Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    It was all CVE fixes in the PHP GUI part of the package. See the Redmine ticket here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16414.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    V
    @Gertjan Thanks for your reply – that’s also my impression. The point is: I don’t really see any lists right now that are actually “maintained” in the sense of being actively cleaned up, checked for dead domains, categorized, etc. That’s why my main interest is more about the demand: Would curated lists really be a game changer for admins? Would they be more helpful than what’s available today, or are most people already using other alternatives? If so, which ones? And from your perspective, what would be your expectation towards “community lists”? (e.g. reliability, update frequency, categories, fewer false positives?)
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    610 Posts
    E
    Updated CE 2.7.2 to 1.86.4_1 Changelog pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:amd64/latest/All/tailscale-1.86.4_1.pkg Freshports
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    700 Topics
    4k Posts
    Bob.DigB
    @HFADmin If it is no Site2Site-VPN then you don't need any gateways in the first place... If that is true but you want to monitor the connection then you could create dummy-gateways just to ping the remote ip-addresses.
  • How to me configuration haproxy for redis cluster with autentification?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    803 Views
    No one has replied
  • Softflowd не отправляет данные в Nfsen

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    760 Views
    No one has replied
  • Squid Proxy Server Crashing System

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    868 Views
    No one has replied
  • Squidguard and loopback questions

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    763 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • [Haproxy-devel] GZIP-Compression?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    Hello, Is there an updated step by step way to do this? It is unclear if things have been changed since this original post was made but there isn't an apparent way to do this. Thanks in advance!
  • CRON job - calling URL

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @rcoleman-netgate THANK YOU :) That did the trick
  • Netgate SG-1100 unable to install packages

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    @spectre-988 said in Netgate SG-1100 unable to install packages: I've been working on using the device at my home for a HA fail over device. I've got the device to become part of the HA but when the primary wants to sync the packages they aren't able to due to packages not being installed. I try to install myself but package manager just sits at waiting for the update system to initiate. I am not sure if the version of Pfsense I am using is the problem or the Bios. I know both are older and tried to update Pfsense version and get that the system is on a later version than the official release. Without physically separated interfaces the 1100 is not suited for HA. It could do it, sure, but the WAN, LAN, and OPT are all the same NIC in the system, just VLAN'd to a switch. Your expectations should be very tempered -- failover cannot happen based on physical disconnection and is going to be unreliable.
  • Zabbix Uncaught Error

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    Hi, The solution it'a in this link: https://github.com/rbicelli/pfsense-zabbix-template/pull/118 I hope help somebody.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    69 Views
    No one has replied
  • HAproxy can only connect to "Default Backend"

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    865 Views
    No one has replied
  • Tailscale - package request / work opportunity

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    @returntrip https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fg_jIPVcioY
  • HAProxy - route by domain name

    haproxy acl
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    N
    @nasheayahu said in HAProxy - route by domain name: wwwkohanyimcom Host matches: no no www.kohanyin.com kohanyimcom Host contains: no no kohanyin.com I found the problem, my domain was spelled incorrectly...
  • How to get tcptraceroute, or a functional equivalent

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    E
    I know that this question is old, but it actually helped me getting tcptraceroute on opnsense. The key thing was pkg add from freebsd. So for me it needed to be updated since I am on freebsd:13:amd64, I found https://freebsd.pkgs.org/13/freebsd-amd64/ with search :) So for me the resulting command was: pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:13:amd64latest/All/tcptraceroute-1.5beta7.txz Still same version of tcptraceroute 2 years later, but it is how to find the package name that is important So thanks for this thread.
  • Wireguard Works only when OpenVPN Running in 2.6.0

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    663 Views
    No one has replied
  • 22.05 upgrade - site-to-site wireguard broken

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @buzz2912 Sounds like; https://forum.netgate.com/topic/173074/22-05-upgrade-breaks-remote-access-openvpn/15 same problem.
  • stunnel won't start

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    848 Views
    N
    Nvm im dumb... didn't read this line: [!] Service [Wireguard_SSL]: Protocol not supported
  • Freeradius limit access

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    G
    @mcury Thanks but this doesn't work in the users file. I think it's very restricted in what sort of entries can be made :(
  • pfSense+ 22.05/Wireguard dependency not documented

    Moved
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    B
    @jimp Ok. So I took a few minutes and there's somthing I'm not getting. When the Update setting is set to 22.05 the Package Manager shows two updatable packages, WireGuard 0.1.6_1 and ipsec-profile-wizard 1.0_4. [image: 1656626435886-screenshot-22.05.png] And much to my surprise, when the Update setting is set to 22.01, I see one updatable package WireGuard 0.1.6_1 !: [image: 1656626445074-screenshot-22.01.png] Is this correct? Is WireGuard 0.1.6_1 supposed to work on 22.01, or not? Upgrading WireGuard to 0.1.6_1 is the action that took down WireGuard in our NH router. Here are the messages from the NH log that appear to describe the problem: Jun 27 21:12:15 kernel linker_load_file: /boot/modules/if_wg.ko - unsupported file type Jun 27 21:12:15 kernel KLD if_wg.ko: depends on kernel - not available or version mismatch What's wrong?
  • bind no longer running after pkg/pfsense updates

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @dvl Great. Option 2 would have been to reinstall and restore from backup. The upgrade thing catches lots of people. I put it in my sig a while back. One such problem is when the package is dependent on a PHP version that doesn't exist in the older pfSense, so it gets upgraded. There's a redmine to hopefully fix it or at least block/warn people.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.