Firefox 1.5.0.9 on Linux shows the graphs fine.

I updated the machine with the newest snapshot. It's fixed.  I can now ping the gateway from WAN interface on the console.  The RRD quality graph is now displaying normal results.  Thanks again for the great work!

I have just reinstalled with latest snapshot. It works !! Thank you for your help ;)

Hmmm, sounds logical :-) sorry… should have come to that clue myself...  ;)

Thanks, Hoba.

Theme is present in the latest snapshots from the snapshotserver now, even on the 1.x codetree. Have fun.

2G, i think that it should be enough. there is no time for upgrade now, the whole network depends on this machine.

:'( Thanks you two

AAh, OK, thanks once again hoba

For future reference. It worked. thx /gbosco

:oops: Well that was embarrassing! Thanks Hoba, I set it the other day and completely forgot to add pfsense as non proxied

This page needs serious optimization. It's really slow. It works. But is really slow. I think we are doing some really weird processing here.

No, the theme that is closest to m0n0wall is "pfsense".

Awesome.  Stickying topic since this may affect others down the road.

pfSense requires at least 128 megabytes of ram.  If you have at least this amount of ram then I suspect something in your hardware.

We are in the early alpha stages of the version that will have this feature so it's too early to say anything about a releasedate.

Never seen that on 1.0.1. You using the full install or embedded? Also did you get any errors during install. You said it took a few tries to get it to boot, which makes it seem like something is hosed.

Either vpn in or have a look at http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=41&artlang=en&highlight=webgui%20wan

@gbelanger: Of course, I was still working on it - thats why i didnt send it to you guys. It's an adaptation of the metallic theme. Its a bit smaller in image size and has a more 'corporate' look, maybe we can call it that .. corporate? =P Thanks for the response on APC, I'm sure this will make a difference. Are you referring to www.xcache.com's xcache? This seems rather expensive? -G Nope, http://trac.lighttpd.net/xcache/ –Bill