Hello. I have no extra packages installed. Just a normal install to let it work like a router. The log files I have to check. I have also installed smoothwall as test and it doesn't have much troubles with speed test.net

Can you pls. then remove the following kernel modeuls in the open vm tools package: vmmemctl.ko vmxnet.ko vmblock.ko vmhgfs.ko These files have a version mismatch on the console running Vsphere 4.1, 5.0, 5.5.

yes 2.1.5 with e1000 is faster on esxi … its odd because 2.2 series have this multithreaded pf and all. i'm thinking there are serious performance tweaks to be made to get more out of it .... but i wouldn't know how/where to start looking for tweaks. it would be cool if the devs would put some stuff on the wiki to get more performance out of esxi

Not the answer i was hoping for, because this is Xen as part of unraid i will need to wait until the next release of unraid. It's working on 2.1.4 of pFsense so i will stay with that until this is sorted. Thanks for the feedback.

@johnpoz: The easy way not to confuse the interfaces is just look at the mac for the nic in esxi.. I just set them so I know what they are ;) [2.2.1-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: ifconfig | grep ether         ether 00:50:56:00:00:01         ether 00:50:56:00:00:02         ether 00:50:56:00:00:03         ether 00:50:56:00:00:04 So when I go to assign interfaces in pfsense its very clear what is what.. Now I guess if someone had the same idea and was running vmware and set that same 0001 address on their wan mac I might have some problems getting an IP from my isp..  But hasn't happened so far..  And if does just change it, etc. You just gave me a easy solution to a problem I was making difficult. Thanks as always :)

SOLVED!!!!! thanks CMB!!! (have 4 nics total on board, all intel i354- and I kept 1 for esxi mgt functions.) (VMX3 works too- I also manually matched physical MACs w. NICs in PF vm options- I don't know if that works better… or what) (the 100 speed is just my old switch- I wasn't sure if the new switch was bad or not.) (will put my other VMs on the LAN vswitch2) Enclosed are a couple pics (stock, wrong, and working)- so if others have this issue.... they can see how to fix.      

Don't do it that way.  For your (bridged) WAN, use an IP on your private network like 192.168.2.1.  Then you for your Intnet1 LAN and Intnet2 DMZ (if you need a DMZ), use 10.0.0.0/24 and 172.16.1.0/24

Did some testing and those are my findings for Virtio NICs on VirtulBox: 2x Virtio (checksum offload disabled): Transfer: 6mb/s, guest CPU 100% NIC1 + 70% NIC2 Host CPU usage: ~60-70% 2x e1000: Transfer: 6mb/s  guest CPU 60% NIC1 + 60% NIC2 Host CPU usage: ~50-55% Transfer: 10mb/s  guest CPU 85% NIC1 + 75% NIC2 Host CPU usage: ~63%

That's exactly how I did it too.

Great. Thanks a lot.

@Moohouse: Have you tried disabling APM and/or ACPI for the VM, to see if this locates your problem? Hi Thanks for answer. If I do that I'm getting a panic. But I don't think the problem is ACPI because I've already seen same setup working. I have another pfsense on the same host which is working. The only difference I see is the bad one is on a "sata" bus and the working one on a "virtio" bus. Thanks

Sorry for the late reply! I do appreciate the replies posted thus far and it appears (on the surface) that it will be straightforward providing I assign the 2 Wan and 1 Lan physical ports correctly to the VM and such.

Jeah, that worked, thank you!

Yeah saw that, thanks turning off the txcsum and rxcsum seems to fix the problem..

@johnpoz: And what card to you have exactly? http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00EKQN2KK/?tag=pcpapi-20 And what is your N router? http://www.linksys.com/en-eu/products/routers/WRT160NL Most cards are 2x2 streams at best.  Do you have AC clients?  If not that card having AC gets you nothing.  Where did you get the card, someone gave it to you for free? My Dad's office motherboard died. Because AC pc cards are not all that cheap.  Never in my life seen a dual band card that would allow you to have both 2.4 and 5ghz up a the same time, etc. This is exactly why Im doing this. To Learn. I did not know this You do understand 5ghz N and AC is only 5 is lot less coverage than a 2.4..  So sticking some little card in a box you have in the corner is not going to give you much coverage. I told you. My house is not large and my home office is centrally located on the second floor. I am all for experimenting..  Please do fire up pfsense its a great product, and I love running mine on esxi.. But wanting to use it as an AP is just not something you should be toying with to be honest, not when you could pick up a dual band N access point for pennies. Why exactly should I not toy with it? What will it hurt? Im going to be honest with you here. After have my idea being called "beyond stupid" and this post here, I feel Im being attacked for asking a question and wanting to try something. I know I can't read tone and body language through text so I could be taking this wrong but I dont think so. If your going to want to play on improving your network - trying to stick some pc card into your host and use it a AP is just not the right road to go down..  That is my personal and professional opinion, take it or leave it.

If you're still seeing "Dec  5 08:39:49 pfSense kernel: (ada0:ata1:0:1:0): Error 5, Retries exhausted", you're having a different issue of some sort. Any issue you're having on 2.2.1 at this point is completely different from #4445, that's definitely completely fixed in 2.2.1. Those disk error logs could potentially cause similar symptoms if they're still occurring.