I have no idea whos causing this traffic....

DaddyGo

@johnpoz said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

just diagnostic menu packet capture

Sorry, I was thinking about Wireshark (it was missed), plus what was described above.
Personally, I like it better as packet capture in pfsense tool

+++edit:
much more configurable and detailed

johnpoz

You understand you can just download whatever the packet capture captures into wireshark right? Just click the download button ;) And then open it up with wireshark or whatever your fav tool is..

A pcap is a pcap ;) While true the gui interface doesn't really show you a lot of detail on the capture. but if all he is really interested is the IP causing the traffic and what port its talking to - the gui would provide that info for sure. You can also always up the level displayed - but yeah I pretty much always download the pcap into wireshark when want to analyze some sniff.

DaddyGo

@johnpoz said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

You understand you can just download whatever the packet capture captures into wireshark right?

I agree with you, I may just be used to clicking the Wireshark icon and the SPAN VLAN is connected anyway.
I handle multiple things on multiple networks and it’s that simple..

if don't need deep investigation the pfSense GUI is enough

JKnott

@DaddyGo said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

Sorry, I was thinking about Wireshark (it was missed), plus what was described above.
Personally, I like it better as packet capture in pfsense tool

I mentioned Packet Capture. I also prefer Wireshark, but it won't run on pfsense, so either you run it on a computer that can see the traffic or use Packet Capture and download to Wireshark. If you have a managed switch, you can set up port mirroring to watch the desired connection, at least on the LAN side.

Pippin

It's also possible to do remote capture.
Wireshark connects to pfSense over SSH in that case.

JKnott

@Pippin

I used to do that, when I had a Linux firewall. However, it's not possible to run it on pfsense, IIRC.

DaddyGo

@JKnott said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

I also prefer Wireshark, but it won't run on pfsense, so either you run it on a computer that can see the traffic or use Packet Capture

I agree with you too

so I wrote the L3 switch (above) + mirror port
(even on a smaller network, it’s worth just keeping one in your desktop drawer for testing)

we use SPAN VLAN on the Cisco network and we are testing here with Wireshark
(I got used to it and simple method)

I don't like TP-Link, but for a mobile test device it fits a lot (we use it :-)) TL-SG105E, it knows the port mirroring and thats all

johnpoz

My bet is someone streaming off plex ;) or something similar - there is another thread about graphs showing double - and the @Cool_Corona posted image looks exactly like how plex can stream data to a client..

Here is mine that I just used for image in that other thread.

While someone streaming off my plex, lower data rates is all - he prob has higher bitrate movies on his ;)

Here is plex showing the data

JKnott

@DaddyGo said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

(even on a smaller network, it’s worth just keeping one in your desktop drawer for testing)

See my post Creating a "data tap". I also use a TP-Link TL-SG105E switch. I carry it in my computer bag and have also used it as a plain switch on occasion. Since I use a port based VLAN on it, instead of tags, it works fine.

DaddyGo

@JKnott said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

I also use a TP-Link TL-SG105E switch

Well, then we think on the same way

marvosa

One crude option is watching the traffic graph live (Status -> Traffic Graph) and changing the interface to LAN. Depending on your network design, if you're not seeing any data, you may also have to change the filer to "Remote".

Another option is to install the ntopng package. In the ntopng settings menu, make sure that all of your LAN interfaces are tagged. Once in the ntopng webgui, click on the "Flows" menu across the top and you will see details (protocol, source, destination, throughput, etc) about each connection. From there I would sort by the "Actual Thpt" column so the connections generating the most bandwidth are at the top of the list.

Yet another option is installing the softflowd package and pointing it at a netflow collector like PRTG.

I would use ntopng. You should be able to find the offending device in a few min.

AKEGEC

I think I saw similar forum thread from Belgian op not long ago. I am not sure if he already found the solution.

Wireshark is a great tool but if I may suggest, use QRadar CE (FREE) to analyze your live Pfsense logs.

alt text

Like today, I found a lot offensive IP addresses.

johnpoz

@AKEGEC said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

QRadar CE

Thanks for the mention - I found something to play with this weekend ;)

But a SIEM is completely different animal than protocol analyzer like wireshark ;)

Normally your SIEM doesn't even accept flows, so you can't really see say your top talkers or who is talking to who, unless you logging allowed rules, etc.. And just seeing something was allowed doesn't show you how much data they are moving, etc.

But it does look interesting - so think will fire up the CE.. 50 events a second should be pretty reasonable.. for what your home setup would see.

bingo600

@JKnott

You can do remote tcpdump on pfSense , and ssh tunnel it to wireshark , using these steps.

Assumptions:
-----------------
pfSense vers : 2.4.5-p1
Username on both linux & pfSense : pfuser
Firewall hostname : pf-fw-01
Interface to sniff on : igb1.100

Install / Prepare Steps:
------------------------------
As admin on pfSense
install
pkg install security/sudo



As admin on pfSense  (syyshhh)
-------------------------------
1: visudo , add : %admins ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
2: vi /etc/groups , make sure your user is member of admins.

As root on local linux (Wireshark display machine)
---------------------------------------------------
3: ssh-keygen
4: ssh-copy-id pfuser@pf-fw-01

Use wireshark as frontend for pfSense tcpdump ... aka. Start a sniff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As root on local linux machine (to begin wireshark "remote" snif and tunnel data via ssh) - 'not port 22' (don't match ssh, used for tunneling data) 

ssh pfuser@pf-fw-01 sudo tcpdump -iigb1.100 -U -s0 -w - 'not port 22' | wireshark -k -i -

These are some notes I took like 2 years back , on 2.4-RC

I'm not sure if the "ssh keygen" steps (3-4) in the linux machine, makes sense to do as root. I might have done that as pfuser

But i just tried a remote wireshark , and it still works in 2.4.5-p1
if-name had to be changed from -iigb1_vlan100 to -iigb1.100

Edit:
Watch out .. This will load your ssh connection hard
Don't sniff a loaded 1Gb if , via a remote 20Mb ssh
Use a pfSense local pcap dump instead , or make a more specific tcp dump match on the pfSense
/Bingo

DaddyGo

@AKEGEC said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

Wireshark is a great tool but if I may suggest, use QRadar CE (FREE) to analyze your live Pfsense logs.

@AKEGEC - I haven't met this stuff yet, thanks

I agree with @johnpoz, but it seems like a really good little tool for logging for home setup.
This is not a protocol analyzer, currently Wireshark + Nmap I think meets the needs of every administrator.
I will mention, who might be interested in the theme,.... the new Nmap 7.91 and the big star Npcap 1.00 available. A good Npcap 1.00 was already needed.
https://seclists.org/nmap-announce/2020/0

In any case, it is much better than the PRTG, ........- mentioned by @marvosa, which as we know is free for only up to 100 sensors, nor is it a protocol analyzer.

We prefer this rather........:
https://securityonionsolutions.com/software
(for loging and static PCAP analysis)

johnpoz

I love these statements ;)

"QRadar that is low memory, low EPS"

But then

Minimum System Requirements:

    8 GB RAM (10 GB is recommended)
    250 GB free disk space
    2 CPU cores (6 cores is recommended)

Thought I might throw this up on my nas.. Not with those requirements..

DaddyGo

@johnpoz said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

"QRadar that is low memory, low EPS"

Yes, you need a separate power machine for the end - or we misunderstand the concept of low.
I can’t even download it yet, I want to play with it a bit.

BUT

IBM, did not say this when I provided my email address when registering

it's good to have a gmail address used for this purpose, hahahaha
for I would be in their net....

++edit:

what a junk attempt

AKEGEC

@johnpoz said in I have no idea whos causing this traffic....:

I love these statements ;)

"QRadar that is low memory, low EPS"

But then
Minimum System Requirements:

    8 GB RAM (10 GB is recommended)
    250 GB free disk space
    2 CPU cores (6 cores is recommended)
Thought I might throw this up on my nas.. Not with those requirements..

If you don't have a power server then you could use AWS or Azure to install your Qradar and send your pfsense log there. ;)

pacmac

@AKEGEC do you have a content extension that works with 7.3.3 CE version? I have installed the Netgate pfSense DSM but I am experiencing problems while installing Polo's pfSense content extension.