It works fine if you create them for users in the user manager. Not sure what you did, if you upgraded from a 1.2.x release, they won't magically appear there as they weren't in your original config. You can manually import them.

WINS in general was abandoned long ago, it's just widely misperceived that it helps with Windows network browsing cross-subnet.

There isn't unless you assigned the bridge interface. With the default sysctl settings, putting rules on the bridge won't do anything.

check to see if you have scrub rules or your MRRU/MRU settings are wrong.
Also try disable tcpmss fix from that MLLP bundle.

The packages hook into the privilege system quite a bit differently than normal pages. I'm not sure if any packages have user permissions right now. I think there is support in the code for them, but I'm not sure any of the packages have actually been updated to take advantage of it.

You might want to run gitsync on both systems and try the current code checked into the repo. If that still removes the aliases on the slave, update the ticket with that information.

Not in the way you describe, at least not that I'm aware of. Someone else who knows squid's config better than I do would have to answer that.

I spoke too soon. Not only did this continue to be an issue on nanobsd/net5501, but I changed hardware and software version and it continues to be a problem.

I'm now running 2.0-BETA4  (i386)
built on Thu Oct 14 01:16:12 EDT 2010
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1

on a SM X7SPA-H (Atom D510, 4GB) and seeing the exact same symptoms: mbuf usage increases steadily until uptime reaches approx 7 days, then total hard lockup.

I have block private networks turned off on all interfaces since I'm using a private 10.0.0.0 network along side a public class C network on the inside and also from our University connection we get 10.100.0.0 network connections from their wireless coming in from the outside.

Since my backup box is down I went to carp settings and shutoff Synchronization and also added a floating rule to reject carp protocol and not log on all interfaces coming in or out. My logs are showing tremendously less vrrp traffic but I am still getting a few every few seconds now. I have 2 interfaces on the inside. One is assigned a 10.0.0.0 network address and the other is assigned a public class C network address. The vrrp Logs coming in are from each other. On my 10 interface it's source is from my public IP on the same box and vice versa.

Yes we definitely need to see that racoon.conf, there isn't enough info in your post to tell what didn't convert properly, please send it to Jim.

Nah just a commit that made the builder stop. A fix was checked in but the builder didn't get restarted. It's going again now.

The rules only direct traffic into the limiter pipe. It could be one rule or 50 rules but the limiter only sees the IP, not the connections (that's what the mask does)

If you do not run pfsync it should be able to.
Otherwise pfsync is not compatible between the 2.

Just to do a little update on this thread for others.

This now work for Ubuntu 10.10.

Something I just had remembered, if you have a keyboard plugged in, it might cause some ambiguity in where the boot choice menu is displayed. If no keyboard is found, it should definitely be printing to the serial port.

Should be fixed on latest versions.
Mostly disable the cronjob it is not needed anymore.

i made 3 gateway groups

named :

load balancing   wan1  tier1    wan2  tier1

failover1           wan1  tier3    wan2  tier4

failover2           wan1  tier6    wan2  tier5

and added that as rule to the firewall

lan  all to all  gateway load balancing
lan  all to all  failover1
lan  all to all  failover2

is that a correct way to do it ?

load balancing works

but dont know how to make it switch to failover.
only the first rule works, so if i put fallover as first rule it works , if i put load balancing as first rule it works

also tryed

lan  all to all  gateway load balancing
wan1  all to all  failover1
wan2  all to all  failover2

greetings franco

As I'm not sure that I understand your setup correctly, I can describe how I use virtualbox.

ISP –- Ubuntu desktop --- pfSense virtualbox ---- Ubuntu desktop virtualbox

pfSense virtualbox
1 nic setup with nat
1 nic setup with the internal name intnet

Ubuntu desktop virtualbox
1 nic setup with the internal name intnet

Thanx a lot!!