• AWS Load Balancers and AWS

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    284 Views
    J
    @joshuamichaelsanders said in AWS Load Balancers and AWS: ancers with pfSense? Can anyone step me toward a b BUMP. Curious if anyone has used ELB, either classic or the new model, with pfSense.
  • Help with Routing

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    670 Views
    V
    The PC2 will not be connected to the OpenVPN interface! The outbound NAT rule has to be on the interface where PC2 is connected to.
  • COnnected routes are not being advertised via ospfd

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    I dont think it is because of bug as we found no issue in Backup firewall. there must be some malfunction happened while changing the IP of WAN interface... Still searching for the root cause...
  • Rules complementing static routes

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    467 Views
    stephenw10S
    Give us an example of traffic that you are trying to pass here, actual source and destination IPs. It seems likely that the traffic is not hitting the outer firewall at all. Alternatively the target may not be using that as route back if the source is a public address. Run packet captures. See what traffic is actually arriving on which interfaces. Steve
  • Adding second WAN interface what will happen with the VPN?

    vpn
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    601 Views
    stephenw10S
    Yes, nothing will change unless you change it. For example: https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/book/openvpn/openvpn-and-multi-wan.html Steve
  • Statefull Failover

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    360 Views
    stephenw10S
    Not without a client side program to manage that. The existing firewall state(s) will be via the WAN that went down so that needs to timeout and be re-established on the the WAN. Steve
  • Webmail session problem with Load Balancing/Failover

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    350 Views
    E
    You have no idea how thankful I am. This works for me perfectly (https://forum.netgate.com/topic/131412/solved-alternative-to-sticky-connection-option/2) Thanks.
  • Using Cisco L3 switch with pfSense - static route needed?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    G
    Ahh, okay. So one static route in the pfSense: 192.168.0.0/17 via 192.168.120.2 Thanks so much for your help dotdash!
  • pfSense Routing

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    503 Views
    N
    Thanks for that. I will cross post this in VPN. These are all IPSec site to site connections.
  • routing and openvpn

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    279 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    241 Views
    A
    You need: to add this second IP as IP Alias (Firewall/Virtual IPs) to add Outbound NAT rule for this VLAN ("for traffic originating from only one of my VLANS") like Source: this VLAN net Destination: Any Translation Address: this Virtual IP https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/book/nat/outbound-nat.html?highlight=outbound%20nat
  • /28 subnet on DMZ

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Thanks for the support given so far. At seems as though I was to early. A couple of hours after Hetzner said they made the change in routing it started working. So now everything works as it should.
  • Quick question about multiple public subnets on SG-5100

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    myriadM
    @johnpoz I like to NAT, so I will use VIP.
  • Routing traffic for a specific IP and port from OPT net through WAN

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    485 Views
    S
    Really dumb. I had a default gateway set on the interface, and the default gateway was the other router. Fixed now.
  • WAN DHCP, pfsense don't take new IP

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    833 Views
    W
    I found why. My mobile operator don't send public IP to their client. A NAT is used between a public IP and the terminal. So, modem retreive a private IP from this NAT operator. Thank anyway Derelict.
  • Routing in 3 local lan

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    1k Views
    johnpozJ
    Here is how you would do what your talking about.. [image: 1540978852944-howdone-resized.png] Route in pfsense left would be 172.16/12 go to 192.168.0.2 Route in pfsense right would be 172.16/12 go to 192.168.0.6 These are transit networks that connect to your mpls network which would route to your different locations. Clients in each location would only talk to pfsense as their gateway.. In the example 172.21.1.254 and 172.21.2.254 These are all different networks that could have 254 devices.. If you have more than that then you could increase the mask to /23 or even /22 - or create different vlans in each location.. As long as your different locations do not use overlapping networks..
  • path MTU discovery problem

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    468 Views
    No one has replied
  • Route VM to a specified range of IPs only

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    177 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiwan: LoadBalance/FailOver in the same box is possible?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    445 Views
    GrimsonG
    https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/book/multiwan/index.html
  • Route a network to pfSense which available on a VM

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    773 Views
    B
    @netblues It works perfectly. Thanks a ton!!
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.