Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    J
    @qupfer What did I bang my head over this strange 502 issue. Your solution did it! Thank you so much, even 2.5 years later!
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    M
    Hi, I had a problem with my home network today, so I checked pfsense and discovered that suricata had blocked the wan ip. After some tests and triggering some suricata alerts, the wan ip was blocked. I restarted pfsense and ran some more tests, but the problem no longer occurred. I then checked the wan interface settings and indeed the ip list does not include the wan ip, both now that it's working and before, when it was blocked. I'm using pfsense 2.8.0 and suricata 7.0.8_2. I use PPPoE to access the Internet.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    fireodoF
    @tinfoilmatt said in Failed or invalid Mime Type: [application/SIMH-tape-data|0]: (ASN data is IPinfo, not Maxmind) Thats correct but "GeoLite2-Country" is from Maxmind ... (that confused me) I'm considering simply adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list to test. Thats what i tought too ... I'll try when I have the time for it ... Edit: I can confirm - adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list at line 257 in /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc did the trick - no more error! Edit: OK, problem resolved but I would like to know, whats the cause for that error! (SIMH-tape-data sounds like a "blast from the past" ...) Thanks a lot!
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    GertjanG
    @jimp Done. I was on acme.sh 1.0 (25.07.1) and a downgrade was proposed. Now, the issue is gone.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    602 Posts
    S
    Hi guys, Just $0.01, because I faced same issue on pfSense+ 24.07.1 upgrade, but I think root cause may NOT be pfSense+ per se. To my understanding (which may be wrong): Tailscale uses 2 keys: node auth key - by default expires after 180 days. We do not see it, but you can disable its expiration and we normally do that, right? So node registration should not expire after 180 days and re-authentication should not be necessary. preauth key - it is valid for maximum 90 days and you input it to VPN / Tailscale / Authentication as Pre-authentication Key (eg. tskey-auth-123456789011CNTRL-2pz1kCcaSjJucckK7U5Xbz123456a890). Remember that this key is valid for no longer than 90 days. So usually when you upgrade pfSense+ (=> Tailscale upgrade) this key is well expired. Device can not (re)authenticate using it - it is expired: - not logged in, last login error=invalid key: API key does not exist (because key that pfSense+ tried to use is expired!) Tailscale says that device may sometimes require re-authentication. Here is info from Tailscale KB: Auth keys Auth keys are available for all plans. Pre-authentication keys (called auth keys) let you register new nodes without needing to sign in using a web browser. This is most useful when spinning up containers, IoT devices, or using infrastructure-as-code systems like Terraform. An auth key authenticates a device as the user who generated the key. That is, if Alice generates an auth key, and uses it to add a server to her tailnet, then that device is authenticated with Alice's identity. Think of it as logging into a device. However, if you use tags with an auth key, after a device logs in as the user who generated the auth key, the device assumes the identity of the auth key's tags. As an alternative to directly creating auth keys, consider using an OAuth client. You can use an OAuth client and the Tailscale API to programmatically create auth keys. Types of auth keys Auth keys can either be: One-off, for one-time use. They can only be used to connect a device or server one time. This is meant for situations where you can't authenticate on the device yourself, so using a key is more practical. For example, a cloud server might use a one-off key to connect. Reusable, for multiple uses. They can be used to connect multiple devices. For example, multiple instances of an on-premises database might use a reusable key to connect. Be very careful with reusable keys! These can be very dangerous if stolen. They're best kept in a key vault product specially designed for the purpose. Key expiry An auth key automatically expires after the number of days you specified when you generated the key. You can choose the number of days, between 1 and 90 inclusive, for the key expiry. If you don't specify an expiry time, the auth key will expire after the maximum of 90 days. If you want to continue using an auth key after it expires, you need to generate a new key. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device by using the Machines page of the admin console and by using the Update device key method in the Tailscale API. If an auth key expires, any device authorized by it remains authorized until its node key expires. Each device generates a node key when you log in to Tailscale and uses it to identify itself to the tailnet. By default, node keys automatically expire every 180 days. You can change the default node key expiry from the Key Expiry section of the Device management page of the admin console. Learn more about key management. You can use tags as "service accounts" and have some devices NOT bound to any specific user (removal of user removes devices he own). You can define 1 or multiple tag owners (users managing tag). Tag vs. user authentication Tags are parallel to user authentication. They serve the same role as a user account, except they're intended for service-based devices, such as a web server or an app connector. As a result, it's impossible for a user account identity and a tag identity to exist on the same device. Applying a tag to a device previously authenticated with a user account removes the user account. Similarly, authenticating a device with a user account removes all tags from the device. Because tags are intended for non-user devices, they have qualities and limitations that make them unsuitable for authenticating end-user devices, such as a MacBook or a mobile device. For example, devices with a tag-based identity cannot use SSH to connect to a device with a user-based identity. Key expiry When you apply a tag to a device for the first time and authenticate it, the tagged device's key expiry is disabled by default. If you re-authenticate a device tagged before March 10, 2022, its expiry will be disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device from the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or the Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can enable or disable key expiry on a device from the Machines page of the admin console or by using the Tailscale API. Key expiry for tagged devices Key expiry for tagged devices is disabled by default. If you change the tags on the device through the admin console, Tailscale CLI, or Tailscale API, the device's key expiry will not change unless you re-authenticate. That is, if it is enabled, it stays enabled; and if it is disabled, it stays disabled. After you re-authenticate, the device's key expiry will be disabled. You can find recently revoked or expired keys on the Keys page of the admin console. Best practices Depending on what devices you're authenticating, consider using an auth key that is: Ephemeral, for authenticating ephemeral nodes as part of short-lived workloads. Because node keys do not persist when a workload restarts, they reconnect as a different node. Tailscale automatically removes inactive nodes. For example, containers or Lambda functions should use an ephemeral key to connect. Pre-approved, for servers. If your tailnet has device approval enabled, this lets you add a device to your tailnet without further authorization. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a pre-approved auth key to connect in a network with device approval. Pre-signed, for nodes whose auth keys are signed locally on a signing node, which applies to tailnets with Tailnet Lock enabled. You can make an auth key (created by any means) pre-signed only by using the tailscale lock sign CLI command. Tagged, for servers. You can automatically apply a tag to a device by including the tag in the auth key. Access control policies restricting the device's permissions based on the tag apply after provisioning the device. For example, shared devices, such as servers, should use a tagged auth key to connect. I am personally going to try Tagged (preauth) key and all my pfSense+ exit nodes (3) are already tagged as "router". So I will remove nodes from tailnet and re-add with Tagged key providing "router" tag. I read that Tailscale on software upgrade MAY (rarely) REQUIRE device reauthentication. Having in mind that normal preauth keys expire after 90 days you should provide valid (non-expired) preauth key before pfSense+ upgrade? Eventually maybe if routers are tagged and preauth key is tagged then there will be no problem? Currently pfSense+ does not ask us about expiration date of Preauth Key, so it can not remind us that key is expired and it may lead to problems. When valid key is needed (reauthentication) then device will fail with the message we see. I would not blame pfSense+ yet, because I think Tailscale may require device reauthorisation sometimes and message you got tells you are trying to use expired key for authentication thus process is failing. I agree reauthentications should be rare or non-needed, but we may not know everything here.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    696 Topics
    4k Posts
    Q
    Hi Team, I’m running pfSense Plus 25.07.1 with TorGuard WireGuard VPN as my primary tunnel for LAN traffic (for best possible speeds). The tunnel is mostly working now, but I had to go through several fixes and I’m still not confident the configuration is stable. Here’s what I’ve run into: TorGuard support originally helped set up the WireGuard client. It worked fine for about a day, but then the Unbound DNS Resolver stopped working. Even when I re-enabled Unbound manually, LAN clients still couldn’t reach the internet. The main issue seemed to be when switching between WAN (ISP public IP) and the VPN IP. Sometimes traffic didn’t switch over properly, and at one point pfSense even generated a crash report during the switch and restarted. To fix it, I reset the LAN firewall rule so that LAN traffic would route through the VPN gateway when active, and fall back to WAN when the VPN was down. After that, I was able to toggle the VPN on/off without pfSense crashing, and traffic correctly switched between ISP IP and VPN IP. At this point it works, but I don’t think the setup is completely stable. I’d like to ask for guidance on: How to make sure Unbound stays reliable when the VPN gateway goes up/down. Best practices for LAN firewall rules so clients use the VPN when it’s up, and either fall back to WAN or get blocked (kill switch) when the VPN is down. Correctly assigning DNS servers to WAN and VPN gateways. At the moment, in System → General Setup, I don’t see the gateway dropdown next to DNS entries, so my DNS servers are just “floating” with no interface binding. If anyone has suggestions, or can point me to a clean reference configuration for WireGuard + Unbound + proper DNS gateway assignment, I’d greatly appreciate it. I'd really like to have a conference with someone and go over this. I'd like to give them access using RustDesk or TeamViewer so we can talk and they can show me things. I am legally blind so I am one inch from the screen. I've also uploaded the crashdump so you can look over it. I've also been using AI, but I keep going in circles with it, so it's not perfect. Thanks in advance! Warm Regards, Jamestextdump.tar.0
  • Darkstat Reports in MB /GB

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    935 Views
    No one has replied
  • Check_MK Package for 2.3

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    I have started trying to make one. I've already managed to get check_mk working manually, you can see my post here https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=111517.0 Once I have something to show, even if it just the GUI i'll create a new post / update this post. This is the first time I've looked at creating a pfsense package, so it might take me a few weeks to get my head round how it works.
  • Newbie Package Question

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    G
    @AR15USR: You have the latest version. If it were yellow color there would be an update. If it were red it is not fully installed. OK, dumb mistake. The stuff on the bottom is a legend, not a notification. Thanks.
  • Siproxyd on 2.3 just exits randomly without reason

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    It may be something about the request, then. I have heard recently from the siproxd author that he is working on a new version, it's possible it's a bug that has been corrected there.
  • Quagga ospf don't work with static routes

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    After long hours of search I come to believe, that package incorrectly builded. Do you have any idea how to resolve the problem?
  • IGMP Proxy bus error (Core dumped)

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    C
    Sorry… I mean the igmpproxy configuration.
  • QuaggaOSPFd / pfSense upgrade 2.2.6 -> 2.3

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ
    There was an update to the quagga package to help here. The problem tends to be from an empty interface landing in the quagga configuration. It probably started to work after the package was updated on the server, so the reinstall pulled a fixed copy.
  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    F
    I was just going to create a topic for this :). Thank you for the quick response.
  • OpenBGPd 0.11_4 on 2.3: Incorrect setup on package installation

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    665 Views
    No one has replied
  • Softflowd Multiple Interface problem

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Monitoring Internet Link

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    E
    Hi, I'm new with PFsense handling. I would like to ask from some help with pfsense settings and monitoring. Is there any chance that i can see continues logs and save it to my PC with Source Port, Destination site and bandwidth usage??? I been looking for days still can't find any solution. :'( :'( Please do help me.
  • Compat6x - pfSense 2.3

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Should be no need for VMware's tools. What problem were you having with open-vm-tools?
  • Mailreport

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    Thanks, I searched for the application and didn't get any hits.
  • Where did the APCUPSd package go?

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    @jbhowlesr: I'm not spreading bad info. My UPS is software dependant and without it, it doesn't operate like you specify. I know this because I have experienced a few power failures while using this UPS. With NUT only, my pfsense ran until it killed the battery in the UPS and hard powered off due to lack of power. With APCUPSd installed in ran until parameters were met in the settings I put in then it shut down my pfsense box before the battery died. Now as far as monitoring goes, I don't need a monitoring widget seeing how my UPS has a large LCD display on it. What I do need however is control fearures APCUPSd. I can't help but wonder if this was merely a NUT configuration problem.  Usually all the UPS does (regardless of model or software  on the host it is attached to) is report statistics, like % battery and estimated time left at current load, and the software processes this data and decides when to shut down the host. I wonder if there were some sort of permission issues preventing NUT from initiating proper shutdown, or if it was not reading the statistics from the UPS properly.
  • Ipguard package

    57
    0 Votes
    57 Posts
    39k Views
    A
    Some news regarding removed packages from 2.3: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.3_Removed_Packages . I also regret that ipguard was not included in pfSense 2.3.
  • Sqiud+AD problem

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    744 Views
    No one has replied
  • After upgrading from 2.2.6 to 2.3 named dont work

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    GertjanG
    @paulopastoriza: which the service is used in place of the bind / named in the new version? MENU => Services => DNS Forwarder or Resolver (you chose).
  • Creating first package - next steps?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    658 Views
    BBcan177B
    Here is the Bootstrap conversion guide: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=101062.0
  • Monitor Ip activity

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    V
    You have to setup squid as transparent proxy, that wil allow lightsquid to see traffic. But in my experience Bandwithd gives you better ip info.
  • Service_Watchdog 1.8.3 fails install [SOLVED]

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    ?
    @cmb: "No route to host" means you don't have a default gateway on the system. Or maybe that you have IPv6 configured internally but no IPv6 default route/Internet connectivity. Set the system to prefer IPv4 in that case under System>Advanced, Networking. Im marking this issue as solved and posting a thank you for the fix in the quote above. +1 Karma to cmb. Thank you for your reply. It solved my issue. It was indeed not having IPv6 under my WAN interface set to DHCP.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.