• 2.2 Upgrade on Firebox - Kernel panic during package installation

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    The only person in the world! Cool. My mother always told me I was special ;) Yes, it's running a 533 Mhz FSB Pentium M. I'll try to replace it with the stock processor in a couple of weeks, and do a fresh install. I'm about to move, most of my stuff is already packed and for now it's easier to just run the Firebox for a while without Radius. I think I'll have to stick with WPA2-PSK for a little while  :-X Thanks for your input!
  • Update to 2.2 new SSH NAT not working.

    28
    0 Votes
    28 Posts
    3k Views
    R
    Looks like I will take another workstation toss in a couple quality NICs and create another test FW.  If .36 fails to receive traffic it's ISP problem for sure.  Thanks all for the help/info.
  • 0 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    K
    Confirmed I reinstall a clean 2.1.5 and did basic config edit the boot file /boot/loader.conf to add the line hw.ata.atapi_dma="0" created a new one /boot/loader.conf.local and put the line hw.ata.atapi_dma="0" Upgrade from the internet to 2.2 and next boot with new version was done without problems. Thx guys !!!
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    jimp, mystery solved.  Bottom-line: The pfSense release 2.2 ufslabels.sh script fails to set $DEV properly The ufslabels.sh f76cbd6 or later in git contains the fix Manually labelling the swap partition will silently fail if you don't disable swap first (swapoff) Thanks for all your help.  In hindsight, I should have simply run the latest ufslabels.sh per your suggestion instead of simply inspecting the difference on github. Best, Bruce Here are the supporting diag/debug details. Command-logging of 2.2 ufslabels.sh script (the grep regular expression fails to return the swap device entry) + [ y = y ] + echo 'Disabling swap to apply label' Disabling swap to apply label + /sbin/swapoff /dev/ada0s1b + echo 'Applying label to swap parition' Applying label to swap parition + SWAPNUM=0 + find_fs_device /dev/ada0s1b + unset DEV + /usr/bin/grep -e '[[:blank:]]/dev/ada0s1b[[:blank:]]' /etc/fstab + awk '{print $1;}' + DEV='' + DEV='' + [ '' != '' ] + echo 'Activating new fstab' Activating new fstab + /bin/mv -f /etc/fstab /etc/fstab.old + /bin/mv -f /etc/fstab.tmp /etc/fstab + echo 'Re-enabling swap' Re-enabling swap + /sbin/swapon -a Command-logging of post-2.2 ufslabels.sh script (the grep regular expression properly returns the swap device). + echo 'Applying label to swap partition' Applying label to swap partition + SWAPNUM=0 + find_fs_device /dev/ada0s1b + unset DEV + /usr/bin/grep -e '[[:blank:]]*/dev/ada0s1b[[:blank:]]' /etc/fstab + awk '{print $1}' + DEV=/dev/ada0s1b + DEV=ada0s1b + [ ada0s1b != '' ] + SWAPDEV=ada0s1b + [ -n ada0s1b ] + echo 'Disabling swap ada0s1b to apply label' Disabling swap ada0s1b to apply label + /sbin/swapoff /dev/ada0s1b swapoff: /dev/ada0s1b: Invalid argument + /sbin/glabel label swap0 /dev/ada0s1b + SWAPNUM=1 + echo 'Activating new fstab' Activating new fstab + /bin/mv -f /etc/fstab /etc/fstab.old + /bin/mv -f /etc/fstab.tmp /etc/fstab + echo 'Re-enabling swap' Re-enabling swap + /sbin/swapon -a ```****
  • 2.2 - Restore config unable to ping/reach router

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    432 Views
    No one has replied
  • Unit goes offline/drops interfaces

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    596 Views
    No one has replied
  • New Install of 2.2 Missing System-> Packages

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    @stephenw10: There's no package manager if you're running the live-cd by mistake.  ;) …  ;D ;D ;D
  • 32-bit 2.2 webConfigurator hangs

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    755 Views
    D
    I'm not suggesting your should wait for anything. What I'm suggesting is that when you plop 64bit on the same inadequate HW there's absolutely not gonna be any improvement regarding performance. Saying that 32-bit pfSense 2.2 on 1GB RAM is unuseable is a non sequitur.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    433 Views
    P
    LAN and WAN are in the same 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. That does not work. When plugging a system into an upstream private network for testing or whatever, make sure to first change the LAN IP/subnet to some private address space that does NOT overlap with what the WAN DHCP is about to receive.
  • Md5 and 256 checksum failure for latest amd64 version

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    969 Views
    M
    Ok, its ok now. it was a download problem.
  • Can't seem to get up and running

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S
    @hayedid: Sure, triple NAT may not be a perfect plan, but shouldn't it work? It should, theoretically. Some services have a hard time with multiple layers of NAT but most stuff works fine. The fact that yours didn't implies one of your devices was doing something wrong almost certainly the Asus since switching that to AP mode fixed it. Handing out the wrong gateway, incorrect subnet mask, bad route, it could be many things. Running it in access point mode is much better though. @hayedid: I really need to be able to see and login to my modem and router.  If they are in bridge mode, I lose that ability. You can still access the Asus in access point mode. Often you can still access an upstream router in 'modem' or bridge mode by using an additional IP on the WAN. See: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Accessing_modem_from_inside_firewall @hayedid: Incidentally, I did turn 'Block Private Networks' off since my modem is not setup in bridge mode.  Does this open me up to any additional hacking? No. Everything from WAN is blocked by default anyway. That settings only serves as an additional block if you have a public IP on WAN. You should never see private IPs on the WAN in that situation so anything that arrives from a private address must be bogus and should be rejected even if you have port forwards set up. Steve
  • Upgrade to 2.2 breaks Squid reverse proxy

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    R
    Check this out https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=87280.0
  • 2.2 Watchdog Timeout

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    826 Views
    stephenw10S
    Yeah, at the very least tell use what NICs you have so we can point you at some appropriate tweaks. Steve
  • Quick question about switching versions x86 -> x64

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    T
    @stephenw10: Good call. Be aware that you can easily make a mistake hand editing the file though.  ;) Trying to restore a complete config file that references packages onto an install that doesn't can have interesting results. I've tried that and it resolved itself OK but there were worrying looking errors. Whilst you can choose to restore individual areas on the config file there's no option to restore everything except packages. So you can restore each area individually but that's not a good idea if the config file version doesn't match the install. You can load the packages you had before. You can edit out the packages section. You can make a backup of the config file without the packages section but that requires some forethought! Steve Actually I didn't notice the checkbox for backing up without package information. That will work perfectly. Plus I can do two, one with and one without and see if there's anything specific I'd want to save.
  • PFSense on edgerouter POE

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    pttP
    NO, as Steve pointed, only x86 HW is currently supported
  • Installation Troubles.. NICs?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    After resetting the BIOS to the default settings twice, I got PFSense to boot correctly. Tomorrow I will go back into the BIOS and disable the non-essentials and hope for the same results. Thanks everyone for helping me out with this. Hopefully I won't run into any more issues.
  • Lanner FW-7525 2.2 Upgrade Failed (from 2.1.5)

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    K
    Yep - Thats a pretty normal fix.
  • Installation problems on APU

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    696 Views
    No one has replied
  • Pfsense 2.2 no re2 interface on APU1d4

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    You might also want to check the pcengines forum. I seem to recall I have seen some issues with missing smd coil on one of the interfaces, rendering it non-functional. If you need that port, and the bios update recommended by Steve does not help, you might have to claim warranty… edit: found the topic again : http://www.pcengines.info/forums/?page=post&id=7DA1FA61-80A9-427E-BE14-0196B18F82AD&fid=DF5ACB70-99C4-4C61-AFA6-4C0E0DB05B2A
  • Custom package libkvm.so.5 missing error

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S
    Ah right. Yep definitely build it against FreeBSD 10.1 or at least take the binaries from a 10.1 package. Steve
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.