• Send_gmail_after_startup.sh always runs twice

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    C

    Update - not a fix to the actual problem, but a workaround:

    installed the package "Shellcmd". renamed the script without the ".sh" extension. added this into "Shellcmd: settings" : /usr/local/etc/rc.d/send_gmail_after_startup

    Now it only runs once as required.

    same goes for any other custom scripts needed to run once at startup.

    Hope that helps anyone else experiencing the same problem.

  • HAVP Pros and Cons

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    841 Views
    No one has replied
  • Squidguard https not working

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Is this message a type or is this a bug?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    No, this message is not in the right place. This shows up after saving the interface with new subnet and it's waiting APPLY. But before this APPLY is press DHCP range should be changed or else one locks out.

  • Set LAN IP via DHCP

    Locked
    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    10k Views
    jimpJ

    There isn't, but it's on the to-do list.

  • Page not open

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    809 Views
    No one has replied
  • Crash on pfSense 2.0.2

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    624 Views
    No one has replied
  • Session Expired Issue(account logout)

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    926 Views
    stephenw10S

    You can add a policy route to make sure traffic for your email server always goes via one WAN.

    Add a new firewall rule on your LAN. Put the rule above your existing rule that allows traffic out so that it catches your mail traffic.

    Protocol: TCP
    Source: LANnet
    Destination: Your mail server IP (or an alias containing a range of IPs)
    Gateway: WAN1 gateway (this is a an advanced setting).

    Like you have said most email servers don't have a problem with mulitwan these days. Gmail hotmail etc, no problems.

    Steve

    Edit: You have already asked this question twice. Both times I advised you to use a policy route.  ???

  • Connection to Dropbox

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    T

    I assume it was a cert error with OpenDNS.  Although they say that's how it should work, I've had to drop their service for anything vert-related because it just doesn't work.

  • Upgraded to 2.0.3 Uploaded config from another machine Problems

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    A

    I did  and rebooted  things sort of started to work.
    I had to disable Cp for now.
    I'm trying to use freeradius2 with mac auth on a lan with 20 clients.
    It's a small wisp. All the clients have a wireless radio , some have the router in the radio enabled some radios are bridged and they use their own router.
    Seems I'm having issues with witch device's mac address is actually sent in the packets to the Pfsense box.

  • Boot menu timeout… adjustable?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    johnpozJ

    I do the same thing, never worried about it too much - its only a few seconds.  But I keep meaning to try this out since this is a few seconds delay as well

    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Remove_F1_Boot_Prompt

    Maybe your interested in that as well?

  • PfSense can ping all but one specific IP address in range

    Locked
    40
    0 Votes
    40 Posts
    12k Views
    stephenw10S

    Damn! I looked at your screen shot earlier and failed to spot that.  :-[

    Yes, that's certainly your problem. The sandboxed VM cannot possibly respond to any requests from the pfSense machine because it will just send any traffic to the proxy internal interface instead.

    I see why it is done like that, you can bring up a test VM with the production config.
    The answer here is to change the proxy internal interface IP. That will mean you have to manually configure the VM gateway as you say but it will resolve the problem.

    Steve

  • Modem to Router to Pfsense Set Up

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S

    You can leave one router in bridge mode so that one of your pfSense WAN interfaces will have a public IP. Makes it easier for port forwarding, UPNP etc later on.

    Steve

  • New to pfsense

    Locked
    26
    0 Votes
    26 Posts
    6k Views
    M

    Steve - I cleared state and no change :(

    After I cleared state and tried again, I looked in state to see what it says for that port.  I am attaching that.

    Do we have any other recommendations??? :(

    Thanks

    Example_State.png
    Example_State.png_thumb

  • Connect pfsense wan to tomatousb lan

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    G

    Turns out to be a flaky nic. All is good with pfsense 2.0.3 connected. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.

  • Thanks to Devs

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    721 Views
    No one has replied
  • VoIP state issues

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    884 Views
    No one has replied
  • Update on number of pfSense known live installs ?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    C

    Now that April is over in the web server's timezone (which is the calendar month we use), the count for April is 167,697 known live installs. Over the past few months it's grown by between 3000-5000 installs per month. April up about 4900 from March. March up 4990 from February. That's unique public IPs that have pulled the bogons file using 'fetch' (so it doesn't count bots crawling it, people downloading it in a browser, etc.).

    At current rates, we'll exceed 200,000 known live installs before the end of 2013.

  • Attempting to port forward with an OpenVPN client [SOLVED]

    Locked
    28
    0 Votes
    28 Posts
    19k Views
    chpalmerC

    The actual interface is the VPN so the rule applies there.

    Even though its a WAN connection the VPN passes through it and is therefore encrypted.

  • MOVED: Squid ssl_crtd crashing

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    896 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.