• Simple QOS help for a noob

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Scheduling different limiter speeds each day?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ

    This can only be done properly on 2.1, where each limiter can have multiple bandwidth entries and you select the schedules there in the limiter config.

  • Traffic Shaping Issue 2.0.2

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    S

    Here are the screenshots for you:















  • Does a basic shaper config actually do anything?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    P

    It should balance the load when full, since all traffic will have equal priority.

  • Works! Limiting multiple LAN users, thru single external proxy

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Shaper wizard: it set higher speed than specified?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    Boy that is weird. The ISP says we are 23 * 1000 * 1000 or 23,000,000.

    So apparently I gotta convert from 1000 to 1024 for the shaper wizard?

    23,000,000 / 1024 = 22460.9375

    I paste that in:

    And the resulting config is different.

    What's going on here?

  • High priority queues showing drops

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ

    @ttblum:

    I see.

    What I put into the Wizard's 'Connection upload speed' shows up afterwards in the WAN 'Bandwidth' field.

    Is it possible I have upstream and downstream mixed up?

    Shaping happens outbound on an interface. Uploads go out WAN. So it's correct.

  • Confused over Bandwidth and linkshare

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    Hi.
    I will listen here as I would like to know to.

    I do not know what the bandwith is for. I would like to know to. Both with and with out limits in the service curve

    Regarding the link share I guess it is the quaranteed bandwith share if the connection is congested. If there is free capacity then more traffic can be given to the queue. To avoid a queue to use all your bandwith you can add an "upperlimit" along with your linkshare. Say 5% linkshare and 15% upperlimit. Then the queue will have minimum 5% when line is congested and a max of 15% even if there is a lot of free capacity.

    Why you do math I do not understand. 3x10% What are you trying to ask? I you have a queue with 50% and a subqueue with 50% the last will get 50% of 50% = 25% of the bandwith. But I guess that is not your question.

  • Only one default queue per interface is allowed

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    Thanks. That works for me too.

  • Traffic shape different subnets

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    N

    Yes, you have to define the traffic shaping like that.

    Regarding the rules, what I am currently doing is to specify on tab LAN (for download shaping) and on tab "Floating" (for upload shaping).
    But, I think I read somewhere that it may be sufficient to only specify them on the "Floating" tab (you then set "Direction" to "any").
    I haven't tested that.

    Maybe someone else can confirm that.

  • Floating rules, quick, queue

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    N

    OK. Thanks a lot for your reply.

  • Control speed for "File Extension" (flv, mp4, …)

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ

    It can be done in squid+squidGuard, I believe. It's been asked and answered many times on the forum. Search and you'll find better answers.

  • How can i set a bandwidth per interface

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    N

    Have you tried limiters?

  • Help in limiting certain IP's

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    N

    Hi,

    I haven't used limiters, but maybe you could do it as follows:

    1. Create a firewall rule for the IP range to exclude as follows:
    Pass
    Source: $ALIAS_EXCLUDED_IPs
    Destination: any
    In/Out: None

    2. Create a second firewall rule for the remaining IP range as follows:
    Pass
    Source: $ALIAS_OTHER_IPs
    Destination: any
    In/Out: UploadLimiter/DownloadLimiter

    I'm not 100% sure, but do tell me if this works.

  • How to shape Amazon S3

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    5k Views
    S

    Thanks, I will retry asap.

    EDIT:

    did a cross check while I was using another ALIX with ipfire on it … there the backup went through fine and much quicker.
    I don't have a clue what to look for in the iptables there ...

    Just as a reference.
    I will re-check things when I plugged in the pfsense-box again.

  • Traffic shaping advice - multi-lan

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Cap users if they exceed defined data limit.

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    N

    In theory this would be possible with freeradius2 package and captive portal.
    I say "in theory" because there is still some bug on accounting on CP.

    You should at least use pfsense 2.1.

    Search the forum for more information or take a look here:
    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/FreeRADIUS_2.x_package

  • Limit band for each ip in the lan: it's possible?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    Hi

    You should create two limiters and set one for mask destination (download to LAN) and one for mask source (upload from LAN).

    Then add a FW rule above your default rule on the LAN and add the limiters to this.
    IN = upload from LAN (with source mask)
    OUT = download to LAN (with destination mask)

    This way all clients will get there own sets of limiters

    You can read it in the link from ptt under "Dynamic queue creation"

  • Upload traffic going into download queue or vice-versa

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Enabling limiter kills pfsense traffic

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    T

    No sorry. Icannot reproduce it.
    It sounds like a bug of some kind. I have spend all weekend trying out different things with the limiter. Creating and deleting limiters over and over and I have had no problem doing that.

    Limiteres first really come to use after beeing assigned to a firewall rule. Therefore it is even more weird that your box messes up just after a limiter has been created.

    Suggestion:
    Time to do a restore to factory defaults and try again?

    Good luck with your project.
    Anders

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.