Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    JonathanLeeJ
    @bmeeks your work outclasses so many individuals and developers. Your stuff is amazing. Cheers
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    M
    Same issue on 25.07.1 pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.7 Database Sanity check [ FAILED ] ** These two counts should match! ** ------------ Masterfile Count [ 26379 ] Deny folder Count [ 26378 ]
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    702 Topics
    4k Posts
    P
    Yes
  • Squid 3.4?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    842 Views
    No one has replied
  • Squid 3.3.10 error

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?action=post;quote=398495;topic=43687.270 @serialdie: Under –- System ----- User Manager Add the user clamav. Worked for me.
  • Voip server in ALIX

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    628 Views
    No one has replied
  • Need to update file on http://files.pfsense.org (vnstat2 php front end)

    27
    0 Votes
    27 Posts
    7k Views
    A
    woo hoo! thanks!
  • Unable to communicate to the pfsense package server

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    B
    Did you have it set to GW on your LAN? Or Like was your interface setup?
  • Tftp not working (clean install of pfsense)

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    After further review of older threads I noticed that tftpd was listening on 127.0.0.1  I added an internal UDP portforward to 69 and everything works now.
  • Unable to Use Dansguard

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Test this in a logical, step-by-step fashion so that you can tell what is broken before adding the redirect rule… 1.) Validate that Squid and Dans are both running... If so... 2.) Try connecting the browser (via explicit proxy settings) to squid and make sure you can get out... If so... 3.) Try connecting the browser (via explicit proxy settings) to dans and make sure you can get out... If so... 4.) Add the redirect rule and delete your browser proxy settings.
  • Possible Squid Issue with Streaming

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    So, I disabled HAVP and everything works perfectly. I had to reboot the pfSense system after I did because I was getting bandwidth errors. Is there a way that I can just install a virus scanner on the box? I'm using Squid 2.7.9 pkg v.4.3.3
  • Unbound and android 4.1

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    @doktornotor: @bryan.paradis: https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/revisions/9399370b367df7b73b84d605f4f44599c93b0bbe/diff https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3015 That fix clearly did not work (presumably due to the fact is is failing to check anything but the first and second DNS entries in System - General Setup.) It is related to the same problem but it is a fix for DNS zones. I have updated your bug report with the related information.
  • Unbound package - enable forwarding still no-op

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    Thanks a lot for quick fix!
  • Squid User's speed is very low!!!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    640 Views
    No one has replied
  • How to make sites exempt from HAVP?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    689 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfBlocker whitelist?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    5k Views
    BBcan177B
    @digdug3: This works, but then you also have to open all the ports you have configured to this whitelist. If the IP was not blocked at all it would behave "normally" to the next rules. Hi digdug3, The order of the rules in the Firewall tab are important. Block first and than Pass next. If you are having a specific issue, post the issue and maybe someone might be able to help.
  • Squid Pfsense 2.1 and multi wan

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    Just a friendly reply. I do not have the same configuration. I have one WAN and two OPTs hoping to get a reverse proxy working. It's not working, but there may be an additional contributing factor that I don't know what I'm doing and the instructions are severely lacking.
  • Unable to install vnstat2

    26
    0 Votes
    26 Posts
    6k Views
    N
    very well thank you!!! :)
  • Can't Access NTOP

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    R
    You are welcome :)
  • Pfsense, alias and subdomains needed

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    7k Views
    P
    according to the proxy config, you can use a man-in-the-middle approach. It requires that you setup a WPAD/PAC in DNS or DHCP. This is new to me, but reading up on it looks promising. I am using my proxy only as a way to control site my girls should not be seeing. They can get to https sites though. This might be a way to circumvent that limitation. Please post if you have any success, if you use it.
  • Squid+squidGuard: web pages are timing out, they load after refreshing

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Dansguardian installation problem - amd64

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    890 Views
    J
    Hi Guys i had the same problem installing dansGuardian yesterday too…. there was a typo in the dansguardian.inc file when first installing at line 1201  ----->    @unlink($script)) should read               @unlink($script); it has been fixed today.....
  • Snort whitelist by command line

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    4k Views
    bmeeksB
    @jandohrmann: Hi Bill, Brilliant solution - thank you! Best Regard Jan By the way, I plan to add this new IP Reputation Preprocessor option to the next Snort update (should be in the 2.9.6.0 package when it comes out in about a month). Bill
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.