• Anyone using pfSense with telMAX ISP (Canada)?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    833 Views
    JKnottJ
    @guardian said in Anyone using pfSense with telMAX ISP (Canada)?: I don't trust my ability to secure it. Not much different than IPv4. You start out with everything blocked and only allow what you want. In fact, you can configure many rules to apply to both IPv4 & IPv6. Here's an example: [image: 1755915116010-9101928c-dd2d-4e58-abe2-d4a68923083d-image.png] The first rule blocks pings and the second allows other ICMP.
  • 4 ports mini PC recommendations

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    chudakC
    Anybody is using Protectli Vault V1410-4 Port ?
  • mDNS or Multicast Traffice Not Passing Between Multiple Vlans

    23
    0 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    Yeah, just to prove it out I ran a simple test. Since I don't have anything I can easily use that advertises mDNS I just turned on Publishing in Avahi itself on 4 firewalls: steve@steve-NUC9i9QNX:~$ mdns-scan + 4860 [00:08:a2:xx.xx.xx]._workstation._tcp.local + 4860._ssh._tcp.local + 4860._sftp-ssh._tcp.local + fw1 [00:08:a2:xx.xx.xx]._workstation._tcp.local + fw1._ssh._tcp.local + fw1._sftp-ssh._tcp.local + pfsense [00:01:21:xx.xx.xx]._workstation._tcp.local + pfsense._sftp-ssh._tcp.local + pfsense._ssh._tcp.local + 1100-3 [f0:ad:4e:xx.xx.xx]._workstation._tcp.local + 1100-3._sftp-ssh._tcp.local + 1100-3._ssh._tcp.local In that result 4860 is in the same subnet as the client I'm testing from. fw1 is the router on that subnet. pfsense and 1100-3 are other firewalls in different subnets connected to fw1. You can see the scan tool is able to see all of them no problem.
  • Going from PFsense 24.03 to 25.07

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    642 Views
    H
    @stephenw10 Thanks
  • pfSense Avahi Not Broadcasting mDNS/Bonjour Services Across VLANs

    Locked
    3
    11
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    765 Views
    stephenw10S
    Duplicate post.
  • sshd CVE-2024-6387 vulnerability

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    5k Views
    stephenw10S
    2.8.0 has the patched code: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/2abea9df01655633aabbb9bf3204c90722001202
  • OVH Virtual IP not working

    2
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    628 Views
    M
    Got it working. I needed to add a virtual MAC in OVH [image: 1755849994302-7f78b61e-b920-4844-9aec-a984ec259bd5-image.png]
  • Unable to log into WebUI after 25.07 upgrade

    11
    1
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    569 Views
    M
    @stephenw10 Ended up doing a reinstall. Netgate installer is pretty sweet. First time using it and absolutely no issues at all. Impressive. Also restoring from ACB was a bit nerve racking as I couldn’t find my key but it all worked out in the end. Seamless to get back online to be honest I really don’t know why people have hang up’s over the installer..it just works
  • https://acb.netgate.com failure

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    808 Views
    stephenw10S
    Usually those are seen when there is some temporary interruption in the connection. Like the WAN is down at boot for example.
  • limit bandwidth for certain users

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    196 Views
    stephenw10S
    Yup, that. Combine it with static DHCP leases to get a fixed list of IPs to limit.
  • Poor performance over IPsec but not Internet

    16
    3
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    4k Views
    M
    @stephenw10 said in Poor performance over IPsec but not Internet: In the Phase 1 advanced options settings set 'NAT Traversal' to Force to test ESP specific throttling. Only one end needs to set that. I know I'm necroing a 3+ year old thread, but holy crap this was exactly what I needed here. My main office is on a 500/500 fiber connection, and we have a remote office on coaxial cable running 500/10, and over the VPN I could barely get 20 Mbps, but over the internet I could get the full 500 Mbps. I tried setting the 'NAT Traversal' to 'Force' on our main office, and forced an IPSEC reconnection and now I'm getting about 480ish Mbps over the VPN (internet is around 511 Mbps). THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU Again, sorry about the thread necroing :(
  • LCDdProc seems to be broken on 25.07.1-RELEASE

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S
    Ok let's continue there then. It's definitely not working as intended.
  • Massive 10x Performance Regression in AES-GCM

    8
    1
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @Antibiotic Hi apparently the issue I mention here supposed to be only a cosmetic bug due to a change in the code for performing AES-GCM (and other AHEAD cipher) speed tests, that rely on OpenSSL routines. The change change came in, in between OpenSSL 3.0.15 and 3.0.16. So there are most-likely other reasons for your speed regression. I suggest reading the URLs I linked to further up and digging a bit further into those.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied
  • Square LED flashing green

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    740 Views
    stephenw10S
    Is that consistent across a full power cycle? The LEDs should only ever normally show flashing green during an upgrade. So with pfSense booted. Do that still show the normal power up sequence? Initially no LEDs should be lit. Then after a few seconds the green-circle LED flashes blue.
  • 0 Votes
    26 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    @stephenw10 Yeah, that was kind of my thinking too. I'll stick with it for now despite the (seemingly) high error rate (0.1% if it could be believed). Do let me know if anyone has any ideas for trying to hone in on the cause of these 'errors'.
  • Regaining Access to pfSense?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    913 Views
    M
    @stephenw10 That's a handy command, good to know
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    837 Views
    stephenw10S
    Yup, use python mode.
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S
    Hmm, that doesn't look good. I assume you have tried a full power cycle? But on the 4200 you can fit in NVMe SSD to install to: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/netgate-4200/m-2-nvme-installation.html
  • IGMP for IPTV

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    677 Views
    stephenw10S
    I can't be if you're not using IGMP proxy in 23.01 as you said. Is that not actually the case?
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.