL (DNS only deals with host names) ? I find them in pfblockerNG dns_reply log under Logs EDIT: I just realized that it is kind of in the name pool.ntp.org its made up of multiple sources so it does make sense that it resolves some of these weird private hosts?
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    493 Topics
    3k Posts
    GertjanG
    @EChondo What's your pfSense version ? The instructions are shown here : [image: 1753262126227-1acdc586-cb29-4148-9e36-81ade4e5e60c-image.png] A restart of a service will start by re creating their config files. If a certificate changed, it will get included. When the process starts, it will use the new certificate. @EChondo said in Issue with ACME Certificates Refresh & Restarting HAProxy: I haven't been able to confirm if the above works(mine just renewed, don't feel like doing it again just to test), so we'll see in 60 days I guess. No need to wait x days. You can re test / renew right away, as you are 'allowed' to renew a couple (5 max ?) of times per week.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    594 Posts
    E
    @totalimpact Tailscale 1.54.0 is 2+ years out of date. Tailscale has made quite a number of changes since Tailscale 1.54.0, likely rendering it incompatible with their servers. I would consider manually updating the Tailscale FreeBSD package. FreshPorts does not maintain an archive of all the releases, only the latest compiled by the volunteer maintainers. The key to manually upgrading is knowing which FreeBSD version your pfSense release is running, i.e. 14 or 15. You can following along here.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    692 Topics
    4k Posts
    M
    This is still an issue as of 2.8.0 / 25.07, and it drives me crazy. Gateway failure works as expected, the wireguard tunnels will fail over to the backup gateway and continue on as normal, but will never recover once the failed gateway comes back online. While a reboot will (usually) fix it, I usually just go into my routing settings and mark the secondary gateway as down, forcing it to revert back to the primary... the users tend to dislike it when I reboot the firewall in the middle of the day
  • No upgrade icons

    Moved
    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    Z
    @bmeeks OK ... I understand
  • Nmap package

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Hmm, looks like that was changed here: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/commit/7f64c9db1a0f5c0ffc18afe7a9f7a9b9f82f9c67 Not sure how you ended up with both though.
  • Issue with Pfsense plus 22.05

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @justplayinn Have not yet upgraded. Have you tried removing and reinstalling the packages? There is no "downgrade" path. To accomplish that you'll need to reinstall and restore your config file from backup.
  • Latest Cron update prevents special strings like @reboot

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @jimp https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13309
  • iPerf3 not working in GUI

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    @steveits Less for benchmarking and more for stressing. I want the CPU cycles included in that test. I can run iperf from desktop to server over the vpn, but this I want to see if HIS internet is to blame. I have a number of clients all on Verizon FIOS all claiming their clouds are slow. Verizon is very fractured right now and they lack people who can understand what you are talking about in the support space.
  • HAproxy authelia

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    U
    Got it working like a week ago after a while not thinking about it. For future reference I have created a manual. It was quite hard to find out the what and how. But it can be done from gui. https://dkict.com/pfsense-haproxy-authelia/ Pfsense haproxy + authelia
  • 2 Votes
    1 Posts
    4k Views
    No one has replied
  • Arpwatch - update-ethercodes cronjob necessary?

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    708 Views
    No one has replied
  • Wireguard and Netgate SG-1100

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @scourtney2000 But if you're telling the ping which source to use and it works.... sounds like a route issue. Can you post pics of your configs, gateways and routes?
  • pfSense acting as SMTP Relay via port 25

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    4k Views
    johnpozJ
    @flat4 you don't sign up for it - you set it up.. https://github.com/Tautulli/Tautulli/wiki/Notification-Agents-Guide#email You will notice the gmail instructions call out using app password Then you setup which of your users get the "newsletter" I use BCC instead of CC so that users don't see all the others users email addresses.
  • LCDproc

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    914 Views
    abliznoA
    @eddy2020 its a bug, you can fix it by manually changing the config file https://forum.netgate.com/topic/150856/lcdproc-on-watchguard-xtm-5-series-with-pfsense-2-4-4/25?_=1655488887623
  • SSL certificate subject doesn't match host repo01.atx.netgate.com

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    JonathanLeeJ
    @steveits this has been resolved in the background it is working again.
  • Packages unavailable and Upgrades failing when using IPv6

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    546 Views
    No one has replied
  • node_exporter for ARM

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    @bdossantos said in node_exporter for ARM: node_exporter Hello, anyone would like to use node_exporter on their arm negate ? :/
  • Snort alert only on priority 1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    bmeeksB
    @hehob60672 said in Snort alert only on priority 1: Is there any way to make Snort generate alerts only for rules with priority 1? No, unfortunately the PRIORITY field is not an option for alert suppression/thresholding. If the only rules you want to even inspect traffic are those marked as PRIORITY 1, then you could perhaps use the pattern matching features on the SID MGMT tab to select only rules matching that criteria to enable.
  • squid proxy and squid guard

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    590 Views
    No one has replied
  • iperf: write failed: Broken pipe

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    T
    @johnpoz yeah, leave it up. I made the assumption they wouldn't have two similarly named packages/apt would correct me.
  • MailReport suppress headers

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    663 Views
    No one has replied
  • LCDproc not displaying IPSEC

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    508 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    stephenw10S
    It's built into the FreeBSD package system. It would be silly for us not to carry that across.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.